Channel
@Naglemaani
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,075subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001264588207 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Naglemaani |
| Created | 22 October 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Naglemaani |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:28 | 1,075 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:36 | 1,074 | -5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:52 | 1,079 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:34 | 1,077 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:30 | 1,077 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:36 | 1,076 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (14 June 2026 – 1 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,033 |
| Reactions total | 69 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 12:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
179 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 92 | 51.4% | |
| 👍 | 30 | 16.8% | |
| 👏 | 19 | 10.6% | |
| 👌 | 18 | 10.1% | |
| 🙏 | 7 | 3.91% | |
| 👎 | 5 | 2.79% | |
| 🕊 | 4 | 2.23% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 1.68% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.559% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 179reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
آب کم جو تشنگی آور به دست #مولانا شنیدم که لقمان پسر را ز مهر به اندرز فرمود کای خوبچهر "مخور لقمه جز خسروانی خورش که تن یابدت زان خورش پرورش" مجو کام جز از بُتِ نوشخنند میارام جز در دواج پرند (=لحاف ابریشمین) به هر خطّهای خانه بنیاد کن وزان خاطرِ دوستان شاد کن بگفت ای پدر پندِ ممکن سرای بگفت ای پسر سوی معنی گرای چنان لقمه بر خویشتن گیرتنگ که گردد به کامت چو شکّر، شرنگ(=زَهر) ز وصل پری باش چندان بَری که در د…
❤5👍1
ای بسا دست که مردم به ضرورت بوسند که اگر دست دهد، قطع کنند از شمشمیر لا ادری نیز همو گفته: از دست بوس میل به پابوس کرده ای خاکت به سر ترقی معکوس کرده ای سعدی هم می گوید: چو دستی نشاید گزیدن، ببوس که با غالبان چاره زرق است و لوس (=تملق، چرب زبانی) اما حافظ فرموده: مبوس جز لب ساقی و جام می حافظ که دست زهدفروشان خطاست بوسیدن http://t.me/Naglemaani
❤1👍1
#اکبر_عبدی
❤11👌1
🖊 چرا هنرمندان اغلب چپگرا میشوند؟ ✍️ مرتضی نعمتی «آنچه در هنر فضیلت است، در سیاست فاجعهبار خواهد بود.» این جمله را میتوانید عصارهٔ یادداشت کوتاهی بدانید که میخواهم در نسبت هنر و سیاست طرح کنم. در این مورد که «چرا هنرمندان عمدتا چپگرا و حتی مارکسیست هستند؟» وضوح چندانی وجود ندارد. پاسخ به این پرسش روشن میکند که وقتی هنرمندان، سلبریتیها و بدتر از همه «رَپرها» را در جایگاه مرجع فکری قرار دهیم، باید منتظر چه پی…
❤4👍2👎2
مولوی میگوید هر عملی اعم از این که خوب باشد یا بد، مجازات و مکافات دارد و هر چه به ما میرسد نتیجه اعمال ماست: گرچه دیوار افکند سایه دراز باز گردد سوی او آن سایه باز این جهان کوه است و فعل ما ندا سوی ما آید نداها را صدا ** چونکه بد کردی بترس ایمن مباش زانکه تخم است و برویاند خداش ** ای دریده پوستین یوسفان گر بدرد گرگت آن، از خویش دان این جهان کوه است و گفت و گوی تو چون صدا هم باز آید سوی تو ** خاربُن دان هر یکی خوی…
❤4👏3👎1
در پهنهی زمین و زمان غیرِ درد نیست گشتم نبود شادی و شوری، نگرد نیست وقتی که ذهن باغ ز فکرِ ثمر تهیست فرقی میان شاخهی سرسبز و زرد نیست از دستِ سردمهری مردم خزیدهام در لاک خود، وگرنه هوا هیچ سرد نیست افسانه گشت مردی و مردانگی، بلی هرکس گذاشت ریش و سبیلی که مرد نیست با آنکه گرد و خاک به پا میکند، بگو مرد آن که کرده است به پا خاک و گرد، نیست "شیر خدا و رستم دستانم آرزوست" هرکس که داشت اسلحه، مرد نبرد نیست از ر…
❤7👍4💯3👌2👏1
آیا فردوسی آگاهانه از به کارگیری واژگان عربی درشاهنامه پرهیز کرده است؟ شاهنامه فردوسی بزرگترین حماسه ملی ایرانیان و یکی از مهمترین آثار ادبی جهان است. از دیرباز این سخن میان مردم رواج داشته که «فردوسی حتی یک واژه عربی در شاهنامه به کار نبرده است. این گزاره بارها در کتابها سخنرانیها و فضای مجازی تکرار شده اما پژوهشهای زبان شناختی نشان داده اند که این ادعا به شکل مطلق درست نیست. با این حال همین پژوهشها بر نکتهای مهم…
👍11❤4👏1
یک جهان نقصان چیست گیتـی؟ محفـــلی با قیـــل و قــال آمیخته ذرههــــــائــی، از وجــــــــــودِ بـــــا زوال آمیختـه این تــلاشِ آرزوآمیــــزِ هستـــی نــــام چیست؟ خـــواب بـیتـعـبـیـر گـنـگـی با خـیــــــال آمیخته وین گنهآلــــودهکردارِ پر از تـشــــویش چیست؟ اشـتـیــــــاق لــــذتـی بـــــا انـفـعـــــــال آمیخته چیست این مخلوق لایشعر که دارد شوق فیض؟ یک جهـــان نقصـان، به یک ارزن کمــــال آمیخته قهـــر و…
❤5👌2👍2
هر بار دل سپردنت از روی دشمنی ست دیگر نیا! اگر چه که آن روی دیدنی ست هرگز به بازگشتن تو دل نبسته ام باید قبول کرد،سفر کرده رفتنی ست حرمت نگه نداشت دلت،جایِ شکوه نیست شیشه به چشم سنگ متاعی شکستنی ست در چشم خلق متهمی بیش نیستم بی آبرویی ام ثمر پاکدامنی ست آخر عزیز می شوم اینجا به دست مرگ پایان شاهنامه من نیز خواندنی ست #علیرضا_آصفی http://t.me/Naglemaani
❤4👏3
✅ پایان تلخ یا تلخیِ بیپایان (نکتهای دربارۀ روابط سمّی) یکی از واقعیتهای مهم در روابط انسانی این است که گاه ما در کنار افرادی قرار میگیریم که به شدت حساس و زودرنج و بدگمان هستند. آنها آن قدر حساسند که هر چیزی به پر قبایشان برمیخورد و فوراً احساس خطر میکنند. در کنار چنین کسانی ما باید مراقب کوچکترین سخنان و جزئیترین رفتارهایمان باشیم، وگرنه ممکن است از ما برنجند. گاهی هم شخص زودرنج و حساس نیست، ولی متعصب است …
👏6❤2👌1
«این جهان پُرِ از صدای حرکتِ پاهای مردمیست که همچنان که تو را میبوسند در ذهن خود طناب دارِ تو را میبافند». #فروغ_فرّخزاد http://t.me/Naglemaani
👍5❤1👏1
گفتم: لبِ تو را که دلِ من تو بردهای گفتا: کدام دل؟ چه نشان؟ کِی؟ کجا؟که بُرد؟ #سعدی http://t.me/Naglemaani
👌3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Naglemaani. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 263,611 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“چراغِ روشن” (@Naglemaani), 1,075 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Naglemaani.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.