Channel
@Nadav_Eyal
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,529subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001386194888 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Nadav_Eyal |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Nadav_Eyal |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:26 | 1,529 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:44 | 1,530 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:15 | 1,533 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:47 | 1,532 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
5 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 5 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 September 2025 to 12 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
נדב איל Nadav Eyal (Twitter) RT @kann_news: הרמיזה של ראש המוסד לקבינט לפני התקיפה בקטר: "כשיש מו"מ - אתה לא מחסל את מי שאתה מתנהל מולו" | פרסום ראשון של @shemeshmicha #מהדורתכאןחדשות עם @talberman
נדב איל Nadav Eyal (Twitter) RT @Haaretz: הובאה אזוקה לבימ"ש: הוארך ב-5 ימים מעצר אישה ששיתפה תיעוד מנפאל ift.tt/ofK69yV
נדב איל Nadav Eyal (Twitter) RT @ronenbergman: For the first time, Israel struck Hamas in Qatar. What’s next? I had the pleasure to join @dansenor, @Nadav_Eyal and @AmitSegal on Call Me Back to discuss lnk.to/nCWy4X
נדב איל Nadav Eyal (Twitter) הטור שלי במוסף לשבת: בעצם, ראשי מערכת הביטחון התנגדו לפעולה בקטאר. מה זה "להסתייג מהטיימינג?" בפעולות כאלה, בין אם לדעתכם הן ירסקו עסקת חטופים או יביאו ניצחון, טיימינג הוא הכל. נתניהו כפה את זה, כי חיפש תגובה מהירה לפיגוע בירושלים. כרגיל אצלו, את זה הלבישו כאסטרטגיה. זה עבר בזכות העייפות של הקצינים מהקמפיין הלא נגמר נגדם, ואת הקבינט לא כינסו. זה אותו קבינט שידע על איראן. למה בעצם? ואיפה …
נדב איל Nadav Eyal (Twitter) RT @MoriahAsraf: פרטים נוספים על הידיעה הזו שפורסמה ב@newsisrael13: בכיר ישראלי אומר לי הערב, בצל הקיפאון במו״מ לשחרור החטופים, כי רוב הגורמים המקצועייח שנכחו בדיון המקדים לתקיפה בקטר סבור כי העיתוי הנוכחי ״הכי פחות נוח שאפשר לחשוב עליו״. לדברי הבכיר הישראלי, נאמר לרה״מ באותם הדיונים שבכירי חמאס מתכנסים בשביל לדון במתווה שישראל יזמה ולכן ״כדאי לתת צ׳אנס למגעים״. לדבריו, ״רה״מ בחר שלא …
נדב איל Nadav Eyal (Twitter) RT @OdeliaMinnes: בהמשך לדברים, הבת שלי העלתה את הסרטון הקצרצר והמדויק הזה באינסטגרם. https://twitter.com/OdeliaMinnes/status/1965994979307741389#m
נדב איל Nadav Eyal (Twitter) RT @hkim14050017: מהנעשה בפרדס חנה-כרכור הבוקר.
נדב איל Nadav Eyal (Twitter) RT @guyelster: שמישהו ישאל את חברי מכונת הרעל איפה הם היו כששני מחוקקים דמוקרטים נרצחו במינסוטה לפני חודשיים, האם גם אז האשימו את כל הימין האמריקני, או הישראלי, בכך? האם זה הזיז להם בכלל? שאלות רטוריות כמובן
👍5
נדב איל Nadav Eyal (Twitter) RT @spectatorindex: BREAKING: Netanyahu calls Charlie Kirk a 'lion-hearted friend of Israel' and an 'incredible human being'
נדב איל Nadav Eyal (Twitter) RT @yashar: BREAKING via WSJ “Investigators found ammunition engraved with expressions of transgender and antifascist ideology inside the rifle that authorities believe was used in the fatal shooting of Charlie Kirk.” Full Story: bit.ly/4gk165z
נדב איל Nadav Eyal (Twitter) RT @tomselliott: Megyn Kelly breaks down reporting the death of Charlie Kirk
נדב איל Nadav Eyal (Twitter) RT @DonaldJTrumpJr: This isn’t my strong suit and I don’t even know how to begin to put into words the loss I am feeling right now over the assassination of Charlie Kirk. Charlie wasn’t just a friend — he was like a little brother to me - and to millions of people around the world - he was a true inspiration. He was one of the most courageous, principled men I’ve ever known, and he live…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Nadav_Eyal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,124,659 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Nadav_Eyal named 11 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“נדב איל” (@Nadav_Eyal), 1,529 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Nadav_Eyal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.