Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for NUTSACK SQUIRREL

Supergroup

NUTSACK SQUIRREL

@NUTSACK_SQUIRREL

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry

6,839members

-10,431 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

21 online right now

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003999428991
TypeSupergroup
Username@NUTSACK_SQUIRREL
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded18 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/NUTSACK_SQUIRREL

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,83917,27012,054.57 August 2026 — 17,270 members7 August 2026 — 17,162 members9 August 2026 — 17,113 members10 August 2026 — 17,054 members10 August 2026 — 16,970 members11 August 2026 — 16,912 members12 August 2026 — 16,885 members14 August 2026 — 16,825 members15 August 2026 — 16,366 members16 August 2026 — 16,323 members17 August 2026 — 16,309 members18 August 2026 — 16,309 members18 August 2026 — 16,259 members20 August 2026 — 16,084 members20 August 2026 — 16,043 members22 August 2026 — 14,802 members24 August 2026 — 14,139 members25 August 2026 — 13,154 members26 August 2026 — 13,040 members27 August 2026 — 13,014 members28 August 2026 — 12,997 members28 August 2026 — 12,967 members29 August 2026 — 12,948 members31 August 2026 — 12,888 members1 September 2026 — 12,807 members1 September 2026 — 12,795 members3 September 2026 — 12,754 members4 September 2026 — 11,711 members7 September 2026 — 9,725 members12 September 2026 — 8,004 members16 September 2026 — 6,839 members7 August 202616 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 40 days, net -10,431. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,274–18,835 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every members count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)MembersChange
16 Sept 2026, 02:386,839-1,165
12 Sept 2026, 00:218,004-1,721
7 Sept 2026, 17:559,725-1,986
4 Sept 2026, 17:3911,711-1,043
3 Sept 2026, 01:4712,754-41
1 Sept 2026, 21:3412,795-12
1 Sept 2026, 00:4612,807-81
31 Aug 2026, 01:3512,888-60
29 Aug 2026, 22:4612,948-19
28 Aug 2026, 23:0512,967-30
28 Aug 2026, 01:3412,997-17
27 Aug 2026, 02:0513,014-26
26 Aug 2026, 04:1813,040-114
25 Aug 2026, 05:3613,154-985
24 Aug 2026, 04:4214,139-663
22 Aug 2026, 10:0214,802-1,241
20 Aug 2026, 23:4616,043-41
20 Aug 2026, 00:5716,084-175
18 Aug 2026, 23:5316,259-50
18 Aug 2026, 09:3616,309first reading

Engagement

No public post preview. We read this entry on 18 August 2026 and Telegram serves no public post stream for it — the channel has previews switched off, or it is a group or bot with no readable feed. Views, reactions and engagement rates cannot be measured from the outside for an entry in this state, so we publish none. Subscriber counts above are unaffected.

Mentions

Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

𝗖𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀𝗲 𝗖𝗿𝘆𝗽𝘁𝗼 𝗡𝗲𝘁𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸 | 𝗚𝗿𝗼𝘄𝘁𝗵 𝗡𝗲𝘁𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸
@ChineseCryptoNetwork · 73,179
27 posts
Crypto Librarys Airdrop
@CryptoLibrarysAirdrop · 80,302
12 posts
📞Bsc-Sol-Eth🎙🎙CALLS📞
@Bsc_Sol_Eth_calls · 75,514
11 posts
CWC | CHINA WHALE COMMUNITY
@ChineseWhalesCommunity · 7,679
8 posts
👑Crypto Royal Trader
@Crypto_RoyalGems · 14,778
6 posts
🦄 𝗔𝗹𝗽𝗵𝗮 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝗹𝗲𝘀 𝗖𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘀🐳
@AlphaWhale_Calls · 13,750
5 posts
𝐂𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐞 𝐜𝐫𝐲𝐩𝐭𝐨 𝐡𝐮𝐛, 𝐚𝐬𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐦𝐚𝐫𝐤𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠
@Chinese_crypto_hub · 15,579
5 posts
𝗖𝗿𝘆𝗽𝘁𝗼 𝗖𝗹𝗮𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗖𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘀
@CryptoClarityCalls · 13,975
5 posts
𝗖𝗿𝘆𝗽𝘁𝗼 𝗧𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝗖𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘀 💥
@CryptoTraderGems · 6,602
4 posts
Crypto Shark Gems 💎🦈
@TheCryptoSharkcalls · 17,739
4 posts
𝗪𝗵𝗮𝗹𝗲𝘀 𝗖𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘀 🐳
@Crypto_WhalesCalls · 16,609
3 posts
💥Crypto KingKong 🐵
@CryptoKingKongOfficial · 5,010
3 posts
Kingdom of 100XCalls
@kingdom100xGems · 14,128
3 posts
𝗖𝗿𝘆𝗽𝘁𝗼 𝗛𝘂𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗚𝗲𝗺𝘀 ☎️
@THE_CRYPTO_HUNTER_GMES · 5,064
3 posts
𝗖𝗿𝘆𝗽𝘁𝗼 𝗔𝗹𝗽𝗵𝗮 𝗚𝗲𝗺𝘀 💯 📞
@CryptoAlphaGems · 18,261
2 posts
𝗖𝗿𝘆𝗽𝘁𝗼 𝗪𝗼𝗹𝗳 𝗚𝗲𝗺𝘀🐺
@CryptoOfficalWolfGems · 14,603
2 posts
𝗗𝗼𝗹𝗽𝗵𝗶𝗻 🐬 𝗢𝗳𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗖𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘀
@Dolphin_Officill_gemss · 3,898
2 posts
𝐁𝐢𝐠 𝐁𝐚𝐧𝐠 𝐆𝐞𝐦𝐬 💣
@BigBangGems · 10,655
1 post
𝗖𝗿𝘆𝗽𝘁𝗼 𝗕𝘂𝗹𝗹𝘀 𝗖𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘀 🌍☎️
@CryptoBullsCallsOfficial · 19,082
1 post
𝐌𝐨𝐨𝐧 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐫 𝐎𝐟𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥
@Moon_StarOfficial · 1,419
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“NUTSACK SQUIRREL” (@NUTSACK_SQUIRREL), 6,839 members as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NUTSACK_SQUIRREL.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.