Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for NPC Reserves

Channel

NPC Reserves

@NPCreserves

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,981subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001493141930
TypeChannel
Username@NPCreserves
Created17 January 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/NPCreserves

Growth

1,9791,9851,9826 August 2026 — 1,985 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,985 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,984 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,979 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,981 subscribers1,9816 August 202616 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,978–1,986 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 20:571,981+2
13 Aug 2026, 11:371,979-5
10 Aug 2026, 10:341,984-1
6 Aug 2026, 11:231,985no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:531,985first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 29 December 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 48s
Average length
54s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

153 reactions across 16 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4026.1%
🤣2919.0%
👎2214.4%
😁2013.1%
🤯159.80%
53.27%
🤔42.61%
🤮42.61%
31.96%
👏31.96%
🖕21.31%
🤡21.31%
👾10.654%
💋10.654%
🔥10.654%
🥰10.654%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 153reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 29 December 2024 to 5 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Apr 2026, 03:51 UTC378 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

You don't see the other UAE lobbyists sniffing their own farts like this.

😁6🤔1

19 Mar 2025, 06:18 UTC≈1,250 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Undefined subject sends a threatening letter to Senator Biden and signs it JFK Jr. 🤭 The real JFK Jr. then DIES five years later. 🤯

🤯15👏1

19 Mar 2025, 06:17 UTC964 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Everything makes it into the file. Including open source. If anybody's interested in this magazine article, there's a copy on Ebay.

3

1 Mar 2025, 18:06 UTC≈1,040 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🤣16🤡2

28 Feb 2025, 19:37 UTC887 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

4. Trump basically kicked Zalenskyy out of the White House, and as a parent, I find this appalling. Did he even try putting him in the corner first, taking away his Nintendo switch, or grounding him along with his jets? Where was Melania while all this was going down? She never allowed things to escalate so far with Barron.

😁6👍1🤮1

28 Feb 2025, 19:36 UTC686 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

3. Trump had the perfect opportunity to throw Zalenskyy over his knee and spank him in front of the cameras, yet he failed to act. What kind of message does this send to the world? This is NOT what I voted for.

👏2🤮1

28 Feb 2025, 19:36 UTC579 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

2. Zalenskyy was inappropriately dressed for the occasion. Granted, he's no Barney Frank, and we couldn't see his nipples, but still -- very, very disrespectful. Shame on Trump for complimenting his little outfit.

👍2🤮1

28 Feb 2025, 19:36 UTC506 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

The Zalenskyy visit was a complete disaster. 1. Trump personally greeted Zalenskyy upon his arrival to the White House. Should've sent the guy whose job it is to fetch the diet cokes to go fetch Zalenskyy.

👍1🤮1

25 Feb 2025, 03:34 UTC639 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

https://web.archive.org/web/20220702201100/https://npcdaily.com/6531/biden-appoints-michael-hayden-special-presidential-envoy-for-lgbtqiap/ (published 06/13/22) One of my personal favorites.

😁1

22 Feb 2025, 03:04 UTC869 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🤣5😁2👾1🥰1

1 Jan 2025, 07:23 UTC≈1,210 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

The case against STEM.

👍17👎1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @NPCreserves. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 972,249 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“NPC Reserves” (@NPCreserves), 1,981 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NPCreserves.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.