Channel
@NNaLaBels
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001905028950 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NNaLaBels |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 28 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NNaLaBels |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:06 | 3 | no change |
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 3 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 28 September 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
7 reactions across 7 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🍓 | 7 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 28 September 2023 to 23 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 17 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 29 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
Сᴇйчᴀᴄ Ёнʍи и Х϶ин ᴨᴩᴏʙᴇдуᴛ ϶ɸиᴩ ʙ ᴛиᴋ ᴛᴏᴋᴇ, ɜᴀᴧᴇᴛᴀйᴛᴇ ᴨᴏᴏбщᴀᴛьᴄя!!) #репост
переходим на канал : @Openbukent !!
🍓1
наверное я закрою её без опроса... извините меня, я правда этого не хочу!!! просто идут массовые отписки, а канал я вытягивать не могу.. Дракоши, я вас очень люблю!!! не отписывайтесь, тогда может быть я открою её снова!! спасибо вам за актив и прелестные игры!! люблю вас... удачи во всём, пока!!! ❤️😭 мы ещё увидемся!💋💋💋
🍓1
𝒅𝒐 𝒚𝒐𝒖 𝒍𝒐𝒗𝒆 𝒎𝒆 𝒐𝒓 𝒉𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒎𝒆. . ᴨᴩиʙᴇᴇᴇᴛ! ! #ᝰ -ʙ ϶ᴛᴏᴛ ᴋᴀнᴀᴧ будуᴛ ʙыᴋᴧᴀдыʙᴀᴛьᴄя ʙидᴇᴏ ᴄ нᴀɯих ᴛᴀнцᴇʙ, ᴄʍᴇɯныᴇ нᴀᴩᴇɜᴋи и ᴛ.д #ᝰ -нᴀдᴇюᴄь ʙᴀʍ ᴨᴏнᴩᴀʙиᴛᴄя ϶ᴛᴏᴛ ᴋᴏʍɸᴏᴩᴛный ᴋᴀнᴀᴧ! ! ᴧюбиʍ, ᴨᴏᴋᴀ!! #лизочка #полиночка
🍓1
солнышко, подпишись пожалуйста❤️❤️❤️
🍓1
так вы можете узнать меня (владельца компании) поближе, думаю это важно❤️
🍓1
⟡ ─ · ୧ 🫧 ୨ · ─ ⟡ 𝙊𝙈𝙂, 𝙉𝙚𝙬 𝙜𝙧𝙤𝙪𝙥 𝙪𝙣𝙙𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙤𝙛 𝙎𝙩𝙖𝙧𝙡𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙩 𝙀𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙩𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩?? ✮ 𝗧𝗘𝗟𝗘𝗚𝗥𝗔𝗠 𝗖𝗛𝗔𝗡𝗡𝗘𝗟: https://t.me/fwlbe ><Сᴇᴦᴏдня ʍы ʙɜяᴧи ᴨᴏд ᴄʙᴏᴇ ᴋᴩыᴧᴏ ᴦᴩуᴨᴨу Blᴀᴄᴋ Kiss, ʍы будᴇʍ ᴄᴛᴀᴩᴀᴛьᴄя ᴨᴩᴏдʙиᴦᴀᴛь их, и ᴄ нᴀʍи ᴏни дᴏᴄᴛиᴦнуᴛ нᴏʙых ʙыᴄᴏᴛ. Дᴀʙᴀйᴛᴇ ᴩᴀᴄᴄᴋᴀжᴇʍ ʙᴀʍ нᴇʍнᴏᴦᴏ ᴏ них: Нᴀɜʙᴀниᴇ: Blᴀᴄᴋ ᴋiss Фᴀндᴏʍ: ʙlᴀᴄᴋyᴋis Хᴇйᴛᴇᴩы: ʙriᴄᴋʙlᴀᴄᴋ Цʙᴇᴛᴀ: чᴇᴩнᴏ-ᴋᴩᴀᴄный Пᴏɜиции: Пᴀᴋ Мия- Лидᴇᴩ, …
⭑ 𝗖𝗢𝗠𝗘𝗕𝗔𝗖𝗞 𝗔𝗚𝗢 ⭑ ————————————————————————— 𝘚𝘰𝘯𝘨: 𝘚𝘩𝘶𝘵 𝘋𝘰𝘸𝘯-𝘉𝘭𝘢𝘤𝘬𝘱𝘪𝘯𝘬 ୧ ┄ – ┄ ୧ ꒰ ❕ ꒱ ୨ ┄ – ┄ ୨ E͟͟u͟͟n͟͟ C͟͟h͟͟a͟͟n͟͟, S͟͟o͟͟y͟͟e͟͟o͟͟n͟͟, A͟͟v͟͟a͟͟ a͟͟n͟͟d͟͟ M͟͟i͟͟y͟͟e͟͟o͟͟n͟͟ 𖥔 𝘾𝙊𝙈𝙋𝘼𝙉𝙔: 𝙎𝙏𝘼𝙍𝙇𝙄𝙂𝙃𝙏 𝙀𝙉𝙏𝙀𝙍𝙏𝘼𝙄𝙉𝙈𝙀𝙉𝙏 𝗧𝗘𝗟𝗘𝗚𝗥𝗔𝗠 𝗖𝗛𝗔𝗡𝗡𝗘𝗟: https://t.me/agoid5 ୨୧ --- ୨୧ --- ୨୧ --- ୨୧ --- ୨୧ Кᴀʍб϶ᴋ нᴀɯих чудᴇᴄных AGO, ᴨᴏɜдᴩᴀʙᴧяᴇʍ дᴇʙᴏчᴇᴋ!! Жᴇᴧᴀᴇʍ иʍ чᴛᴏбы их …
﹢ ☁️ ᰍ ꒰ ୨୧ • ⩊ • ⸝⸝꒱ ❕ 𓆩 ✉️ 𓆪 У нᴀɯᴇй нᴏʙᴏй ᴛᴩᴇйни Сᴏхᴇн ᴇᴄᴛь ᴛᴇᴧᴇᴦᴩᴀʍʍ ᴋᴀнᴀᴧ, ᴇᴄᴧи ʙᴀʍ нᴇ ᴄᴧᴏжнᴏ ᴛᴏ ᴨᴏдᴨиɯиᴛᴇᴄь нᴀ нᴇᴦᴏ и ᴨᴏʍᴏᴦиᴛᴇ ᴇй ʙ ᴇᴦᴏ ᴨᴩᴏдʙижᴇнии, ᴇй будᴇᴛ ᴏчᴇнь ᴨᴩияᴛнᴏ!! ✧ 𝗧𝗘𝗟𝗘𝗚𝗥𝗔𝗠 𝗖𝗛𝗔𝗡𝗡𝗘𝗟: https://t.me/soheni
₊ ✿ ₊ ° . ✿ . ° ₊ ✿ Дᴀʙᴀйᴛᴇ дᴏбьёʍ 330 ᴨᴏдᴨиᴄчиᴋᴏʙ?? Нᴀ 330 ᴄдᴇᴧᴀᴇʍ нᴇбᴏᴧьɯую иᴦᴩу «Кᴀᴋ хᴏᴩᴏɯᴏ ʙы ɜнᴀᴇᴛᴇ нᴀɯу ᴋᴏʍᴨᴀнию?», ᴀ ᴛᴀᴋжᴇ нᴀ 330 ᴨᴏдᴨиᴄчиᴋᴏʙ ᴄᴋᴀжᴇʍ ʙᴀʍ ᴏдну инᴛᴇᴩᴇᴄную нᴏʙᴏᴄᴛь) 10<330 #репост
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @NNaLaBels. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@NNaLaBels named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“// N:NA LaBels 🎧” (@NNaLaBels), 3 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NNaLaBels.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.