Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for NK — life, ton, crypto.

Channel

NK — life, ton, crypto.

@NKCRYPTO_8

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,226subscribers

-19 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002234714445
TypeChannel
Username@NKCRYPTO_8
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/NKCRYPTO_8

Growth

1,2261,2451,235.57 August 2026 — 1,245 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,245 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,243 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,241 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,239 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,238 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,236 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,231 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,226 subscribers7 August 202629 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 22 days, net -19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,223–1,248 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 07:081,226-5
26 Aug 2026, 12:121,231-5
23 Aug 2026, 09:041,236-2
20 Aug 2026, 00:151,238-1
17 Aug 2026, 10:471,239-2
14 Aug 2026, 03:151,241-2
11 Aug 2026, 00:411,243-2
7 Aug 2026, 23:011,245no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:281,245first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 11 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

221 reactions across 16 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🐳11451.6%
custom 59383680056111958774419.9%
custom 60283151477542785963515.8%
custom 52583327984097835822812.7%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 221 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 11 September 2025 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 16 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @NKCRYPTO_8. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 September 2025 to 16 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

16 Jul 2026, 07:08 UTC63 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

то что в телеграм нельзя архивировать посты — большой минус! схуяли я не могу архивировать!!!

🐳5

Signed NK 🔕

16 Jul 2026, 05:44 UTC68 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

более разъебного финала для себя я и представить не мог! vamos, vamos Argentina 🩵🤍🩵

🐳5

Signed NK 🔕

24 Jun 2026, 09:44 UTC138 views10 reactions5 Starsread 7 August 2026

слышишь, дружище, не волнуйся

🐳10

Signed NK 🔕

13 Jun 2026, 14:13 UTC226 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

три вывода к 27 годам 1) вкуснее киндера только kinder 2) хуже фьючерсов только казино 3) быть счастливым это выбор

🐳3

Signed NK 🔕

11 Jun 2026, 20:33 UTC238 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

дела отлично, психика в норме курить перестал, бабки нормально экономит ночами не шляюсь, работаю на двух работах в свободное время дома, в мыслях о своих заботах

🐳11

Signed NK 🔕

10 Jun 2026, 16:24 UTC211 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

привет, как дела?

🐳10

Signed NK 🔕

5 Feb 2026, 04:34 UTC477 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

discipline over motivation

🐳8custom 59383680056111958775

Signed NK 🔕

26 Jan 2026, 14:32 UTC552 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Чуть-чуть life. Минское море. Зима. Кормил уточек и лебедей. Впервые в жизни окунался в прорубь. Работал, гулял, отдыхал, веселился. На 3 фото – Саша Кот. Вайб 2026 года мне уже нравится. На крипту плевать.

🐳12custom 59383680056111958774

Signed NK 🔕

23 Jan 2026, 01:13 UTC385 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

А что если раз в год выкладывать пост 1 января и все 🫠

🐳9custom 59383680056111958772

Signed NK 🔕

31 Dec 2025, 21:33 UTC453 views19 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

С новым годом, друзья! Пусть 2026 год принесет вам все то, что сами себе пожелаете 🫶 Очень рад что 2025 завершился, к сожалению и к счастью самый худший год in my life. 2026, не подведи. И я не подведу. Писал сегодня пост с итогами 2025 и целями на 2026, но разучился писать посты и не выложил 😢 может быть когда-то снова научусь) За Вас! 🥂

🐳17custom 59383680056111958772

14 Oct 2025, 09:05 UTC603 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 60283151477542785968🐳6custom 52583327984097835825

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @NKCRYPTO_8. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 625,871 of 1,629,362 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“NK — life, ton, crypto.” (@NKCRYPTO_8), 1,226 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NKCRYPTO_8.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.