🧪Altcoins at the start. Preparations for the momentum are already underway. 🔍 You can get the following entry points for free 🔐 Limited access: only 100 seats available 👉 https://t.me/+BU7l1Xav6hVjYTEy
👍3❤1

Channel
@NFTs_Crypto_TM
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
32,223subscribers
-2,075 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002134329707 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NFTs_Crypto_TM |
| Description | #NFTsCrypto _ is the leading crypto and blockchain news site that ‘bridges’ the gap between companies. Buy ads: @Melvin_Zh48 ZK https://telega.io/c/NFTs_Crypto_TM Let’s make 💰 with crypto! |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NFTs_Crypto_TM |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 16:42 | 32,223 | -278 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 05:59 | 32,501 | -82 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 08:57 | 32,583 | -75 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 16:57 | 32,658 | -84 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 21:15 | 32,742 | -59 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 07:19 | 32,801 | -186 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 21:19 | 32,987 | -79 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 22:40 | 33,066 | -71 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 13:35 | 33,137 | -52 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 14:46 | 33,189 | -58 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:37 | 33,247 | -62 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:15 | 33,309 | -72 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:23 | 33,381 | -33 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 14:56 | 33,414 | -40 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 17:04 | 33,454 | -27 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 19:48 | 33,481 | -46 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:07 | 33,527 | -42 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:03 | 33,569 | -74 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:56 | 33,643 | -61 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 18:37 | 33,704 | first reading |
27 posts held, back to 15 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 87 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 27 (15 March 2026 – 22 September 2026) |
| Views total | 2,468 |
| Reactions total | 35 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 19:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
360 reactions across 27 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 218 | 60.6% | |
| ❤ | 65 | 18.1% | |
| 🔥 | 55 | 15.3% | |
| 👏 | 13 | 3.61% | |
| 💯 | 9 | 2.50% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 360 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 15 March 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🧪Altcoins at the start. Preparations for the momentum are already underway. 🔍 You can get the following entry points for free 🔐 Limited access: only 100 seats available 👉 https://t.me/+BU7l1Xav6hVjYTEy
👍3❤1
✊ SEC Allows Tokenized Stock Trading SEC has allowed limited trading of tokenized stocks on blockchain through a five-year “Innovation Exemption”, effective immediately. It is the regulator’s first concrete step after the CLARITY Act failed in the Senate. Trading venues for tokenized securities are exempt from being classified as exchanges. Liquidity providers trading stocks or operating through smart contracts, in…
🔥7👍2❤1
📢 Advertising in this channel You can place an ad via Telega․io. It takes just a few minutes. Formats and current rates: View details
👍6🔥2
💸Binance foils $5 Million Heist Amid Turkish Exchange Hack & Avalanche Token Theft. In a dramatic cybercrime twist, Binance has frozen over $5.3 million in stolen funds following a massive hack on Turkish exchange BtcTurk. The attack compromised ten hot wallets, leading to the theft of approximately $54 million in Avalanche tokens. The stolen assets were dispersed across multiple exchanges, including Binance and Coi…
👍8❤3💯1🔥1
🪙Bitcoin remains near $80,000 as CryptoQuant says most groups are profitable again, with some holders taking profits, while ETF inflows and lower US yields continue. 🎨Non |Fungible | Tokens Business Tips💳 |Crypto❤️
👍8❤3👏1🔥1
🚀 CRYPTOMARKET EXPLODES Bitcoin is back above $79,000, up more than 10% in 24 hours as a massive cryptocurrency rally gathers momentum. But BTC isn’t moving alone: 🟠 BTC +10.8% 🔵 ETH +8.4% 🟣 SOL +8.1% ⚡️ XRP +18.8% 📈 DOT +9.7% The rally is fueled by short liquidations, renewed demand for ETFs, improved liquidity, and growing optimism about U.S. cryptocurrency regulation. 🔥 Bitcoin is on fire — and altcoins are f…
👍9❤2🔥2👏1
📊 Institutions Poured $11.2B Into Regulated Crypto in H1 2026 A review of every crypto funding deal in the first half of 2026 found $11.2 billion in total investment, with capital flowing almost exclusively to regulated firms rather than permissionless protocols. BlackRock, Goldman Sachs, and Gulf sovereign wealth funds were among the key backers identified in the analysis, conducted by Dubai-based crypto lawyer Ir…
👍7❤2👏1🔥1
🟠 Bitwise CIO sees trillions in institutional capital moving to Bitcoin Bitwise Asset Management CIO Matt Hougan says large institutional capital pools control up to $200 trillion globally, and a 1% allocation shift toward Bitcoin could unlock massive long-term inflows into the asset. Hougan's comments reflect a broader thesis gaining traction among crypto-native asset managers: that traditional institutional inves…
👍8❤2👏1🔥1
💎💎💎💎💎 OpenAI secured the full $50B from Amazon: $15B initially, plus $35B despite missing conditions like an IPO or AI breakthrough. Does Amazon just love AI? 🎨Non |Fungible | Tokens Business Tips💳 |Crypto❤️
👍9🔥2❤1👏1
What are governance tokens? Governance tokens are a kind of cryptocurrency that gives you a certain amount of power. Holders of these coins have the right to vote on the future of a decentralized protocol—e.g., a DAO or DEX. Sometimes, governance tokens give you the power to bring ideas to the community for discussion, allow you to increase user income in farming and staking, allow you to voice your opinion, etc. …
🔥8👍2❤1💯1
🔐 BonkDAO treasury drained via governance exploit An attacker exploited BonkDAO's governance mechanism to drain 4.426 trillion BONK tokens from its treasury. The exploit allowed the attacker to pass a malicious proposal and withdraw the funds. Of the stolen tokens, 800 billion BONK have already been sold for approximately $2 million. The attacker still holds an estimated 2.4 trillion BONK, leaving significant sell …
👍8❤3🔥2👏1
🪙 Bitmine Bets on Ethereum's Corporate Adoption Bitmine believes Ethereum is entering a new phase where growth will be driven not by the crypto market but by widespread adoption from banks, corporations, and large companies. The company compares this trajectory to the transformations seen with Amazon, Nvidia, and JPMorgan. They suggest that if this scenario unfolds, ETH could eventually become the main unit of acco…
👍8❤3💯1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @NFTs_Crypto_TM. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NFTs Crypto💰” (@NFTs_Crypto_TM), 32,223 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NFTs_Crypto_TM.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.