Video, posted without a caption

Channel
Gift Decoder
@NFT_Gift_Decoder
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
856subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002822296351 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NFT_Gift_Decoder |
| Description | contact: @Xst1976 Канал посвещён TON комьюнити. Актуальные новости блокчена, подарков и телеграма. Chat: https://t.me/Unluck_Decoder_chat |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 5 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NFT_Gift_Decoder |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:18 | 856 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:18 | 856 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 5 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 83
- Videos
- 9
- Links
- 72
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
12 reactions across 6 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 5 | 41.7% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 25.0% | |
| custom 6012311317925337534 | 1 | 8.33% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 8.33% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 8.33% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 8.33% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2025 to 14 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Сколько нужно потратить для прокачки уровня? 1 — 1 ⭐ 2 — 5,000 ⭐ 3 — 12,000 ⭐ 4 — 19,000 ⭐ 5 — 27,000 ⭐ 6 — 36,000 ⭐ 7 — 46,000 ⭐ 8 — 57,000 ⭐ 9 — 68,000 ⭐ 10 — 81,000 ⭐ 11 — 94,000 ⭐ 12 — 107,000 ⭐ 13 — 120,000 ⭐ 14 — 133,000 ⭐ 15 — 146,000 ⭐ 16 — 160,000 ⭐ 17 — 173,000 ⭐ 18 — 186,000 ⭐ 19 — 199,000 ⭐ 20 — 212,000 ⭐ 21 — 225,000 ⭐ 22 — 238,000 ⭐ 23 — 251,000 ⭐ 24 — 265,000 ⭐ 25 — 278,000 ⭐ 26 — 291,000 ⭐ 27…
На первой картинке — я смотрю на подарок как на потенциальный покупатель. На второй — вид со стороны владельца подарка. Что имеем? Покупать подарки за TON нельзя. На текущий момент продавец может лишь выбрать, в чем он получит средства за подарки — в звездах или в TON. Покупатель в любом случае платит звездами. А вот вырученные таким образом TON можно потратить только на покупку рекламы в каналах 🙈
❤1
Доступны для передачи! 🎁 10000⭐️— can be transferred 🎁 5000⭐️— can be transferred 🎁 1000⭐️— can be transferred 🎁 500⭐️— can be transferred 🎁 200⭐️— can be transferred
🔥1
Сейчас снова пошла волна паники вокруг якобы «новых анонимных номеров» 😵💫 Как обычно, разгоняют это те, кто до конца не разобрался в теме и не имеет никакой экспертизы в сфере номеров. Тем не менее, они активно распространяют информацию, даже не удосужившись её проверить. Подобная шумиха поднимается регулярно примерно раз в полтора года. Сценарий всегда один и тот же: • Неделю все боятся, • Потом начинают понимать…
custom 60123113179253375341
правильные мысли
Новое обновление — ЗАЕБИСЬ! Очень грамотно, что Telegram делает ставку на коллекции и коллекционеров. Это как раз то, что может придать подаркам настоящую ценность в долгосрок. Создают культуру — а не двухнедельный хайп. Но Чеснок до сих пор видит в чатах недовольных, которые всё ещё ждут от подарков какое-то «утилити». Красиво, дорого вот вам главное утилити. Всё остальное — стейкинг, роялти, токены — попытка на…
👍5💯1
В Telegram появился рейтинг пользователей по ⭐️ Пока только на макбуках
да ты что, реально?
😢1
Нападения на блогера из за тг подарков 😱 Недавно произошел ужасный инцидент, на блогера Амана Тюрина напали. У него украли его аккаунт на сумму более 300 000$ и канал с 45 000 подписчиков. Злоумышленники связали его, избили, и подожгли его квартиру, с целью убить 😵💫 По данным, сейчас ведется расследование по данному делу👮♂️ Так же FreeMan (создатель тоннель) после данного инцидента заявил, что ввел биометрию в м…
Некоторые новые подарки торгуются в минус… Но они хотят выпустить еще десятки миллионов других подарков…
👇Старые telegram подарки снова падают в цене! 😏Mad Pumpkin -23.78%🔽 🎁Tama Gadget -23.64%🔽 🎁Gem Signet -23.42%🔽 🎁Cupid Charm -23.08%🔽 🎁Sleigh Bell -22.74%🔽 🎁Precious Peach -22.2%🔽 🐸Kissed Frog -21.46%🔽 🎩Top Hat -21.18%🔽 🌺Skull Flower -21.16%🔽 🎁Vintage Cigar -20.68%🔽 💀Electric Skull -20.08%🔽 🎁Toy Bear -19.84%🔽 🎁Snow Globe -19.79%🔽 🔮Crystal Bell -19.54%🔽 🎁Love Potion -19.19%🔽 📊В среднем падение составляет -20% за 24 ч
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @NFT_Gift_Decoder. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Gift Decoder” (@NFT_Gift_Decoder), 856 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NFT_Gift_Decoder.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.