2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 138–140 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 22:45
139
no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:43
139
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 19 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
25
Videos
6
Links
29
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
2m 26s
Average length
49s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
134 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👀
27
20.1%
🔥
23
17.2%
✍
22
16.4%
😁
21
15.7%
🤔
12
8.96%
🤯
12
8.96%
👍
10
7.46%
😎
4
2.99%
🤨
3
2.24%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 134reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 19 December 2025 to 23 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
76
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 18 we hold a reading for · 28%
Most on one post
50
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @NFTDevOps. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 December 2025 to 23 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
💎 BREAKING! #MTONGA
Change submitted to national registry:
- 15th May 2026
Change got into legal power:
- 20th May 2026
[...] Persons who have left the foundation and whose signatures have been cancelled: Crown, Maximilian, German national, in Dubai (AE), member of the board of trustees, with sole signatory authority, chairman of the management board, with sole signatory authority.
Note:
- Seo Ro Yun (Steve) and …
🤖 ClawdBot OpenClaw doesn't give a f*ck when it comes to onboarding new users to Telegram
Millions of views on YouTube, oh come on 😔
TON ecosystem smoking in the corner because nobody could deliver a one-click AI investment solution for a year.
Someone's missing a great business opportunity for sure...
🤖 Warning to all AI bot developers
We can notice a surge of AI bots popularity within Telegram.
Reminder: don't give too much power to your AI bot, because...
Gilfoyle from Silicon Valley made the Anton AI, and it f*cked everything up.
https://youtube.com/shorts/RbxzYcU3Jsg
💎 Tether & TON
Tether Operations, a worldwide known company that controls USD₮, XAU₮, and USA₮, among other cryptocurrencies, spent last year developing the WDK (Wallet Development Kit).
The WDK allows developers to easily integrate different blockchains and coins into their products.
The supported ones on the WDK include: BTC, EVM, Solana, Spark, TRON, and TON!
The WDK features the BIP-44 standard, multi-account…
❤️ TON Gateway 2026 - what to expect?
If you try just a little harder, you can decrypt the videos and posts which are being advertised by the TON Foundation regarding GTW26.
Before "leaking" it — I apologize to one of my channel subscribers — I couldn't hold it... paper hands.
The answer is in this video.
P.S. Just kidding! Only the TON Foundation knows what will be shown during the conference.
...if for some re…
🤖 Cocoon Billing
The following text is just a plain prediction...
Just a reminder that some time ago Telegram released Gateway API - a service for sending confirmation codes for other apps/websites instead of using SMS.
Gateway API is a pre-paid service and is billed in TON - you can top up balance via Fragment.
So, regarding last Cocoon documentation changes, there's a big chance that we'll see some changes on F…
🤖 Cocoon News
Just noticed some new content changes in the "official" documentation:
- now it mentions the upcoming official Cocoon chatbot;
- there will be public API-to-client endpoints - no need to run expensive client servers;
- for both communication methods mentioned above - it also states that it'll be billed using TON (no mentions about Stars), though if you run Cocoon "client" yourself you can indirectly…
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @NFTDevOps. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 569,865 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NFT DevOps ☕️” (@NFTDevOps), 139 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NFTDevOps.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.