Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Блубери | Путь к обогащению

@NFTBlueberryCommunity

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

2,423subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001892569150
TypeChannel
Username@NFTBlueberryCommunity
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/NFTBlueberryCommunity

Growth

2,4162,4232,419.57 August 2026 — 2,416 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,416 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,418 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,423 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,415–2,424 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 20:352,423+5
8 Aug 2026, 04:372,418+2
7 Aug 2026, 05:302,416no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:182,416first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 18 July 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

304 reactions across 18 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10434.2%
👍7324.0%
🔥6019.7%
👎258.22%
😁82.63%
😭61.97%
🍾51.64%
👀51.64%
🫡51.64%
🐳41.32%
🤔41.32%
🤝30.987%
💯20.658%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 304reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2025 to 6 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
395
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 18 we hold a reading for · 22%
Most on one post
343
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @NFTBlueberryCommunity. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 July 2025 to 6 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Jul 2026, 15:02 UTC533 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Есть ли вообще сильные криптаны? Наверно многие из вас уже заметили, что последние полтора года я достаточно плотно занимаюсь спортом. За это время получилось неплохо прибавить в силовых, но всегда было интересно сравнить себя с кем-то из нашей сферы. Поэтому мы с Мазза Корнером решили встретиться в зале и устроить дружеский замер силы. Проверили: - жим лёжа - подтягивания - подъём на бицепс Если честно, то я при

7👎5👍3🔥2

18 May 2026, 20:06 UTC975 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Лично мне надоело, что почти все VPN нестабильны, быстро отлетают. У меня есть отличный вариант для тебя) Prosto VPN - 3 дня бесплатного доступа, можете попробовать и если все устроит, то оформить месячную подписку за цену стаканчика кофе. t.me/prostovpnrubot

7👎6😁5👍1🔥1

12 Jan 2026, 14:01 UTC≈1,880 views20 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Я снова начал снимать на YouTube! Без громких обещаний. Без «начни с понедельника». Путь с нуля, но с пониманием куда идти. Или нет? https://youtu.be/g_ETOHCP13E?si=b4rQIUspyK0tTrcl

👍134🔥2😭1

31 Dec 2025, 20:03 UTC≈1,280 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Blueberia69

Не буду подводить итоги этого года, как делал раньше. Кто был в этом канале все видели. Сейчас мне просто хочется молчать. Давай без новогодних иллюзий, завтра ничего не изменится, не будет новых нас. Если сегодня не начал, то завтра тоже не начнешь, только потому что сменилась дата. С наступающим ❤️

8👀1🤔1

18 Dec 2025, 13:06 UTC≈1,210 views20 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Blueberia69Photo

Цель 169 тренировок за год выполнена! Всем привет! Этот пост стоит твоего внимания, потому что к этой цели я шел целый год. Хочу сразу же поблагодарить всех вас в этом канале, всех кто поддерживал, ставил реакции, писал комментарии, сильно обнимаю, а сейчас к посту. За этот год я видел как другие сдаются, да и я не раз хотел забить на все эти дела огромный болт, но я здесь, пишу это сообщение, а значит у меня все

9🔥7👍4

22 Sept 2025, 11:33 UTC≈2,360 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Добейте 400 в щитпосте 🙏🏻

9

11 Sept 2025, 11:32 UTC≈2,680 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Флипаем тг подарки в моем щитпосте 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻

🔥104👍4

9 Sept 2025, 16:05 UTC≈2,210 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Blueberia69

История продаж сумок за вчера. За пару дней до сделки выставил сумку с фоном ОниксБлэк на тг-маркет, где цены выше, чем на Portal. Два дня писали люди, но все предлагали Fake TON. Вчера написал покупатель, сказал, что хочет без скама и готов через сторонние маркеты. Я снял сумку с тг-маркета, закинул на Portal, но он им не пользовался, попросил Tonnel. Там ликвидность ниже, цены выше, и он согласился на 250 TON (хо

👍135🔥4

8 Sept 2025, 13:01 UTC≈1,500 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня прекрасный день, особенно когда продаешь все сумки выше флора 🎁 Больше месяца я пытался продать все эти сумки. Как раз последний месяц сумки вообще перестали покупать, ликвидность в коллекции упала, да и флор тоже в целом. Но сегодня вышло продать все разом, так еще и у меня теперь есть + одна забавная история. Кстати ее расскажу в щитпосте.

🔥62👍2

26 Aug 2025, 17:01 UTC≈1,650 views13 reactions50 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Telegram незаметно превратил цифровые подарки в NFT, а ты до сих пор пропускаешь это мимо себя?! 🎁Наконец-то решил написать пост про телеграмм подарки. Считаю, что имею какую-то насмотренность, чтобы делиться этим с вами. Начинал покупать подарки с самых олдовых Хэллоуинских и закончил тем, что сейчас постоянно флипаю подарки и делюсь этим в своем щитпосте. Пост будет достаточно вводный, но я продолжу вводить вас бо

9👍2🔥2

25 Aug 2025, 15:24 UTC≈1,200 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎁🎁🎁OpenSea подписались на TON! Я как и многие, кто следит за TON или движухой с телеграмм подарками с интересом отреагировал на эту инфу. Кто-то начал шиллить в твиттере, что OS подписались на TON, а TON написали доброе утро OS и тем самым они просто перекинулись приветствиями. Я лично на всю эту движуху смотрю с недоверием, не думаю, что будет какой-то коллаб, скорее это просто обмен любезностями для привлечения в

👎10👍51

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @NFTBlueberryCommunity. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 241,355 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Блубери | Путь к обогащению” (@NFTBlueberryCommunity), 2,423 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NFTBlueberryCommunity.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.