Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for NFC x 3D 【 Nfc 碰碰 App】

Channel

NFC x 3D 【 Nfc 碰碰 App】

@NFCx3DxApp

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

25subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001107610625
TypeChannel
Username@NFCx3DxApp
Created10 June 2017measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/NFCx3DxApp

Growth

2325248 August 2026 — 23 subscribers11 August 2026 — 23 subscribers25 August 2026 — 25 subscribers8 August 202625 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 16 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23–25 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 03:2225+2
11 Aug 2026, 12:0323no change
8 Aug 2026, 20:3223first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 10 June 2017the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.0%
avg views ÷ 25 subscribers
Avg views / post
7.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held17 (10 June 20177 August 2026)
Views total7
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
49s
Average length
49s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC7 viewsread 11 August 2026

😍 NFC 传卡种类 😍 💳 QR 内部 💳 TX 内部 💳 鲲鹏 (外卡) 💳 哪咤 💳 紫苹果 💳 瑞幸 💳 雷电 💳 闪电 💳 谷歌钱包 (超级推荐扫货) 💰 U9 (银联版) 💰 鲲鹏 (银联版) English language available ! Dm us : @Pos3D

20 Jul 2026, 09:47 UTC17 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @newNFC3DPhoto

☀️ 买手不再害怕 ☀️ 目前最新款最安全扫货 NFC 软件! @NFC3D

16 Jul 2026, 09:58 UTC22 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @newNFC3DVideo

⭐️ 宇宙最强扫货 NFC 软件 ⭐️ ☄️ 为提升买手们的安全与扫货体验,本产品完全替代了绿钱包,并完成了史诗级的更新 : 1. 可以自行更换卡面 2. 可以自行增加商家名称与消费金额与货币 3. 卡面不会掉,完全模仿真实钱包 4. 开通流通协议,不间断更新消除风控 5. 新软件,还未被重点标记,出水更顺利 @Pos3D

24 Jun 2026, 11:00 UTC36 viewsread 11 August 2026

🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰 内部码 一对一 有后台自己更新 唯一缺点 国内一些偏远地区 连接不了 可是全球大部分地区可触及 @Pos3D

27 May 2026, 07:55 UTC40 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

📣📣📣 "此读卡器不接受xxxx" 这行文字请忽略,不影响操作。 📣📣📣 租号找我 : Qr 内部 / Tx 紫苹果新版 雷电 哪咤 闪电 鲲鹏外版 鲲鹏银联 @Pos3D

6 May 2026, 10:06 UTC42 viewsread 11 August 2026

🫠 NFC App Channel 🫠 For those users who currently using QR Code applications, if you require more private NFC software or other user-friendly NFC software, you can refer to the list below : ✅Friendly and Cheap : Nazha NFC Purple Apple NFC ✅Good and Popular : Thunder NFC Kunpeng NFC Kuromi NFC CardWallet ✅High End and Excellent ✅Support 3 groups of users at the same time Lightning NFC ✅China Union Pay Kunpeng UP

4 May 2026, 08:46 UTC42 viewsread 11 August 2026

✅ 目前 NFC 软件 : 内部专用 TX 紫苹果 哪咤 库洛米 鲲鹏 绿钱包 雷电 闪电 @perfectiontrading

24 Apr 2026, 06:37 UTC47 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

最近有客户问出现这个是不是传卡失败,可以忽略,正常传卡就行,不影响传卡使用。🙏 ❤️ 目前NFC软件有 : 最低价 👉 哪吒,紫苹果,Kuromi 好用爆款 👉 雷电,绿钱包,鲲鹏 类似内部多对多 👉 闪电 银联 👉 鲲鹏内版 @perfectiontrading

23 Feb 2026, 09:08 UTC88 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

QR App available ! Chinese ✅ English ✅ Korea ✅ Thailand ✅

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @NFCx3DxApp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,384,635 of 1,621,120entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“NFC x 3D 【 Nfc 碰碰 App】” (@NFCx3DxApp), 25 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NFCx3DxApp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.