Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

НЕ ПЯТЁРКА

@NE_5OPKA

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

29,580subscribers

-53 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002040056997
TypeChannel
Username@NE_5OPKA
DescriptionПредложить новость / Реклама — @ne5opka_bot Правила обсуждения — clck.ru/3LFcCC Сайт — https://ne5opka.ru/ № 5067379355
Created13 December 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/NE_5OPKA

Growth

29,58029,63429,6076 August 2026 — 29,633 subscribers6 August 2026 — 29,634 subscribers7 August 2026 — 29,618 subscribers8 August 2026 — 29,597 subscribers9 August 2026 — 29,592 subscribers10 August 2026 — 29,600 subscribers11 August 2026 — 29,583 subscribers12 August 2026 — 29,580 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -53. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,572–29,642 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 09:4929,580-3
11 Aug 2026, 12:0729,583-17
10 Aug 2026, 12:1729,600+8
9 Aug 2026, 14:1229,592-5
8 Aug 2026, 14:2229,597-21
7 Aug 2026, 11:4329,618-16
6 Aug 2026, 09:2129,634+1
6 Aug 2026, 03:4729,633first reading

Engagement

45 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.0%
avg views ÷ 29,580 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,790
45 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.75%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
45
of 45 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held45 (2 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total305,500
Reactions total8,394
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 21:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,360
Videos
1,220
Links
3,910

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
48m 49s
Average length
2m 19s

Measured directly from 21 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

7,339 reactions across 39 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,98240.6%
😭1,24417.0%
😁89012.1%
❤‍🔥81911.2%
😢80210.9%
🍌6028.20%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 45 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,394reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 17:36 UTC≈3,200 views89 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#mzlff проводит совместный стрим с Лидой twitch.tv/mazellovvv ❌ НЕ ПЯТЁРКА

🍌6022😭7

12 Aug 2026, 11:39 UTC≈4,830 views127 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#Стинт представил трек-лист альбома «чел, тебе 30» Помимо сингла-фита с Братишкиным, на альбоме, как и говорилось до этого, появятся Лида и Мазеллов. ❌ НЕ ПЯТЁРКА

🍌81❤‍🔥2912😭5

12 Aug 2026, 09:29 UTC≈5,350 views203 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

#Ханов завершил свой донатофон — он простримил 800+ часов В последние минуты марафона Саша поблагодарил зрителей за то, что провели с ним это время, и рассказал, что недоволен проведённым донатофоном. По его мнению, на стриме не хватало активностей, а он сам себя сдерживал. ❌ НЕ ПЯТЁРКА

166😢25😭8😁3🍌1

11 Aug 2026, 17:36 UTC≈6,450 views188 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

#Пятёрка рассказал о мошеннической схеме с рекламодателем компьютерной периферии По словам Кирилла, на эту схему уже попался Ханов, у которого украли три тысячи долларов с криптокошелька, а под удар могли попасть как минимум Заквиель и Дрейк. Схема скам-рекламодателя заключалась в том, чтобы предложить стримеру прорекламировать мышки, клавиатуры и прочие девайсы, а оплату прислать в криптовалюте. Но вместо перевода

❤‍🔥118😭46😁204

11 Aug 2026, 15:13 UTC≈6,550 views97 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#Както проводит «Свою игру» с Фриклендовцами Состав: Пятёрка, Ханов, Ека, Ксепом, Ваасем и Водудов twitch.tv/cacto0o ❌ НЕ ПЯТЁРКА

79❤‍🔥18

11 Aug 2026, 11:29 UTC≈6,540 views91 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

#Стинт представил сниппет трека «Туда-сюда», который войдёт в состав альбома «чел, тебе 30» ❌ НЕ ПЯТЁРКА

72❤‍🔥10🍌9

11 Aug 2026, 07:59 UTC≈6,560 views100 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

#Пятёрка про изменение игрового рейтинга Minecraft Кирилл сразу не согласился с мнением, что рейтинг пересматривается из-за «масштабного обновления». Он думает, что здесь замешано введение нового вида монетизации, а подвязал это к решению сделать из Майнкрафта что-то подобное Роблоксу. Также Кириллу понравилась мысль, что пересмотр рейтинга может производиться из-за введения подключения к другим игрокам через списо

86❤‍🔥7😁7

11 Aug 2026, 07:11 UTC≈6,140 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

9😢5❤‍🔥2😁2🍌1

10 Aug 2026, 11:04 UTC≈3,670 views167 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @thefencemusicVideo

В преддверии ТУСЫ МЕДУЗЫ посвятили Артура в 42!🥳 😎Считаем, достойно пресейва: music.thefence.me/pstusameduza

❤‍🔥124🍌2419

10 Aug 2026, 10:12 UTC≈6,740 views123 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#Неркин про изменение игрового рейтинга Minecraft Сегодня на сайте игры пропали иконки рейтингов PEGI/ESRB. Многие «эксперты» уже выдвинули теории, что игре пересматривают рейтинг из-за некого «масштабного обновления». По мнению Юры, пересмотр рейтинга не может указывать на величину обновления. По его словам, обновление могут сделать крупным и без этого пересмотра, но рейтинг вполне могут изменить из-за какой-то но

🍌9029❤‍🔥4

9 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC≈7,830 views490 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

#MellSher рассказал, что на «Супер Дупер Нове» мог появиться Лида По словам Игоря, когда Кирилл предложил Коле фитануть и скинул треки, куда он бы мог залететь, Лида ответил им: «Пошли нахуй оба». ❌ НЕ ПЯТЁРКА

332😁114😭37🍌7

Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @NE_5OPKA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 83,077 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Мысли Жопера | 5opka - Пятёрка
@joper5 · 177,429
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“НЕ ПЯТЁРКА” (@NE_5OPKA), 29,580 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NE_5OPKA.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.