Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
29 measurements spanning 34 days, net -444. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,955–14,533 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Sept 2026, 15:38
14,022
-49
7 Sept 2026, 11:00
14,071
-40
4 Sept 2026, 16:41
14,111
-11
3 Sept 2026, 00:13
14,122
-10
1 Sept 2026, 19:34
14,132
-14
31 Aug 2026, 20:25
14,146
-18
30 Aug 2026, 17:55
14,164
-15
29 Aug 2026, 16:34
14,179
-10
28 Aug 2026, 14:02
14,189
-15
27 Aug 2026, 16:24
14,204
-9
26 Aug 2026, 18:38
14,213
-11
25 Aug 2026, 15:38
14,224
-17
24 Aug 2026, 16:15
14,241
-9
22 Aug 2026, 23:23
14,250
-20
21 Aug 2026, 10:25
14,270
-12
20 Aug 2026, 10:44
14,282
-11
19 Aug 2026, 13:42
14,293
-25
18 Aug 2026, 15:02
14,318
-10
17 Aug 2026, 18:28
14,328
-15
16 Aug 2026, 15:37
14,343
first reading
Engagement
24 posts held, back to 16 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.81%
avg views ÷ 14,022 subscribers
Avg views / post
394
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.262%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 24 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026
Posts held
24 (16 April 2026 – 30 August 2026)
Views total
1,574
Reactions total
3
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 19:05 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
19s
Average length
19s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
54 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
43
79.6%
👍
3
5.56%
🤔
3
5.56%
😁
2
3.70%
👏
1
1.85%
😢
1
1.85%
🥰
1
1.85%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 16 April 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚀 JEE Aspirants — Meet JEEVibe
Join 500+ JEE aspirants already practicing smarter with JEEVibe.
JEEVibe doesn’t just give you more questions. It helps you find where your thinking goes wrong — and what to work on next.
🎁 Get 30 Days of JEEVibe Pro FREE
With JEEVibe, you get:
✅ Chapter-wise Practice
✅ Daily Adaptive Quiz
✅ Personalized Thinking Analytics
✅ Snap & Solve — snap a JEE problem and get help
🌐 Practice…
In an Alternating Current (A.C.) circuit context, what is the default interpretation of the term 'power transmission'?
A. Apparent power transmission11%
B. Peak power transmission16%
C. Average power transmission54%
D. Instantaneous power transmission35%
The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
According to Sidgwick's Rule, what is the primary objective of a metal cation when forming a coordination complex?
A. To form as many metal-metal bonds as possible28%
B. To eliminate all lone pairs from ligands22%
C. To achieve a noble gas configuration46%
D. To maximize its oxidation state18%
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
What happens to the deformation x of an ideal spring if the applied force at both ends is doubled while the spring remains in equilibrium?
A. The deformation x becomes zero as the forces cancel out.23%
B. The deformation x is doubled.34%
C. The deformation x is halved.15%
D. The deformation x remains the same because the forces are balanced.43%
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
In the equivalent circuit representation of a moving rod in a magnetic field, the rod is modeled as which of the following components?
A. A battery with an internal resistance R.46%
B. A pure capacitor with no energy loss.20%
C. A constant current source with infinite resistance.28%
D. A transformer that steps up the magnetic field strength.32%
The shares total 126%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
If the minute hand of a clock moves for 12 minutes, what is the angle subtended by it at the centre?
A. 6°16%
B. 60°29%
C. 72°42%
D. 12°19%
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
In the excited state of a Carbon atom (C), how are the electrons distributed across the valence orbitals before hybridisation occurs?
A. Two electrons in 2s and one electron in each of the three 2p orbitals.21%
B. One electron in 2s and three electrons in 2p.29%
C. Two electrons in 2s and two electrons in 2p.40%
D. Four electrons in the 2p subshell only.17%
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @NEET_2027_Test_Papers. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 17 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
In an Alternating Current (A.C.) circuit context, what is the default interpretation of the term 'power transmission'?
A. Apparent power transmission11%
B. Peak power transmission16%
C. Average power transmission54%
D. Instantaneous power transmission35%
The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
According to Sidgwick's Rule, what is the primary objective of a metal cation when forming a coordination complex?
A. To form as many metal-metal bonds as possible28%
B. To eliminate all lone pairs from ligands22%
C. To achieve a noble gas configuration46%
D. To maximize its oxidation state18%
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
What happens to the deformation x of an ideal spring if the applied force at both ends is doubled while the spring remains in equilibrium?
A. The deformation x becomes zero as the forces cancel out.23%
B. The deformation x is doubled.34%
C. The deformation x is halved.15%
D. The deformation x remains the same because the forces are balanced.43%
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
In the equivalent circuit representation of a moving rod in a magnetic field, the rod is modeled as which of the following components?
A. A battery with an internal resistance R.46%
B. A pure capacitor with no energy loss.20%
C. A constant current source with infinite resistance.28%
D. A transformer that steps up the magnetic field strength.32%
The shares total 126%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Which of the following is a better proton donor acid and why?
A. CHCl₃, because the conjugate base is stabilized by d-orbital backbonding.36%
B. CHF₃, because it cannot undergo any backbonding.12%
C. CHF₃, because Fluorine is more electronegative than Chlorine.28%
D. CHCl₃, because the C–Cl bond is weaker than the C–F bond.24%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 16 April 2026 to 30 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ATHARVA AGGARWAL OFFICIAL @AtharvaAggarwal · 57,126 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NEET UG POLLS ✨ | PCB Daily Practice Questions for NEET 2027” (@NEET_2027_Test_Papers), 14,022 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NEET_2027_Test_Papers.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
