🇺🇦 Новини Бериславського району та Херсонщини. Оперативно про головне в Україні та світі.
🇬🇧 News of Berislav, Kherson & Ukraine.
🇵🇱 Wiadomości z Chersonia, Berysławia i Ukrainy.
🤖 Наш бот для зв'язку: @Beryslav_news_bot
Created
Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net +24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,554–7,586 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 03:42
7,582
+13
7 Aug 2026, 20:22
7,569
+11
7 Aug 2026, 10:15
7,558
no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:03
7,558
first reading
Engagement
86 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
35.3%
avg views ÷ 7,582 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,670
86 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.88%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
86
of 86 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
86 (6 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
229,969
Reactions total
4,328
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 17:19 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈16,300
Videos
≈6,010
Links
≈17,400
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
6m 38s
Average length
50s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,328 reactions across 86 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😢
981
22.7%
❤
770
17.8%
🤬
597
13.8%
😭
560
12.9%
🔥
463
10.7%
🙏
319
7.37%
👍
243
5.61%
😡
66
1.52%
👏
62
1.43%
🤣
43
0.994%
😱
37
0.855%
👎
36
0.832%
💯
35
0.809%
😁
31
0.716%
🤯
20
0.462%
🎉
18
0.416%
🥰
10
0.231%
🤔
9
0.208%
👀
5
0.116%
👌
5
0.116%
7 further kinds
18
0.416%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 86 of the 86 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,328reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 86 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сьогодні віддали останню шану Ульянюку Руслану Івановичу — жителю Нововоронцовської громади, який віддав своє життя за Україну.
Із 8 жовтня 2024 року Руслан Іванович вважався зниклим безвісти. Згодом стало відомо, що саме того дня, виконуючи бойове завдання на Курському напрямку, він загинув у бою, до останнього залишаючись вірним військовій присязі та Україні.
Він віддав найдорожче — своє життя — за свободу рідної…
Рівень бідності в Україні за час повномасштабної війни зріс майже вдвічі — до 41,6%
За оцінками Світового банку, у 2025 році частка населення за межею бідності зросла з 37% до 41,6%.
Найбільше постраждали малозабезпечені домогосподарства: їхні реальні доходи скоротилися більш ніж на 30%. Водночас у найбільш забезпечених вони зросли понад 10%.
Близько 70% домогосподарств наприкінці 2025 року заявили про погіршення …
🧐 Чоловіка засудили до майже 8 років ув’язнення через те, що він викрав 13 шоколадок із магазину в Миколаєві, — суд
Чотири шоколадки він подарував своїй знайомій, дві з’їв, а інші — загубив, тікаючи з крамниці.
🚌 У Борозенській громаді тимчасово призупиняють соціальні перевезення
З 15 серпня у Борозенській громаді тимчасово припинять соціальні перевезення.
Цього тижня автобуси гуманітарної місії «Проліска» курсуватимуть востаннє перед перервою.
Причина — проведення повторного тендеру, який орієнтовно триватиме близько двох тижнів.
📢 Про відновлення соціальних маршрутів мешканців громади повідомлять додатково.
Джерело: …
⚡️ 28 загиблих і 183 поранених: наслідки російських атак на Бериславщину від початку року
Від початку року внаслідок російських обстрілів Бериславського району загинули 28 мирних жителів, ще 183 людини отримали поранення.
За словами начальника Бериславської РВА Володимира Літвінова, ворог систематично атакує район дронами, артилерією та авіабомбами.
Лише протягом 10 серпня під ворожим вогнем перебували 9 із 11 гро…
☄️ 1630-та доба спротиву: Бериславщина під ворожим вогнем
Протягом минулої доби російські окупанти обстрілювали 7 громад Бериславського району: Бериславську, Новоолександрівську, Нововоронцовську, Борозенську, Новорайську, Великоолександрівську та Тягинську.
🔫 Артилерійські обстріли:
▪️ м. Берислав
▪️ с. Золота Балка
▪️ с. Шевченківка
▪️ с. Бургунка
▪️ с. Тягинка
⚡️ Атаки БпЛА:
▪️ м. Берислав
▪️ с. Урожайне
▪️ с. …
💥 Вночі Новоросійськ був під масованою атакою добрих дронів.
У місті численні пожежі та руйнування. пе ве о рознесло кілька будинків.
Був уражений порт. Також є інформація про влучання у Новоросійський зерновий термінал.
Це один із ключових та найбільших портових елеваторів росії на Чорному морі, призначений для перевалки зернових та олійних культур на експорт
Новини Бериславського району.
https://t.me/Beryslav_n…
Атака дронів зупинила роботу найбільшого заводу скрапленого газу в рф, — Reuters
11 серпня на Санкт-Петербурзькій міжнародній товарній біржі не виставили жодного обсягу скрапленого газу для відвантаження з Тобольська. Раніше з цього пункту щодня продавали близько 4 тисяч метричних тонн технічної суміші пропану та бутану.
➡️ За даними галузевих джерел, «ЗапСибНефтехим» виробляє близько 6 млн тонн сировини на рік, що…
+1260 🐽💩☠️🇷🇺🥰⚰️
Новини Бериславського району.
https://t.me/Beryslav_news_bot
🔥39👍3👎2
Showing the 12 most recent of 86 posts we hold for @NB_3993. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@NB_3993 edited 6 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
7 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 245,501 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
3
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
3
vacant every time we have ever looked
@NB_3993 named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@beryslavmrbot named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@berislavnewsbot named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@beryslavrda_bot named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Новини Бериславського району” (@NB_3993), 7,582 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NB_3993.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
