Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for NBDN

Channel

NBDN

@NBDNBcult

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2,386subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001725084871
TypeChannel
Username@NBDNBcult
Created7 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/NBDNBcult

Growth

2,3862,3922,3897 August 2026 — 2,392 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,392 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,390 subscribers15 August 2026 — 2,386 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,385–2,393 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 01:562,386-4
11 Aug 2026, 14:152,390-2
7 Aug 2026, 15:012,392no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:472,392first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 28 March 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
8m 57s
Average length
8m 57s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

536 reactions across 11 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤡16430.6%
14126.3%
🔥7914.7%
😁5410.1%
🤣356.53%
🗿152.80%
❤‍🔥132.43%
👍112.05%
🌚40.746%
👎40.746%
👨‍💻40.746%
🥰40.746%
🍾30.56%
💅20.373%
🤨20.373%
🤯10.187%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 536reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 28 March 2023 to 17 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2025, 14:36 UTC954 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @gevmuassecretVideo

Video, posted without a caption

🔥6

17 Aug 2025, 14:36 UTC957 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @gevmuassecret

Выложил подробный урок с обзором аккаунта бренда Too Faced, он будет полезен креаторам и всем кто хочет сотрудничать с брендами Подписывайся на закрытый канал, далее разбираю Rhode, urban decay, Rare beauty, Fenty beauty, и после этого я начинаю разбирать российские бренды Подписаться ТЫК сюда💅

🔥72

6 May 2023, 11:55 UTC≈4,590 views78 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

56❤‍🔥13🔥9

4 May 2023, 09:24 UTC≈3,090 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Такую неприкрытую колхозную тупость выдала в своих сторис стилист Карина Нигай

🤡18🗿15🤣4👍1

3 May 2023, 18:54 UTC≈2,570 views65 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

65

10 Apr 2023, 06:31 UTC≈3,100 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

В чью эстетику окунемся?

  1. Марк Джейкобс48%
  2. Гуччи36%
  3. Ковали16%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍103👎1

8 Apr 2023, 09:08 UTC≈2,760 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

🤣28😁52🤯1

8 Apr 2023, 08:08 UTC≈2,780 views51 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Молчание, значит хватает всего😅🤣 Продолжаем

😁39🤡53👎2🤨2

6 Apr 2023, 08:22 UTC≈3,120 views49 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Чего вам не хватает в постах?

🤡19😁104🌚4👨‍💻4🍾3🤣3💅2

28 Mar 2023, 12:02 UTC≈3,560 views68 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

В коллекции AW14 Dolce & Gabbana взяли за основу искусство Византии Византийское искусство охватывает нехилый период 300-1400 годов. Доменико и Стефано вдохновились Средневековьем и играли в спорную тему — религию. Вообще-то для 2010-х вполне себе нормальная эстетика дорого-богато, ещё и с коронами на головах. Помню, даже мемы были: «Единственная шапка, которая мне идёт». Коллекция состоит из одежды и аксессуаров,

🔥576🥰4👎1

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @NBDNBcult. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Apr 2023, 06:31 UTCAnonymous Poll585 voters

В чью эстетику окунемся?

  1. Марк Джейкобс48%
  2. Гуччи36%
  3. Ковали16%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 28 March 2023 to 17 August 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“NBDN” (@NBDNBcult), 2,386 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NBDNBcult.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.