Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

سیاسیون_مطالعات قاره آمریکا

@NAmericaSt

On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

1,381subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001252551273
TypeChannel
Username@NAmericaSt
Created10 April 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/NAmericaSt

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

1,3811,3831,3826 August 2026 — 1,383 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,383 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,382 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,381 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 3 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,381–1,383 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 04:111,381-1
7 Aug 2026, 07:451,382-1
6 Aug 2026, 16:351,383no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:221,383first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 September 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

11 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍545.5%
🤔327.3%
218.2%
😁19.09%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 September 2024 to 7 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Jun 2025, 16:29 UTC844 views0 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @PoliticalStPhoto

ترکمنچای خیانت یا خدمت ؟ درس‌هایی برای مذاکرات امروز ایران برای مشاهده این ویدیو در یوتیوب کلمه ( سیاسیون ) را سرچ بفرمایید

31 May 2025, 17:03 UTC881 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @PoliticalStPhoto

مکانیزم ماشهِ که اروپایی‌ها میخان فعال کنند چیه و چرا در برجام هست ؟ برای مشاهده این ویدیو در یوتیوب کلمه ( سیاسیون ) را سرچ بفرمایید

29 May 2025, 22:05 UTC738 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @PoliticalSt

دنیای سیاست بسیار پیچیده‌تر از آن است که یک مغز باهوش اما سادهِ اقتصادی آن‌ را درک کند

👍2

29 May 2025, 22:05 UTC695 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @entekhab_irPhoto

♦️ ایلان ماسک رسما از دولت ترامپ خارج شد 🔹 ایلان ماسک از دونالد ترامپ بابت فرصتی که به او داده شده تشکر کرده و ابراز امیدواری کرده که «وزارت کارآمدی دولت» همچنان به کاستن بودجه و پرسنل دولت فدرال با هدف «کارآمد» کردن آن و صرفه‌جویی در بودجه، ادامه دهد. جزئیات در👇👇 https://www.entekhab.ir/003dzc 🆔 @Entekhab_ir

1

17 May 2025, 15:21 UTC495 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @PoliticalStPhoto

ایران و آمریکا چه توافقی می‌کنند ؟ نقش عرب ها چیست ؟ برای مشاهده این ویدیو در یوتیوب کلمه ( سیاسیون ) را سرچ بفرمایید

👍1

16 May 2025, 22:40 UTC469 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @PoliticalStPoll

به نظر شما، مهم‌ترین دلیل شکست مذاکرات ایران و آمریکا چیست؟

  1. بی‌اعتمادی متقابل28%
  2. دخالت کشورهای دیگر13%
  3. فشار داخلی در ایران19%
  4. زیاده‌خواهی آمریکا40%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Apr 2025, 09:21 UTC611 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @DrFardinGhoreishi

✳️ چرا انتخاب استیو ویتکاف برای مذاکره مهم است؟ ✍ فردین قریشی استاد دانشگاه تهران ❇️ در آستانه مذاکرات غیرمستقیم ایران و آمریکا در روز شنبه ۲۳ فروردین در عمان، جزئیاتی که در ظاهر فرعی به نظر می‌رسند، گاه حامل پیام‌های راهبردی مهم‌تری از متن مذاکرات هستند. یکی از این جزئیات، انتخاب نماینده آمریکاست: استیو ویتکاف. این انتخاب از منظر دیپلماسی و نظریه بازی‌ها، سیگنالی نرم اما تعیین‌کننده است. در ارتباط با این بحث توجه

2 Apr 2025, 09:15 UTC508 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @Karimipour_K

قلاب های ترامپ ۱-کانادا دومین کشور پهناور جهان باید ایالت ۵۱ ام ایالات متحده شود؛ ۲-گرینلند پهناورترین جزیره جهان به زور هم‌ که شده باید از دانمارک جدا شده و تحت مالکیت آمریکا در آید؛ ۳- نام قدیمی خلیج مکزیک به خلیج آمریکا تغییر داده شود؛۴- کانال پاناما دوباره تحت سیطره آمریکا درآید؛ ۵- جنگ روسیه-اکراین فوری پایان یافته و ترک مخاصمه شود؛ ۶- تعرفه بر کالاهای وارداتی چین به آمریکا دستکم‌ تا ۲۵٪ افزایش یافته و پکن حق ا

20 Mar 2025, 19:13 UTC484 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @MHGholamiK

آرزوی بهترین اتفاقات رو براتون در سال جدید دارم انشاالله که یک پناهگاه با بخاری و سرویس بهداشتی تمیز گیرتون بیاد !

🤔3😁1

27 Dec 2024, 09:06 UTC847 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @PoliticalStPhoto

💬 چرا ایران دیگر جایی در مذاکرات جهانی ندارد؟ در این ویدیو به بررسی دلایل اصلی عدم حضور ایران در مذاکرات بین‌المللی و روابط پیچیده‌اش با کشورهای غربی می‌پردازیم. از تحریم‌ها تا چالش‌های دیپلماتیک، همه‌چیز رو بررسی کرده‌ایم! 🔴 برای دیدن تحلیل کامل، ویدیو رو تماشا کنید!

21 Dec 2024, 09:00 UTC783 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @PoliticalStPhoto

تحلیل سیاست خارجی آمریکا، چین و روسیه؛ قدرت در کجای جهان متمرکز است؟ برای مشاهده ویدیو در یوتیوب کلمه (سیاسیون) را سرچ بفرمایید

22 Nov 2024, 15:48 UTC832 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @PoliticalStPhoto

بمب اتم برای ایران بازدارندگی یا خودکشی ؟ مناظره بین آقایان عارف دهقاندار پژوهشگر امنیت بین الملل محمدحسن غلامی کارشناس مسائل خاورمیانه برای دیدن ویدیو در یوتیوب کلمه ( سیاسیون ) را سرچ بفرمایید یا بر روی لینک زیر کلیک کنید https://youtube.com/@PoliticalSt

👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @NAmericaSt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 May 2025, 22:40 UTCAnonymous Poll456 voters

به نظر شما، مهم‌ترین دلیل شکست مذاکرات ایران و آمریکا چیست؟

  1. بی‌اعتمادی متقابل28%
  2. دخالت کشورهای دیگر13%
  3. فشار داخلی در ایران19%
  4. زیاده‌خواهی آمریکا40%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 September 2024 to 7 June 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 992,223 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“سیاسیون_مطالعات قاره آمریکا” (@NAmericaSt), 1,381 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NAmericaSt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.