3 measurements spanning 16 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 854–860 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
30 Aug 2026, 22:34
859
+2
15 Aug 2026, 19:05
857
+2
14 Aug 2026, 10:46
855
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 17 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
12 reactions across 6 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
11
91.7%
😁
1
8.33%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 January 2026 to 25 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🏦IBPS RRB Scale–II IT Officer Interview Guidance & Mock Interviews💯
After the excellent results in IBPS SO IT Officer Interview and NABARD IT Officer Mains batch (based on student reviews), we are launching a focused interview guidance program for IBPS RRB Scale–II IT Officer.
🔹 You will get 2 One-to-One Mock Interviews:
1️⃣ Core IT Interview
By Shubhi Ma’am
(Ex-IT Officer, Union Bank of India | AIR 12 – IBPS SO IT)
…
Kolkata panel 3
What is looker
Diff b/w cloud computing and web hosting
Types of joins
Difference b/w stored procedure and trigger
Types of back ups in database
Layerwise all the device names in all the layers
What is encryption
Difference b/w symmetric key encryption and asymmetric key encryption
There are four types of work in rrb it officer, in which of these field you can contribute and why?
Location - Kolkata
Date - 21-11-24
1- started from where I'm from
2- current employer and role
3- then all questions regarding my testing based questions
4- black box white box
5 - unit testing, Integration testing
And all discussions regarding my role and all
RRB Scale 2 IT Officer Interview Experiences
Transcript 1
Some of the questions are below:
1. Why banking after IT?
2. How you will use your qualification in banking?
3. What is blockchain and in what part of banking you can implement it?
4. What is LAN? Factor affecting network speed?
5. What is RRB? And why it has been introduced?
6. What is chatbot?
7. What is IoT and its application?
8. What is network topology…
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Shubhi Choubey
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @NABARD_IT_Officer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 15 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
What is the primary advantage of bitmap indexes over B-tree indexes?
📌 Topic: DBMS - Indexing
A) Better for updates15%
B) Faster for joins19%
C) Efficient for low-cardinality59%
D) Less storage space7%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 January 2026 to 25 January 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Oliveboard Official @OliveboardApp · 75,340 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 August 2026
Sheetal Sharma Ma'am Official @sheetalsharma01 · 116,829 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 14 August 2026
Study Quick by Varun Chitra @StudyQuick by Varun Chitra @englishbyvarunchitra · 55,128 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 24 August 2026
Target RBI Grade B 2027 @TargetRBI2018 · 41,040 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 29 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“IBPS RRB Scale 2 IT Officer By Shubhi Mam(IBPS SO IT AIR12)” (@NABARD_IT_Officer), 859 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NABARD_IT_Officer.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
