Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for N9 備用頻道

Channel

N9 備用頻道

@N9girls

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

5,532subscribers

-48 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002264140580
TypeChannel
Username@N9girls
Created18 December 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/N9girls

Growth

5,5285,5805,5547 August 2026 — 5,580 subscribers8 August 2026 — 5,578 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,575 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,570 subscribers17 August 2026 — 5,567 subscribers19 August 2026 — 5,566 subscribers23 August 2026 — 5,554 subscribers27 August 2026 — 5,543 subscribers29 August 2026 — 5,536 subscribers1 September 2026 — 5,528 subscribers5 September 2026 — 5,532 subscribers5,5327 August 20265 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 29 days, net -48. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,520–5,588 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 06:385,532+4
1 Sept 2026, 15:125,528-8
29 Aug 2026, 23:055,536-7
27 Aug 2026, 04:055,543-11
23 Aug 2026, 23:145,554-12
19 Aug 2026, 23:155,566-1
17 Aug 2026, 09:555,567-3
13 Aug 2026, 07:255,570-5
10 Aug 2026, 17:025,575-3
8 Aug 2026, 02:015,578-2
7 Aug 2026, 15:465,580first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 18 December 2024the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

19 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
19100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 18 December 2024 to 10 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Apr 2026, 15:56 UTC≈4,050 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @callginhkg

HG🔡🔡谷3.0 歡迎對HG有興趣嘅巴打們加入‼️‼️ https://t.me/+KlF2Qyib4Gg1NTU1

4

5 Apr 2026, 02:47 UTC≈7,480 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026

哥哥們 ,添加備用頻 https://t.me/n9hg20261

10 Mar 2026, 02:03 UTC≈9,710 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026

哥哥們 ,添加備用頻 https://t.me/n9hg20261

28 Feb 2026, 02:03 UTC≈11,200 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

此頻道已停止更新,將保留為備用頻道。 請盡快加入新主頻🙏 https://t.me/n9hg20261

3

6 Feb 2026, 02:19 UTC≈12,500 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

此頻道已停止更新,將保留為備用頻道。 請盡快加入新主頻🙏 https://t.me/n9hg2026

5

12 Jun 2025, 14:20 UTC≈57,800 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

預約Telegram客服: @enjoy13292 whatsapp預約:https://wa.me/85259118131

7

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @N9girls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“N9 備用頻道” (@N9girls), 5,532 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/N9girls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.