2 measurements taken within a single day, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,462–4,470 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 20:03
4,463
-6
12 Aug 2026, 01:30
4,469
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 21 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.89%
avg views ÷ 4,463 subscribers
Avg views / post
441
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.453%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
19 (21 February 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
1,324
Reactions total
6
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 01:30 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
62 reactions across 15 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
36
58.1%
🤣
10
16.1%
👍
8
12.9%
🔥
6
9.68%
👏
2
3.23%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 62reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 21 February 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🇺🇸 🇮🇱 The U.S. and Israel Are Discussing a Land Blockade of Iran
What Does This Mean for Traders?
Washington and Jerusalem are considering the possibility of cutting off Iran’s land trade routes. Trump and Netanyahu also discussed maintaining the blockade and the possibility of launching large-scale strikes.
The Strait of Hormuz is virtually paralyzed. Tensions remain high.
This is the moment when you can predict …
New platform launched ⚡️⚡️
ByTrading is on top 🥴
The more users, the more rewards.
Heavy heavy rewards 🎭🎭
REWARDS 👇👇
1- motercycle ✅
2- iphone 17 pro max ⚡️
3- cash rewards 🤑
🫨🫨🫨🫨🫨🫨🫨
More invites more benifits 🙃
Joining link 👇
https://bytrading.fun/?code=E5FB24
Free signals 😵💫👇👇
https://t.me/BYTrading_AI_SignalGroup
This is big opportunity to start work now
Any problems dm me 🙃
@Ellaben888
The 5-minute s…
🟢If you only have 100USDT in your Binance account, I can show you the way to earn 4000USDT. 100% legal - Join here, hurry 👇
https://t.me/+oJJx6YWeEbAwZWFi
Need only 50 members 😎
Mise à jour du Grass Airdrop
➡️ Mise à jour de la tokenomique
30% de l'offre totale sera allouée à la communauté
• Plus de clarté attendue le 7 juillet.
Grass a été tout récemment listé sur OKX .
Plusieurs Poste sur X(twitter) montre que la distribution de la saison 2 aura lieu le 29 April 🗓️.
Cette information n'est pas officiellement confirmé par l'équipe 🔒. Resté a l'écoute
🚀 Jump in before it blows up
Right now, people are quietly collecting 🪙 NEX coins just by joining early.
💰 Invite friends = 10,000 NEX per referral (worth up to $1,000 💸)
🪙 More coins when you invite friends
🌐 Extra rewards inside the community
🔥 It’s already growing… are you in yet?
👉 Join https://m.novaexai.com/register?inviteCode=uMXcf8
💬 Community access:
https://t.me/NovaEx_Ai
⚡️ Don’t be late to something …
🚨DERNIÈRE NOUVELLE : 🇺🇸 Trump a déclaré que l'Iran a accepté de ne plus jamais fermer le détroit d'Ormuz.
"Il ne sera plus utilisé comme une arme contre le monde."
👍5
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @N21PRO. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
DjetKar 🫥 @djetkarprochannel · 628,163 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 12 August 2026
FIFA MONEY PRONO 🏆 @FIFAMONEYPRON · 242,127 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 12 August 2026
King Fury Pro 💯 @KingFuryPronos · 138,783 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 13 August 2026
CryptoFam_fr @cryptofam_fr · 223,415 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 August 2026
🫥🕵🏾 ROSWELL STRAT GROUP🫵🏿🫵🏽 @RoswellStratGroup · 179,016 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 12 August 2026
NIMPAZOR PRONO @nimpazorprono · 152,532 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“N21 PRO” (@N21PRO), 4,463 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/N21PRO.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.