Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

xN1ceAttack - Stream

@N1ceAttackTV

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,352subscribers

+77 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002232209675
TypeChannel
Username@N1ceAttackTV
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/N1ceAttackTV

Growth

1,2751,3521,313.57 August 2026 — 1,275 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,276 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,276 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,342 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,352 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net +77. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,263–1,364 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 11:481,352+10
10 Aug 2026, 19:131,342+66
7 Aug 2026, 22:471,276no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:211,276+1
7 Aug 2026, 17:261,275first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.9%
avg views ÷ 1,352 subscribers
Avg views / post
458
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.798%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (7 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total5,501
Reactions total13
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 22:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

13 reactions across 3 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍430.8%
🔥430.8%
❤‍🔥215.4%
17.69%
😭17.69%
🤡17.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC230 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ну что го попробуем дать по пятакам засосникам которых 120? 60 против 120 Го https://kick.com/xn1ceattack

5 Aug 2026, 17:39 UTC271 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Всем привет) Вроде пофиксил все траблы с интернетом , покачались немного и го на поток посмотрим файты на босах, крутанем кодики https://kick.com/xn1ceattack

1 Aug 2026, 03:59 UTC614 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⭐️⭐️⭐️ ТРИ БОГАТЫРЯ ЗАВОЗЯТ⭐️⭐️⭐️ Дамы и господа, в честь открытия нового, летнего сервера FRESH X3, я со своими колегами-мутантами, решили запустить приятный розыгрыш для наших подписчиков. Мы очень вас ценим, стараемся радовать вас контентом и конечно же хорошими призами. 😅 Именно по этому, дорогие обитатели Valhalla-Age, зрители, друзья, выполняйте условия, жмите кнопку "Я В ДЕЛЕ!" и забирайте реальную адену 💰 +

👍4🔥4❤‍🔥2

30 Jul 2026, 23:30 UTC394 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

И так ... Завтра основной канал выйдет с бана , доп канал тоже в бане( Так что завтра будет стрим заточки и Первый Олимп на х3 Розыграем кодики ( так сказать помощь малюткам) Ждем вторую часть патч ноута , возможно будет небольшой баланс) А в целом сегодня нормально так пофлексили на эпиках. Всех обнял , за самый клоунский комментарий под этим постом выдам кодик завтра)

1🤡1

28 Jul 2026, 18:08 UTC486 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Драка с жестким засосом фул сервер против 1 клана Го https://kick.com/pro100n1ce

27 Jul 2026, 17:58 UTC464 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Мальчишки и девченки, основной канал в бане , по этому пробуем так на доп канале https://kick.com/pro100n1ce Го посмотрим новые внешки и файты на босиках !

24 Jul 2026, 18:33 UTC753 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Уебали , но мы идем в наступление на Инову !!! Запустил https://www.twitch.tv/xniceattack

24 Jul 2026, 16:35 UTC471 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Мужики, запустил старт топового летнего проекта от Валхалла !!!! х3 https://kick.com/xn1ceattack го го го

24 Jul 2026, 16:00 UTC308 viewsread 7 August 2026

🎉 Результаты розыгрыша: 🏆 Победители: 1. Кирилл Paff (@KirillPaff) 2. Антон (@Anton_Garmotko) 3. Евгений Р 🤦‍♂️ 4. KS (@L2_KS_Essenc) 5. Nikita (@Niksonzz) 6. Иван (@vanovano6) 7. Ivan (@Ivan3ycb) 8. Елена (@mtselena) 9. Дмитрий (@arch1teck) 10. Eugeniy (@tihonenko_de) ✔️Проверить результаты

24 Jul 2026, 10:10 UTC309 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

☄️☄️Грандиозное событие☄️☄️ 🔥 Настало время начать новую историю, собрать сильную команду и побороться за место среди лучших. ⚔️ Что вас ждет: • Захватывающий старт сервера • Жаркие PvP с первых минут (кто не видел подкаст КЛов -www.youtube.com/watch?v=eSCtmQLckTg с канала Валхала медия) • Эпичные битвы за споты и боссов • Активное комьюнити и море эмоций ⏰ Старт: Сегодня, 20:00 (GMT+3) 📦Сылка для старых и новых ак

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @N1ceAttackTV. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,011,935 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“xN1ceAttack - Stream” (@N1ceAttackTV), 1,352 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/N1ceAttackTV.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.