فتوشاپ جدید با ابزارهای هوش مصنوعی، نورپردازی و سبک تصاویر را تغییر میدهد ابزار و فناوری·۲۱ آبان ۱۴۰۵·0 ادوبی در رویداد Adobe MAX 2026 در میامی بیچ، مجموعهای از قابلیتهای تازه را برای نرمافزارهای Photoshop و Lightroom معرفی کرد. بخش مهمی از این بهروزرسانیها بر استفاده از هوش مصنوعی برای افزایش کنترل کاربران بر نورپردازی، سبک بصری، ترکیببندی و اصلاح جزئیات تصاویر تمرکز دارد. از تغییر موقعیت و رنگ منابع نور در …

Channel
Roozrang | روزرنگ
@Myroozrang
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,667subscribers
+9 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001003286443 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Myroozrang |
| Description | مجله آنلاین هنر و دیزاین ارتباط با ادمین: @RoozrangAdmin www.roozrang.ir Email: [email protected] Instagram: roozrang |
| Created | Between 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Myroozrang |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 18:29 | 9,667 | +5 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 00:19 | 9,662 | -6 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 17:04 | 9,668 | +6 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 21:56 | 9,662 | -4 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 20:59 | 9,666 | -2 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 14:20 | 9,668 | -4 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 15:57 | 9,672 | +3 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 05:17 | 9,669 | +5 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 19:39 | 9,664 | -2 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 08:40 | 9,666 | -8 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 17:20 | 9,674 | -5 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 16:01 | 9,679 | +12 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 10:38 | 9,667 | -1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 12:41 | 9,668 | -4 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:12 | 9,672 | -3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:43 | 9,675 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:56 | 9,678 | +3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:02 | 9,675 | +5 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:13 | 9,670 | -3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 10:08 | 9,673 | first reading |
Engagement
93 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 9.59%
- avg views ÷ 9,667 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 927
- 34 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.628%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 34
- of 93 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 30 of 34 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 93 (27 July 2026 – 12 November 2026) |
| Views total | 31,531 |
| Reactions total | 183 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 11:27 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈5,740
- Videos
- ≈169
- Links
- ≈3,970
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 3m 25s
- Average length
- 1m 43s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
629 reactions across 81 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 344 | 54.7% | |
| 👍 | 192 | 30.5% | |
| 👎 | 50 | 7.95% | |
| 💔 | 26 | 4.13% | |
| 😁 | 14 | 2.23% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 0.477% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 87 of the 93 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 655 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 93 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 34 posts held from the last 30 days (8.82%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
۶ پروژه آزمایشی ادوبی در Adobe MAX ۲۰۲۶ که آینده طراحی و تولید محتوا را تغییر میدهند ابزار و فناوری·۲۱ آبان ۱۴۰۵·0 ادوبی در رویداد Adobe MAX ۲۰۲۶ در میامی، مجموعهای از پروژههای آزمایشی خود را با عنوان Adobe Sneaks معرفی کرد؛ پروژههایی که تصویری از مسیر آینده نرمافزارهای خلاقانه این شرکت ارائه میدهند. این بخش از رویداد سالانه ادوبی همواره یکی از جذابترین قسمتهاست؛ چراکه در آن فناوریها و ایدههایی به نمایش در…
❤2👍2
لایکا شصتمین سالگرد لنزهای افسانهای خود را جشن میگیرد عکاسی·۲۱ آبان ۱۴۰۵·0 شرکت لایکا (Leica) به مناسبت شصتمین سالگرد معرفی خانواده لنزهای افسانهای Noctilux، کتابی نفیس و ۲۴۰ صفحهای منتشر میکند که تاریخچه، دستاوردهای اپتیکی و روند تکامل این لنزها را در طول شش دهه روایت میکند. لایکا در معرفی این کتاب میگوید: «از نخستین لنز تولید انبوه این شرکت با سطوح آسفریکال گرفته تا جدیدترین مدل واید، این کتاب داستان چگونگی…
کنفرانس Adobe MAX آغاز شد؛ شروع عصر دستیارهای هوشمند در نرمافزارهای طراحی ابزار و فناوری·۲۰ آبان ۱۴۰۵·0  ادوبی در رویداد Adobe MAX ۲۰۲۶ از یکی از مهمترین تحولات اکوسیستم Creative Cloud پرده برداشت. پلتفرم Firefly که پیشتر بیشتر بهعنوان ابزاری برای تولید تصویر با هوش مصنوعی شناخته میشد، حالا در حال تبدیل شدن به یک استودیوی جامع تولید محتوای خلاقانه است؛ محیطی که ابزارهای اختصاصی ادوبی، مدلهای هوش مصنوعی شرکتها…
👍3
فراخوان جایزه بینالمللی Better Design Award ۲۰۲۶ فراخوان·۲۰ آبان ۱۴۰۵·0 جایزه Better Design Award ۲۰۲۶ با دعوت از طراحان، شرکتها، دانشگاهها و گروههای پژوهشی سراسر جهان آغاز شده است. این رقابت که در چین برگزار میشود، بر طراحی محصول، توسعه راهکارهای صنعتی و ایدههایی تمرکز دارد که بتوانند از مرحله طراحی به تولید و کاربرد واقعی برسند. مهلت ثبتنام و ارسال آثار تا ۱۲ دسامبر ۲۰۲۶ (۲۱ آذر ۱۴۰۵) اعلام شده و شرکت در آن…
👍1
توافق دیزنی و ادوبی برای هوش مصنوعی؛ چه چیزی نگرانیها را برانگیخته است؟ هوش مصنوعی·۱۹ آبان ۱۴۰۵·0 همزمان با آغاز رویداد Adobe MAX ۲۰۲۶ در میامی، شرکت ادوبی از همکاری تازهای خبر داده که میتواند جایگاه این شرکت را در صنعت هوش مصنوعی تغییر دهد. ادوبی، سازنده نرمافزارهای شناختهشدهای مانند فتوشاپ و ایلاستریتور، اکنون بهعنوان «شریک رسمی نوآوری در حوزه هوش مصنوعی» شرکت والت دیزنی انتخاب شده است. بر اساس این توافق، …
💔2❤1👎1
فراخوان طراحی پوستر پلکتیوات ۱۹؛ دعوت به بازاندیشی در مفهوم اجتماع فراخوان·۱۹ آبان ۱۴۰۵·0 فراخوان طراحی پوستر پلکتیوات ۱۹ (Plaktivat ۱۹)با موضوع «اجتماعها» (Community(ies)) منتشر شد. این رقابت بینالمللی از طراحان گرافیک و هنرمندان سراسر جهان دعوت میکند تا با طراحی یک پوستر شهری، درباره شکلگیری ارتباط انسانی، حس تعلق و نقش تعاملهای روزمره در ساختن جامعهای پیوندخوردهتر ایدهپردازی کنند. مهلت ارسال آثار تا ۲۷ نو…
❤2
بزرگترین کتابخانه مدلها و متریالهای سهبعدی جهان برای همیشه رایگان شد ابزار و فناوری·۱۷ آبان ۱۴۰۵·0 اپیک گیمز بار دیگر مجموعه عظیم Quixel Megascans را رایگان کرده است؛ اما این بار ظاهراً خبری از دسترسی موقت نیست و هنرمندان سهبعدی میتوانند بهصورت نامحدود از این کتابخانه استفاده کنند. این مجموعه که یکی از بزرگترین آرشیوهای داراییهای سهبعدی اسکنشده در جهان به شمار میرود، دو سال پیش و همزمان با راهاندازی فر…
👍7
ژیلت یک تیغه اصلاح را در حروف لوگوی خود پنهان کرده است لوگو و نشانه·۱۶ آبان ۱۴۰۵·0  لوگوی برند ژیلت (Gillette) در نگاه اول چیزی جز نامی آشنا با حروفی ساده و خوانا نیست؛ اما اگر کمی دقیقتر به آن نگاه کنید، جزئیاتی ظریف توجهتان را جلب میکند: تصویری پنهان از یک تیغ اصلاح که در دل حروف لوگوشکل گرفته است. این جزئیات که ژیلت اخیراً بار دیگر در صفحه اینستاگرام خود به آن اشاره کرده، در فاصله میان دو حرف G و i دیده میشود.…
👍11❤1
Cinema ۴D و ZBrush به قابلیت لمسی در مکبوک پرو جدید مجهز میشوند ابزار و فناوری·۱۶ آبان ۱۴۰۵·0 شرکت مکسون (Maxon) قصد دارد با پشتیبانی از نمایشگر لمسی مکبوک پرو جدید اپل، شیوه تعامل هنرمندان و طراحان با نرمافزارهای سهبعدی را تغییر دهد. بر اساس اعلام این شرکت، نرمافزارهای Cinema 4D و ZBrush در اواخر نوامبر ۲۰۲۶ به قابلیتهای لمسی مجهز میشوند؛ امکانی که کنترل مستقیم مدلها و ابزارهای سهبعدی را برای کاربران فرا…
بازگشت والاس و گرومیت با یک ماجرای زمستانی تازه انیمیشن·۱۵ آبان ۱۴۰۵·0 استودیو انیمیشنسازی آردمن (Aardman) در همکاری تازهای با برند بریتانیایی باربور (Barbour)، فیلم تبلیغاتی کریسمس ۲۰۲۶ خود را با حضور شخصیتهای محبوب «والاس و گرومیت» منتشر میکند. این همکاری که پس از استقبال گسترده از فیلم سال گذشته شکل گرفته، بار دیگر دنیای دوستداشتنی این دو شخصیت را با حالوهوای زمستانی و سنتهای کریسمس پیوند میدهد. فیلم امسا…
❤8
تعدیل گسترده نیرو در کانوا نشانهای هشداردهنده برای فناوریهای خلاق است خبر روز·۱۴ آبان ۱۴۰۵·0 هنرمندان و فعالان حوزه خلاقیت با نگرانی از گسترش هوش مصنوعی آشنا هستند. تصویرگران و طراحان گرافیک با نارضایتی شاهد بودهاند که شمار بیشتری از کسبوکارها به این نتیجه میرسند که تصاویر و طرحهای بیکیفیت تولیدشده با هوش مصنوعی، برای نیازهای تبلیغاتی و هویت بصری آنها کافی است. بسیاری از طراحان نیز شرکتهایی مانند کانوا و اد…
❤4😢1
Showing the 12 most recent of 93 posts we hold for @Myroozrang. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
به نظرتان بازطراحی لوگوتایپ اینستاگرام موفق بوده؟
- 👍 بله، مدرنتر شده57%
- 👎 نه، قبلی بهتر بود46%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 93 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@AR_NOSRATI · 48,803
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
@festivart · 23,176
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 19 September 2026
@herfeh_honarmand · 21,940
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 September 2026
@ArtApply · 23,019
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 18 September 2026
@Pariz_Group · 65,937
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 20 August 2026
@honaragah · 25,046
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 September 2026
@graphicu · 45,538
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 26 August 2026
@havin_hosseiny · 50,714
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 24 August 2026
@poyotacademy · 27,078
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 September 2026
@Musicenovin · 25,958
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 6 September 2026
@khattmedia · 21,315
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 24 September 2026
@uigraphic · 33,865
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 3 September 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Roozrang | روزرنگ” (@Myroozrang), 9,667 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Myroozrang.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.