Channel

Mycorrhiza Breakfast by Constantin Kichinsky

@MycorrhizaBreakfast

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

78subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1001959515663
Type	Channel
Username	@MycorrhizaBreakfast
Description	О теории и практике социо-технологических экосистем. Основной сайт - https://mb.spectralthinking.org/
Created	28 April 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded	9 August 2026
Last confirmed live	9 August 2026
Measurements held	2
On Telegram	t.me/MycorrhizaBreakfast

Growth

2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 77–79 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
9 Aug 2026, 19:47	78	no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:48	78	first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 28 April 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Links: 6

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

28 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction	Count	Share
👍	8	28.6%
🤔	8	28.6%
❤	7	25.0%
🔥	5	17.9%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 28 April 2023 to 14 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Mar 2025, 08:03 UTC254 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Глава 5. Базовая схема СТЭ О том, как составить простейшую (графовую) схему участников экосистемы, обозначив ядерных игроков, ключевые роли и отношения между ними. Ключевые моменты: — В первом приближении СТЭ удобно изображать как граф отношений, собираемый вокруг одно или нескольких ядер — ключевых игроков, порождающих соответствующую систему ценностей и отношений. — Границу экосистемы удобно представлять, исходя и…

🤔1

Signed Constantin Kichinsky

13 Mar 2025, 11:06 UTC199 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Глава 4. Проверка «экосистемности» определением О том, как использовать определение СТЭ для базовой проверки, является ли предполагаемый феномен социо-технологической экосистемой или нет. Ключевые моменты: — Определение СТЭ, как и любое определение, должно помогать проверять явления на соответствие. Если в предъявляемом явлении мы не находим существенных черт, то, скорее всего, мы имеем дело с другим феноменом. — Уд…

🤔2

Signed Constantin Kichinsky

26 Feb 2025, 08:02 UTC164 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Глава 3. Определение социо-технологической экосистемы О том, как задать рабочее определение для (социо-)технологической экосистемы по аналогии с биологической, чтобы не расплескать по пути ценность заимствования понятия. Ключевые моменты: — Определение социо-технологической экосистемы как некоторого конструкта, связанного с обществом и технологиями, удобно и логично формулировать по аналогии с определением биологиче…

👍2❤1🤔1

Signed Constantin Kichinsky

18 Feb 2025, 08:03 UTC156 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Глава 2. Карго-культ экосистем О попытках разных компаний (в России) более или менее авторитетно повесить на себя ярлык экосистемы, не разобравшись, что это означает. При том, что как потребители мира технологий мы на подкорке чувствуем, что нас разводят. :) Ключевые моменты: — С конца 2010х в России, усилиями западных консалтинговых компаний и некоторых локальных агентов, сформировался миф о «цифровых экосистемах».…

👍2🤔1

Signed Constantin Kichinsky

17 Feb 2025, 09:33 UTC159 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Глава 1. Игра в слова О том, что слово «экосистема» в технологическом мире является заимствованием, и в подобных метафорических переносах полезно поиграть в слова — посмотреть, как при переносе ведут себя синонимы и другие близкие понятия. Ключевые моменты: — Язык подсказывает правильность использования термина при переносе метафоры. Это можно проверить поиском замены на синоним из изначальной области использования…

👍3🤔2

Signed Constantin Kichinsky

12 Feb 2025, 09:37 UTC≈1,220 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Всем привет! Давно ничего не писал, я с новостями. 1. Пересобрал (как минимум в голове) весь проект по изучению и описанию технологических экосистем. Это по-прежнему work-in-progress, но уже на новых рельсах — организационно и местами методологически. 2. Запустил сайт "Завтрак микорризы", на котором открыто (по крайней мере пока, ахаха) будут выкладываться материалы. Преимущественно последовательно, но там план на …

❤6🔥5👍1🤔1

Signed Constantin Kichinsky

28 Apr 2023, 14:43 UTCviews —

Channel created

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @MycorrhizaBreakfast. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 998,123 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Куда рынки идут
@snknrvs · 3531 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mycorrhiza Breakfast by Constantin Kichinsky” (@MycorrhizaBreakfast), 78 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MycorrhizaBreakfast.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.