Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

MYCloud Partners

@MycloudPartners

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

997subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002206456261
TypeChannel
Username@MycloudPartners
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/MycloudPartners

Growth

9976 Aug 2026, 23:32 — 997 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 09:18 — 997 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 23:327 Aug 2026, 09:18
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 996–998 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 09:18997no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:32997first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.5%
avg views ÷ 997 subscribers
Avg views / post
264
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.639%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (3 August 20266 August 2026)
Views total5,281
Reactions total21
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 23:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

21 reactions across 10 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1781.0%
👍29.52%
🔥29.52%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 14:13 UTC160 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

오늘 하이닉스 하락 사유 분석글 https://m.blog.naver.com/sandsandglass/224370306316?createTime=1786014366000

👍2

6 Aug 2026, 12:19 UTC494 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

내 이랄줄 알았다 메기 하나 풀어서 가격 좀 후려쳐 볼까 하다가 잘못하면 구매 자체가 안될 수도 있겄다ㅋ https://n.news.naver.com/article/008/0005396761

1

6 Aug 2026, 09:50 UTC918 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

상황이 얼마나 좋으면 이 보수적인 업체가 증설을...

🔥2

6 Aug 2026, 09:50 UTC168 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @darthacking

2026.08.06 16:27:24 기업명: 고영(시가총액: 2조 1,177억) A098460 보고서명: 신규시설투자등(자율공시) *투자구분 및 목적 - 시설증설(여주 생산센터 증설) - - AIDC·반도체 고객사 수요 확대 대응을 위한 산업용 검사장비 생산능력 확충- 의료로봇사업의 글로벌 확산 대응을 위한 생산 기반 확충 투자금액 : 294억 자본대비 : 8.8% 투자시작 : 2026-08-06 투자종료 : 2027-08-31 투자기간 : 1.1년 공시링크: https://dart.fss.or.kr/dsaf001/main.do?rcpNo=20260806900463 회사정보: https://finance.naver.com/item/main.nhn?code=098460

6 Aug 2026, 00:07 UTC238 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @WalterBloomberg

U.S. REMOVES IRAN-RELATED SANCTIONS -TREASURY WEBSITE (@WalterBloomberg)

5 Aug 2026, 07:09 UTC138 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @darthacking

2026.08.05 15:54:56 기업명: 심텍(시가총액: 3조 8,588억) A222800 보고서명: 연결재무제표기준영업실적등에대한전망(공정공시) *2026년 (단위 : 억원) 시작일 : 2026-07-01 종료일 : 2026-12-31(6개월) 매출액 : 10,719억 영업익 : 1,631억 순이익 : 공시링크: https://dart.fss.or.kr/dsaf001/main.do?rcpNo=20260805900462 회사정보: https://finance.naver.com/item/main.nhn?code=222800

5 Aug 2026, 07:09 UTC85 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @darthacking

2026.08.05 15:54:19 기업명: 심텍(시가총액: 3조 8,588억) A222800 보고서명: 연결재무제표기준영업(잠정)실적(공정공시) 매출액 : 5,146억(예상치 : 4,626억+/ 11%) 영업익 : 629억(예상치 : 468억/ +34%) 순이익 : 448억(예상치 : 277억+/ 62%) **최근 실적 추이** 2026.2Q 5,146억/ 629억/ 448억 2026.1Q 4,224억/ 137억/ 144억 2025.4Q 3,934억/ 103억/ -1,168억 2025.3Q 3,728억/ 124억/ 67억 2025.2Q 3,408억/ 55억/ -187억 공시링크: https://dart.fss.or.kr/dsaf001/main.do?rcpNo=20260805900457 회사정보: https://finance.naver.

5 Aug 2026, 02:06 UTC188 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @marketfeed

*U.S., IRAN, OMAN NEAR 60-DAY INTERIM DEAL TO REOPEN STRAIT OF HORMUZ *PROPOSED AGREEMENT SETS INBOUND TRAFFIC IN IRANIAN WATERS, OUTBOUND IN OMANI WATERS *HORMUZ DEAL EXCLUDES TOLLS OR TRANSIT FEES DURING INITIAL 60-DAY PERIOD *PARTIES AGREE TO CLEAR NAVAL MINES FROM HORMUZ MEDIAN LANE WITHIN 30 DAYS ...

5 Aug 2026, 00:21 UTC231 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

바이오에 또 다른 악재인지 오해에 따른 기회인지 정확하진 않지만 대장급에서 나온 변동성을 이용할 필요는 있을듯

2

5 Aug 2026, 00:21 UTC75 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @dndpharmatech

안녕하십니까 디앤디파마텍입니다. 한국시간 어제 저녁 시간에 공개된 당사의 비만 파이프라인 파트너사인 P사의 개발 품목 현황 중 당사 제품 중 하나가 개발중단으로 언급되어 있기에 이에 대한 설명을 드리고자 합니다. 결론부터 말씀드리면, MET-224o의 개발 중단은 경쟁력 높은 제품으로의 전략 변화이지 당사 제품의 기술(오랄링크)의 문제는 아닌 것으로 판단됩니다. 기술적 문제에 따른 중단이었다면, 개발이 중단된 제품에 적용된 기술(오랄링크)을 기반으로 한 후속제품을 개발하지는 않을 것입니다. 이어진 인터뷰에서 P사는 펩타이드 기반의 경구용 GLP-1제품의 개발을 지속하겠다고 밝힌 점을 고려하면, 당사는 기반기술인 오랄링크 플랫폼 및 P사와의 파트너쉽에는 문제가 없다고 판단하고 있습니다. 2023년에서 2024년에 걸쳐 당사와 총 6개 품

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MycloudPartners. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 822,083 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MYCloud Partners” (@MycloudPartners), 997 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MycloudPartners.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.