https://www.youtube.com/shorts/xc1abiBJnEo
🔥1
Channel
@MusingMindDegen
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,587subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003988612878 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MusingMindDegen |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 22 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MusingMindDegen |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:24 | 1,587 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:18 | 1,586 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:33 | 1,586 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (22 July 2026 – 2 August 2026) |
| Views total | 21,441 |
| Reactions total | 92 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 21:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
92 reactions across 16 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 57 | 62.0% | |
| ❤ | 30 | 32.6% | |
| 🤡 | 3 | 3.26% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 2.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 92reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/xc1abiBJnEo
🔥1
You mailed into my company a postcard a few weeks back requesting information on penny stocks that had huge upside potential with very little downside risk. Something just came across my desk, John. The name of the company, Aerotyne International. It is a cutting-edge high-tech firm out of the Midwest awaiting imminent patent approval on huge military and civilian applications. Now, right now, John, the stock trades …
🔥2❤1
Highest i have hit so far was 600k, 450k ish RAW like 2.5-3.5x lol My lowest was below 10k RAW lmaoo This is too much fun. Wats your highest so far?
Also the win on packs are randomized. you can hit 85 sol TRIPLET pack which gives you instant 45x or you can hit very common packs where you lose 40-50% in sol but can redeem for RAW and wait for price to pump. Its gambling on steroids lol coz you speculate on token price and you get bust on packs or get lucky lol
Only 135 Holders rn. so we might be early here. Again i would recommend using a BURNER wallet not main wallet coz thats the security hygiene i always follow on new stuff.
Aped $RAW $750k Its similar to FWA on RH which went $40M and currently at 20M. I like it better than FWA coz FWA has Random NFT's from a pool and RIP has Random memecoins like (BONK, WIF, ANSEM, TRIPLET, etc.) USE A BURNER WALLET COZ YOU DIRECTLY INTERACT ON THE WEBSITE AND ITS NEW ONE (RISKY) DONT USE THE BOTS. Can only buy on their website How to buy? Go to the website https://rip.win Connect a BURNER WALLET B…
🔥6❤1
Not good for our bags. was up 2-3x, now down bad coz of this tweet https://x.com/samconnerone/status/2081302993962455539
❤2
Why i choose to bid on $Architects on Arc chain? On Arc Chain (Circle’s Layer-1 blockchain built for stablecoin finance which has raised $222 Million around 3 Billion valuation), “Architects” refers to participants in the Architects program- Arc’s official community ambassador/contributor program. Its all over their Official website, Docs, Tweets. https://community.arc.io/public/resources/architects-overview https…
🔥5❤2
Some info on how it works eUSD is a 1:1 derivative, well how it works is. they lock your USDC on Base in a contract and issue eUSD on Arc chain so you can trade any tokens freely. Once the Arc bridge opens they'll bridge those USDC(Base) and migrate eUSD pairs to USDC pairs. So yeah we are trusting Envolpe until mainnet bridge officially opens but the derivates and the tokens like Architects we are buying are issu…
🔥3
Its going. Looks like a no brainer
🔥5
Bought $ARCHITECTS On Arc chain( Its Circle's chain) at $300k Mcap https://gmgn.ai/arc/token/0xc6d6f1fc29acd081e94909ea60e2307339e551e0 Can Bridge USDC (base) to Arc chain eUSD here (USE A BURNER WALLET) https://envelope.trade/?tab=bridge Lore https://x.com/arc/status/2013703075710836942
🔥4❤2
Two CEX listings for $FEFER: MEXC and LBank. Personally, I find it interesting that this kinda stuff is happening on day 2 of fefer. Stable chain’s main page is supporting FEFER as the main memecoin and they’ve posted about GMGN. They clearly want an on-chain season and want volume flowing to their chain. These exchange listings don’t look like a coincidence to me especially when a coin is sub 10m. Give it time…
🔥5❤4🤡3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MusingMindDegen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 358,580 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Musing mind Degen” (@MusingMindDegen), 1,587 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MusingMindDegen.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.