Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Муркина тетрадь. Блог художника и фотографа.

Channel

Муркина тетрадь. Блог художника и фотографа.

@Murochka_book

2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,552subscribers

+36 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001837529641
TypeChannel
Usernames@art_milica_bellic @Murochka_book
DescriptionАксинья Квасова. https://vk.ru/murochka_book Создаю контент для брендов. Тут обо всём, что меня вдохновляет. Живу на Байкале. Для связи и рекламы @Milica_bellic Каталог изделий из кожи тут https://vk.ru/craft_people Себя не находят, себя создают ♥️.
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 September 2026
Measurements held15
On Telegramt.me/Murochka_book

Topic

Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,5161,5521,5346 August 2026 — 1,516 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,518 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,517 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,520 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,524 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,525 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,529 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,531 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,534 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,535 subscribers7 September 2026 — 1,538 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,543 subscribers15 September 2026 — 1,546 subscribers25 September 2026 — 1,550 subscribers28 September 2026 — 1,552 subscribers6 August 202628 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 52 days, net +36. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,511–1,557 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Sept 2026, 05:221,552+2
25 Sept 2026, 03:201,550+4
15 Sept 2026, 16:391,546+3
11 Sept 2026, 22:171,543+5
7 Sept 2026, 09:201,538+3
2 Sept 2026, 22:551,535+1
30 Aug 2026, 23:571,534+3
27 Aug 2026, 15:131,531+2
24 Aug 2026, 17:131,529+4
20 Aug 2026, 17:351,525+1
17 Aug 2026, 19:241,524+4
14 Aug 2026, 16:071,520+3
10 Aug 2026, 20:441,517-1
7 Aug 2026, 17:191,518+2
6 Aug 2026, 17:461,516first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.0%
avg views ÷ 1,552 subscribers
Avg views / post
233
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
18.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held9 (27 July 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total1,165
Reactions total216
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Sept 2026, 05:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈4,480
Videos
≈110
Links
≈149

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
22s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

388 reactions across 9 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤13434.5%
🔥12231.4%
🥰5614.4%
❤‍🔥4812.4%
👏143.61%
👍123.09%
🎃10.258%
🦄10.258%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 388 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Sept 2026, 18:42 UTC162 views32 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

Ох эти осенние штучки и мои ящички с карандашами так и манит их фоткать вместе 🙈.

🔥25👏5❤2

26 Sept 2026, 09:25 UTC181 views39 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Forwarded from @nabroskiartPhoto

Aksinia Kvasova #работы_подписчиков

🥰20❤13🔥5👍1

25 Sept 2026, 04:23 UTC242 views52 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

Готов первый разворот по референсам конкурса #осень_artdiary . Что я могу сказать. Льняной скетчбук ждал почти 2 года свой час. Я привыкла к бумаге. И она чудесная. Вывозит буквально всё. Миллионы слоёв цветных карандашей, акварельную или пастельную подложку, протиры и электроластик и всё это без повреждений. Очень советую несмотря на то, что поверхность бумаги твердая на первый взгляд, вы не пожалеете. Ну а я…

❤‍🔥36🥰10👍3🔥2🎃1

24 Sept 2026, 06:57 UTC251 views40 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

Решила что осенние рефы очень подходят скетчбукам от Артдайри. Пройти мимо конкурса сложно. Поэтому вот. #осень_artdiary

❤32❤‍🔥6👍2

22 Sept 2026, 05:13 UTC329 views53 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

Красивый пейзаж на пробниках из коробочки со скетчбуками 💔

🔥37👏9❤7

4 Aug 2026, 13:08 UTC239 views49 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Нерпа Байкальская 💙 Сухая пастель и цветные карандаши.

🔥31🥰9❤8👍1

29 Jul 2026, 16:17 UTC443 views62 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Явная, демонстрация скотча. Кажется надо уже просить гонорары за рекламу. Опережая вопросы, беру постоянно в строительном магазине, розовый для деликатных поверхностей. Нерпёшка в скетчбуке Молескин ❤️

❤43🥰14👍5

27 Jul 2026, 17:01 UTC447 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Нерпяшное великолепие в нашем с дочей исполнении. Стараемся придумывать для Вас что-нибудь новенькое, стильное и яркое. Хотя этот обвес на любой сезон будет стильно смотреться. Больше обвесов тут ✔️

❤25🔥6🥰3

27 Jul 2026, 12:38 UTC344 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Фото сегодняшнего дня не менее классные. Я наконец-то благодаря гостям вдоволь насмотрелась на кукол семьи Намдаковых. Рассматривая каждую деталь. Они прекрасны. И в жизни намного больше, чем я себе представляла. Потом потусовались у нас в мастерской , поели буузы и мороженое. Сделали фото на память. Буду скучать ❤️.

🔥16❤‍🔥6❤4🦄1

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @Murochka_book. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Красный Карандаш
@krasniy_karandash · 28,220
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 9 September 2026
наброски и скетчбуки
@nabroskiart · 28,937
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 9 September 2026
Школа Рисования Всем Арт
@vsemartschool · 20,291
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 28 September 2026
Мария Нарушевская | Скетчинг с нуля ✏️🍏
@daily_sketch_by_maria · 24,465
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 16 September 2026
KalachevaSchool
@kalachevaSchool · 21,981
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 September 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Муркина тетрадь. Блог художника и фотографа.” (@Murochka_book), 1,552 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Murochka_book.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.