5 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC≈715 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
"Аллоҳ таоло золимни яхши кўрганидан мартабасини юқори қилмайди, балки кўтариб-кўтариб, кейин ерга уриш учун шундай қилади". Шайх Торифий ҳафизаҳуллоҳ https://t.me/MunadiyTv
Channel
“MunadiyTv”
@MunadiyTv
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,182subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001377936151 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MunadiyTv |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MunadiyTv |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:58 | 1,182 | +1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:29 | 1,181 | +3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:31 | 1,178 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:30 | 1,180 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:50 | 1,177 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:48 | 1,177 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 4 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 82.2%
- avg views ÷ 1,182 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 972
- 12 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.447%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 12
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (4 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 11,665 |
| Reactions total | 46 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 08:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
4 Aug 2026, 10:47 UTC≈526 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo
Ижтимоий тармоқ: фойда ва зарарлар #⃣ Ижтимоий тармоқнинг ижобий томонларидан бири олди-сотди ва тижорат ишлардаги қулайликлардир. Аксар одамлар халта кўтариб дўконга ё бозорга бориш машаққатидан қутулдилар, бунга эҳтиёж қолмади. Айниқса, уй бекалари кўчага чиқмаёқ ижтимоий тармоқ орқали рўзғорларига керак махсулотларга буюртма бериш имкони пайдо бўлди. Тижоратчилар интернет орқали савдо-сотиқларини амалга оширадига…
3 Aug 2026, 06:57 UTC≈839 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo
Ижтимоий тармоқ: фойда ва зарарлар #⃣ Ижтимоий тармоқнинг ижобий томонларидан даъват қилишдаги қулайлиги. Қуръон ё ҳадис ўргатмоқчи бўлсангиз ҳам, силсилавий дарс қиласизми, бирон китобни ўқиб, интернетга аудио шаклини жойлайсизми, саволларга жавоб йўллайсизми, фатво бериш буларнинг барини ўтирган жойингизда бир тугмани босиш билан бутун дунёга тарқатиш имкони айнан шу ижтимоий тармоқ чиққач юзага келди. Бошқа юртда…
30 Jul 2026, 12:46 UTC≈1,110 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Мусулмон одам намозни тарк қилиши асло мумкин эмас. Ҳатто касал бўлса ҳам қолдирмай ўқиши шарт. Шу даражадаки, тик туриб ўқишга қодир бўлмаса, ўтириб ўқийди. Ўтириб ўқишга ҳам қодир бўлмаса, ёнбошлаган ҳолда ўқийди. Агар ёнбошлаб ўқишга ҳам қодир бўлмаса, чалқанча ётиб ўқийди. Модомики ақл-хуши жойида экан намоз соқит бўлмайди. Бошқа фарз амаллар қодир бўлсагина фарз бўлади. Масалан: закот бойларга фарз, пули нисобга…
29 Jul 2026, 08:54 UTC≈909 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo
Ижтимоий тармоқ: фойда ва зарарлар #⃣ Ижтимоий тармоқнинг ижобий жиҳатидан яна бири: илмий ишлардаги қулайчилиги. Илгари бирон масала ҳақида мақола ё фатво тайёрлаш учун китоблар сотиб олиш, кутубхоналарга бориш ва ҳоказо ўзига яраша машаққат чекиларди. Шахсий кутубхона қилмоқчи бўлса, яхшигина маблағ керак бўларди. Ҳозир эса минглаб китоблар шу қўлимиздаги телефон ё компютерда жойлаштирилган, кичкина шу жиҳозимиз т…
28 Jul 2026, 14:09 UTC≈874 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo
Ижтимоий тармоқ: фойда ва зарарлар #⃣ Юқорида айтганимиздек, ижтимоий тармоқнинг ижобий ва салбий жиҳатлари бор, шуларни бирма-бир санаб ўтамиз. Ижтимоий тармоқнинг ижобий томонини айтадиган бўлсак: энг аввало оила аъзолари, қавм-қариндошлар ва умуман одамлар орасидаги алоқа воситаси экани, ижтимоий тармоқнинг ижобий томонидир. Илгари одамлар бир ерда яшашар эди. Чет элларга сафар қилиш оммавий тус олмаган, ака-укал…
27 Jul 2026, 08:03 UTC≈1,030 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo
Ижтимоий тармоқ: фойда ва зарарлар #⃣ Тўғри, ўрнида ижтимоий тармоқ муҳим ва фойдали эканида шубҳа йўқ. Оқил одам буни ўз ўрнига қўя билади, керагидан ортиқ баҳо бермайди, ёмонлик, фасод, фаҳш ва бузуқликка ишлатмайди. Энг муҳими шунга мубтало бўлмайди, яқинларидан устун қўймайди, ҳаётининг мазмуни қилиб олмайди, эҳтиёжига қараб фойдаланади, холос. Давоми бор 💬 ✉️ “MunadiyTv” sahifasi ⭕️⭕️⭕️⭕…
26 Jul 2026, 13:58 UTC≈1,300 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
“Qalb fohisha bo‘lsa, badanning bokiraligi foydasiz” https://youtu.be/Y-saN93XCwc?si=f4uxTO2QmUW2kglO
26 Jul 2026, 09:50 UTC≈397 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo
Ижтимоий тармоқ: фойда ва зарарлар #⃣ Ижтимоий тармоқда тарқаган видеода кўрган бўлсангиз, бир она ёш боласининг қўлидан телефон ё планшетни олиб қўйганига, уйдаги ҳамма нарсани синдириб ташлабди, етти ё саккиз ёш бола. Шу даражага келишига ўзимиз ҳам сабабчимиз, бола жим ўтирсин деб қўлига телефон бериб қўямиз, балоғатга етган ўғлимиз, бўйи етган қизимизга ўртоқларидан кам бўлмасин деб, яхши телефон олиб берамиз, н…
21 Jul 2026, 13:20 UTC≈1,590 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Йигирма биринчи асрга келиб ичкиликка наркоманлик ҳам қўшилди. Бир маҳалладан наркоманлик балосига мубтало бўлган ўттиздан зиёд, асосан 18-35 ёш атрофидаги йигитлар ўлиб кетганига, айримларининг оиласидагилар безор бўлганидан ўз қўллари билан жиннихоналарга ва диспансерларга топшириб юборганига гувоҳ бўлдик. Бир оилада битта наркоман чиқса, шу оилага ташвиш ўлароқ етар экан. Ота-она бечора ҳамма нарсасини сотиб, бола…
20 Jul 2026, 08:23 UTC≈1,680 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo
Ижтимоий тармоқ: фойда ва зарарлар #⃣ Айримлар ижтимоий тармоққа банги бўлиб қолган. Шу даражадаки, бир хотин устидан эри шикоят қилиб келибди: “Тақсир, хотиним менга яхши қарамайди, мен билан иши ҳам йўқ. Қўлидан телефон тушмайди, унга ижтимоий тармоқ бўлса бўлди. Инстаграммга кириб кетса, кетди шу билан, мен келдимми, кетдимми парво ҳам қилмайди, маслаҳат берсангиз”, дебди. Домла: “Хотинингни олиб кел ва менинг ол…
19 Jul 2026, 14:13 UTC≈695 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo
Ижтимоий тармоқ: фойда ва зарарлар #⃣ Юқорида айтганимиздек ижтимоий тармоқнинг ўзига яраша ижобий ва салбий жиҳатлари бор. Биз бу суҳбатимизда унинг ҳам ижобий, ҳам салбий томонлари ҳақида сўз юритамиз. Кейин у ёғини ўзинигиз ҳал қилаверасиз, чунки ҳар бир инсон ўзини ўзи яхши билади. Бу ижтимоий тармоқлардан кўпроқ фойда оляптими ё зарар кўряптими ҳар бир одам ўзи яхши билади. Кимлар учун бунинг фойдасидан зарари …
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MunadiyTv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 201,657 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Qur'on Akademiyasi
@QuronAkademiyasi · 33211 postsHadiyabox 🎁🎁🎁
@hadiya_box24 · 1242 posts📚 ISLOM_YO‘LI 📚
@IslomYoli_Kanali · 1,2392 postsArab tilim
@Arabtiliim · 1361 postOila masalalari
@Oila_masalalari_rasmiy · 1261 postFOYDALI KANALLAR LINK
@Sahih_Muslim_Kanallar · 21 postXidoyat izlab
@Xidoyat_izlab1 · 351 post
@QuronAkademiyasi · 33211 postsHadiyabox 🎁🎁🎁
@hadiya_box24 · 1242 posts📚 ISLOM_YO‘LI 📚
@IslomYoli_Kanali · 1,2392 postsArab tilim
@Arabtiliim · 1361 postOila masalalari
@Oila_masalalari_rasmiy · 1261 postFOYDALI KANALLAR LINK
@Sahih_Muslim_Kanallar · 21 postXidoyat izlab
@Xidoyat_izlab1 · 351 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
““MunadiyTv”” (@MunadiyTv), 1,182 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MunadiyTv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.