Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 49 days, net -3,161. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,168–20,277 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 07:38
16,642
-427
18 Sept 2026, 19:20
17,069
-164
16 Sept 2026, 09:37
17,233
-82
14 Sept 2026, 14:18
17,315
-91
13 Sept 2026, 01:59
17,406
-120
11 Sept 2026, 04:40
17,526
-161
8 Sept 2026, 07:40
17,687
-254
5 Sept 2026, 00:18
17,941
-68
3 Sept 2026, 10:22
18,009
-79
2 Sept 2026, 01:56
18,088
-77
1 Sept 2026, 02:27
18,165
-101
30 Aug 2026, 23:07
18,266
-26
30 Aug 2026, 02:15
18,292
-67
29 Aug 2026, 02:09
18,359
-49
28 Aug 2026, 01:08
18,408
-13
27 Aug 2026, 01:36
18,421
-57
25 Aug 2026, 22:43
18,478
-84
24 Aug 2026, 22:35
18,562
-83
23 Aug 2026, 12:08
18,645
-107
21 Aug 2026, 19:16
18,752
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 27 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
18s
Average length
9s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
155 reactions across 20 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
37
23.9%
👍
24
15.5%
👏
19
12.3%
🤔
11
7.10%
🔥
9
5.81%
🥰
9
5.81%
⚡
7
4.52%
❤🔥
6
3.87%
✍
4
2.58%
👨💻
4
2.58%
🤓
4
2.58%
🤯
4
2.58%
💊
3
1.94%
😎
3
1.94%
😱
3
1.94%
🤣
3
1.94%
😐
2
1.29%
🍌
1
0.645%
👀
1
0.645%
🤨
1
0.645%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 155 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 August 2025 to 6 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚨 URGENT SECURITY NOTICE 🚨
Dear community,
We’ve been made aware of a fake account impersonating our team member under the name “Abraham MateoMus | CTO” with the handle @AMateoMusik.
⚠️ This person is NOT part of our official team, and the website “.pro” they promote is a scam site.
Please do NOT click, connect your wallet, or share any personal information on that website.
✔️ Our official website: https://www.mu…
🔈 Multiple Network – Reminder for $MTP Holders
‼️ If you have added liquidity to any old $MTP token pools on-chain, please withdraw your liquidity as soon as possible. The old token is no longer supported and any funds left in these pools may be at risk.
🔴 We strongly encourage all users to take action promptly to ensure the safety of your assets.
New $MTP Token Contract (BSC): 0x83330d159C9A4B09E6717feeFef7a634b7…
🔈 𝐌𝐮𝐥𝐭𝐢𝐩𝐥𝐞 𝐍𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤 – 𝐌𝐓𝐏 𝐓𝐨𝐤𝐞𝐧 𝐒𝐰𝐚𝐩 𝐀𝐩𝐩𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐅𝐨𝐫𝐦
If you are an on-chain $MTP holder and did not receive your new $MTP tokens following the recent token replacement, please fill out the form to request your 1:1 token swap.
🔗 𝐒𝐮𝐛𝐦𝐢𝐭 𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞: forms.gle/LfptBX7VszJ8f1DdA
✔️ Instructions: Only users who held the original MTP tokens and missed the automatic airdrop should submit.
Thank you for your patience and suppor…
🔈 𝐌𝐮𝐥𝐭𝐢𝐩𝐥𝐞 𝐍𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤 — 𝐎𝐟𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐓𝐨𝐤𝐞𝐧 𝐒𝐰𝐚𝐩 & 𝐁𝐮𝐲𝐛𝐚𝐜𝐤 𝐏𝐥𝐚𝐧 𝐟𝐨𝐫 $𝐌𝐓𝐏
The original $MTP token was compromised after a third-party market maker unlocked and dumped tokens, polluting the supply.
To protect the community and ensure stability, the team will implement a full token replacement with a systematic buyback.🚨
🔷 Sept 29, 2AM UTC – Exchanges will suspend $MTP deposits/withdrawals/trading & take a snapshot
🔷 New $M…
🔈 Multiple Network – Community Update
Dear $MTP holders,
🔵 Judicial Investigation
We will publish the latest progress of the judicial investigation within one week.
🔵 On-Chain Trading Advisory
As some of the on-chain $MTP supply may have been polluted, we advise users who need to trade $MTP tokens to trade within exchanges for safety.
🔵 Buyback Plan
A detailed buyback plan will be released in the coming days. Thi…
🔔 Update
Here’s the new page for MultiPass Authorization Cards (NFTs) Staking: 👇https://multipass.multiplenetwork.org
⚠️ Note: The original website is currently unavailable.
— Multiple Network
🔈 Multiple Network Official Announcement
⚠️ Our original official website http://multiple.cc is currently under attack and temporarily unavailable.
✔️✔️ We have launched a temporary official website: http://multiplenetwork.org to ensure uninterrupted access to project information and updates.
We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience caused. 🙏Thank you for your understanding and continued support.
— Multiple N…
📌 Announcement
MTP Liquidity Pool Update
✔️ We have officially removed the MTP/BNB liquidity pool and migrated it to the MTP/USDT pool.
This adjustment aims to enhance market depth and stability, ensuring a smoother trading experience.
#MultipleNetwork $MTP #LP #Announcements #BNB #Binance
✳️ Every new listing deserves more than just a start.
Something big is loading for $MTP
🎁 Epic campaign is right around the corner.
Stay tuned!
$MTP #MultipleNetwork #TradeFi #AI #MATFRP
❤🔥4❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MultipleNetworkNewsChannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@MultipleNetworkNewsChannel named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@amateomusik named in 5 posts, 8 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
@tradetideai_ named in 5 posts, 8 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
HSE Update @lokerhseupdate · 24,244 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 16 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Multiple Network News Channel” (@MultipleNetworkNewsChannel), 16,642 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MultipleNetworkNewsChannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.