4 measurements spanning 8 days, net -71. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,237–6,330 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
28 Aug 2026, 20:24
6,248
-28
25 Aug 2026, 12:03
6,276
-28
22 Aug 2026, 07:36
6,304
-15
21 Aug 2026, 02:15
6,319
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 31 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1h 43m
Average length
20m 45s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
658 reactions across 17 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
268
40.7%
❤
105
16.0%
👍
90
13.7%
😁
79
12.0%
🥰
41
6.23%
👏
29
4.41%
🆒
13
1.98%
🤩
13
1.98%
🐳
10
1.52%
🤔
4
0.608%
🍓
3
0.456%
🕊
2
0.304%
🙏
1
0.152%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 658reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 31 January 2025 to 23 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 17 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Multilevel01C1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 January 2025 to 23 November 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🎤 IELTS (Multi level) Speaking Part 2 Sample Answer
Describe a film or cartoon you recently watched.
You should say:
what it was
when you watched it
and explain why you liked it .
I’d like to talk about an animated film I watched recently called “Soul.” It’s a thought-provoking and beautifully animated movie produced by Pixar. I saw it a couple of weeks ago when I had some free time, and it really
left a deep impre…
Telefonga qaramlikni kamaytirish uchun Start Up jamoasidan samarali yechim !
Videoni telefonga mukkasidan ketib qolganlarga yuborib qoʻyamiz 😁
Keyingi videolarda qanday mavzularni yortishimizni xoxlaysiz?
Izohlarda yozib qoldiring 🔽🔽🔽
StartUp jamoasidan ilk Multi level natijalar🥳
Siz ham shunday ajoyib natijaga erishmoqchi bo'lsangiz StartUp o'quv markazi eng yaxshi tanlov
Bizda barcha darajalar uchun qabul ochiq
Murojaat uchun telefon raqam⬇️⬇️
+998947360303
📍Bizning manzil: Mingbuloq tumani avtovokzal yonidagi Rayhon oshxonasining 2-qavatida
🔽 Ijtimoiy tarmoqlarimiz🔽
😁STARTUP 📱 STARTUP
StartUp jamoasidan ilk Multi level natijalar🥳
Siz ham shunday ajoyib natijaga erishmoqchi bo'lsangiz StartUp o'quv markazi eng yaxshi tanlov
Bizda barcha darajalar uchun qabul ochiq
Murojaat uchun telefon raqam⬇️⬇️
+998947360303
📍Bizning manzil: Mingbuloq tumani avtovokzal yonidagi Rayhon oshxonasining 2-qavatida
🔽 Ijtimoiy tarmoqlarimiz🔽
😁STARTUP 📱 STARTUP
📢⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️
Assalomu alaykum barchaga !
Yangi haftadan(14-iyul) markazimiz o’z faoliyatini boshlashi munosabati bilan bizda mavjud oʻquv kurslari haqida qisqacha malumot bermoqchimiz :
🇬🇧Ingliz tili
📈Beginner to advanced
🌐IELTS
🇺🇿Multi level (CEFR)
👨🏫 APTIS
🇰🇷 Koreys tili
🇷🇺 Rus tili
➕ Matematika
Jamoamiz a’zolari haqida qisqacha ma’lumot :
Umarjon Sobirov
Shahzodbek Tursunboyev
Ahadjon Karimov
Shohjahon Ma’rufjon…
Ohirgi paytlar online hayotta kamnamoman . Kuchli ustozlar jamoasi bilan yangi oʻquv markazga asos solyapmiz . Katta kuch katta mas’uliyat bilan sifatli , negizi pul bo’lmagan ,tizimli ta’lim joriy etishga bor kuchimiz bilan harakat qilyapmiz . Oʻquv markazimiz ham online ham offline faoliyat olib boradi !
O’quv markazimiz rasmiy kanaliga obuna boling . Tez orada katta yangiliklar boladi !
Telegram : StartUp school
Tong shunchalik barokatliki xattoki telefon ham tez zaryad olarkan . Ertalab soat 6 yarimda zaryadka qoygandim 100 bo’pti 😅
Bekorga aytishmaganda erta turgan kishini Hudo berar ishini ,
Erta turmagan keshini urin sindir tishini deb
Hazil albatta
Bugungi kun barchaga barokatli boʻlsin !
Topic: Some people think that competition at work at school and daily life is an good thing . Others believe that we should try to cooperate more rather than competing each other .
Introduction
There is a growing debate about whether individuals should prioritize cooperation or competition in their daily lives. While competition may drive personal and professional achievements, I firmly believe that cooperation is …
🔥20😁4❤3👍2🤩2👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Multilevel01C1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
TRUE or FALSE ?
BYD offers much cheaper option with almost the same features as Tesla .
True62%
Flase38%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 31 January 2025 to 23 November 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Khan Global Studies (notes) @kgs_notes · 67,150 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Expert Teacher Sobirov” (@Multilevel01C1), 6,248 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Multilevel01C1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
