7 measurements spanning 17 days, net +1,118. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,210–2,665 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Aug 2026, 16:08
2,497
+1,046
21 Aug 2026, 00:34
1,451
+1
18 Aug 2026, 03:52
1,450
+20
14 Aug 2026, 21:23
1,430
+52
11 Aug 2026, 03:31
1,378
-1
7 Aug 2026, 22:18
1,379
no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:23
1,379
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
27.1%
avg views ÷ 2,497 subscribers
Avg views / post
678
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
20 (14 July 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
5,423
Reactions total
63
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 22:18 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
207 reactions across 19 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
90
43.5%
💯
43
20.8%
custom 5900144235490844600
25
12.1%
⚡
14
6.76%
custom 5431628883352895287
13
6.28%
🤯
8
3.86%
👍
6
2.90%
❤🔥
3
1.45%
🤔
3
1.45%
👀
2
0.966%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 207reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
دوافع ومحرّكات التجسس 📝
🔢الدافع العقدي
أن يعمل الشخص لصالح جهة أخرى انتصاراً لمعتقد ديني أو مذهبي أو فكري معين يراه حقاً .
🔢الدافع الأيديولوجي
أن يدفع الشخص إيمانه بنظام سياسي أو فكري معين إلى تقديم الولاء له على ولائه لأمّته أو لدولته ، فيرى أن مصلحة الفكرة تعلو على مصلحة الأمّة.
🔢دافع الانتقام والثأر
أن يسعى الشخص للانتقام من مؤسسته أو دولته بسبب شعوره بالظلم، أو الإقصاء، أو الإهانة، فيستخدم المعلومات كسلاح للت…
ما أهمية دقة الرمي 🔻
🔢قول النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم "3 مرات ألا إن القوة الرمي .
🔢الأجر العظيم في قتل الكافR «لا يجتمع كافر وقاتله في النار أبدا» .
🔢كسب الثقة بالنفس لمتابعة القتال بعزم .
🔢تحطيم معنويات العدو يؤدي إلى ربح نصف المعركة على الأقل .
🔢التقدم السريع في المعركة وكسب الوقت .
🔢تساعد في تجنب الأخطاء في الأماكن التي يختلط فيها الصديق والعدو .
🔢لها دور كبير في إنجاز الإغارة وحرب المباني والمدن والكمائن .
…
الأماكن التي يحذر منها 🇵🇸
1⃣. المطارات
صالات الانتظار، كراسي الشحن، الحمامات، طاولات الكافيهات داخل المطار.
2⃣. المقاهي والمطاعم
3⃣. الفنادق
في الغرف، في قاعات الاجتماعات والمؤتمرات، الهدف غالباً رجال الأعمال والسياسة.
4⃣. قاعات المؤتمرات والمعارض
يوزعوها كـ "هدايا مجانية" مع شعار شركة وهمي، أو يتركوها على الكراسي بعد المحاضرات.
5⃣. الجامعات والمكتبات
في قاعات الدراسة،وفي الطاولات.
6⃣. الم…
# كابل O.MG - عندما يتحول كابل الشحن العادي إلى سلاح سيبراني واختراق وتجسس 🔌⚠️
هل تتخيل أن الكابل الذي بيدك الآن قد يكون... ليس عادياً كما يبدو؟
👀 القصة وراءه
صممه باحث أمني يُعرف بلقب MG، وعرضه لأول مرة في مؤتمر DEF CON الشهير، فأحدث ضجة كبيرة في عالم الأمن السيبراني. الفكرة كانت بسيطة وصادمة: كابل شحن عادي تمامًا من الخارج، لكنه يخفي بداخله منصة تجسس واختراق كاملة تحاكي أداة كانت تبيعها وكالة الأمن القومي الأمريك…
👈من يحمل هذه الأمانة؟
⏹التدريب لا يُقاس بعدد الساعات،
بل بجودة من يُدرّب .
⏹هذا المدرّب الذي ترمقه عينك قادر أن يبني جيشاً قائماً على العقيدة، أم أنّه لا يبني إلا وهماً يسقط عند أول صدمة ؟!
﴿وأعدوا لهم ما استطعتم من قوة ومن رباط الخيل ترهبون به عدوّ الله وعدوكم﴾📌
"إعداد القوة" يكون بضوابط شرعية ووفق منهج الله لا وفق آراء الجنرالات ولا أصحاب الرّتب حتى القوة تُقاس بميزان العدل ورفع الظلم وحماية المستضعفين .
🔻 معسكرات تقوم وفق منهج شرعي:
الانضباط يبدأ من الداخل، صلاة في وقتها، الصدق، الأمانة، تعظيم أمر الله وأمر رسوله فوق كل شيء، المدرب قدوة قبل أن يكون آمر.
🔻 معسكرات بلا منهج شرعي:
الانضباط فيها شكلي و…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Mujahid39. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
عملية تكتيكية لتأمين منطقة ما بالقضاء على جيوب العدو ونزع ألغامه 🎯؟!
تفجير 💥23%
تمركز 💚3%
تطهير 💚45%
تسلل💚28%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 609,592 of 1,604,161entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“عقيدة المحارب” (@Mujahid39), 2,497 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Mujahid39.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.