5 measurements spanning 14 days, net -20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,939–2,965 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
3 Sept 2026, 09:18
2,942
-5
30 Aug 2026, 21:28
2,947
-4
24 Aug 2026, 18:23
2,951
-11
21 Aug 2026, 02:03
2,962
no change
20 Aug 2026, 15:15
2,962
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.9%
avg views ÷ 2,942 subscribers
Avg views / post
349
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026
Posts held
16 (8 August 2026 – 20 August 2026)
Views total
4,190
Reactions total
338
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
20 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 05s
Average length
31s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
431 reactions across 16 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
177
41.1%
🔥
100
23.2%
🙏
39
9.05%
🍓
34
7.89%
😁
18
4.18%
👏
16
3.71%
🥰
10
2.32%
🤝
8
1.86%
🤩
8
1.86%
🤪
6
1.39%
🤣
5
1.16%
🤬
5
1.16%
👍
3
0.696%
custom 5380038633841504975
1
0.232%
🕊
1
0.232%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 431 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Друзья, сегодня стартуют закрытые продажи Менторства «Работа с группой» по спец ценам.
Те, кто был в списке ожидания, жду вас сегодня в 17.00 в zoom. Ссылки в боте и на почте.
Для тех, кто желал, но проглядел лист ожидания, оставляю здесь ссылку до эфира😉👇🏻
https://kuznetsovaanna.online/mentorstvo_predzapis
P.s.: видео смотреть со звуком, вы поймете😄🤟🏻
Сделали сегодня песню! Записали за 2 часа💪🏼это достаточно быстро. Прошлую я писала 4🙈
Теперь ждать, когда выйдет релиз. Я хочу, чтобы вы, когда будете её слушать - соединялись со своей силой🥊🔥💃🏽она о том, как защищать себя😈💪🏼😉
Вечер.. я в гостях у Нани Евы, а завтра я записываю в студии песню, которая выйдет в её альбоме марафона «Алые паруса» с командой единомышленников. Вот такая жизнь.
P.s.: И да, я хвастаюсь😄потому как важно замечать свои успехи и достижения и предъявить их💃🏽💫😈
Меня часто спрашивают коллеги и друзья, глядя на мой график и меня - КАК Я ВСЕ УСПЕВАЮ??
А я на минуту соло мама, с собакой и теперь ещё кошкой🤪🐈⬛
Для меня нет ничего сверхъестественного, а для людей со стороны оказывается есть. Я решила поделиться правилами, которых я придерживаюсь:
1. Правило 5 минут - если дело я могу сделать менее чем за 5 минут - я делаю его сразу. Прокрастинация штука опасная.
2. Я вношу в…
А расскажу я здесь! 👇🏻
Я собрала три важных темы в работе с группами и рассмотрим это в ближайшее время в вебинарах:
1. Как запускать динамику в группе? - 28.09
2. Риски в работе с группой - 14.09
3. Конфликты в группе и сложные клиенты - 7.10
Записаться👇🏻
https://kuznetsovaanna.online/vebinar_rabotasgruppoi
Сегодня в проекте Хэлп Пси2.0 я проведу вебинар о Работе с группой.. сейчас самое время учиться этому, если вы ещё не умеете. Как собирать, запускать и управлять динамикой группы, чтобы это было продуктивно для всех.
А самое главное, обсудим риски ведущего, потому как их вагон и маленькая тележка.
Сейчас групповой формат будет самым рабочим, востребованным и он во многих аспектах эффективнее личной терапии. Почему? …
РАСПИСАНИЕ АВГУСТ-ДЕКАБРЬ 💫
Дорогие, приглашаю вас исследовать себя: свои чувства, потребности, потенциалы и возможности ❤️
АВГУСТ
🗓️ 28.08 10:30 «Как запускать динамику в группе»
вебинар для психологов и коучей
🗓️ 28.08 вход в Супервизионный клуб | онлайн
Пространство для специалистов, которое посвящено психологической практике.
СЕНТЯБРЬ
🗓️ 14.09 18:00 «Риски в работе с группой»
вебинар для психологов и коуч…
Я так старалась для Супервизионного клуба, записывая видео контент три часа, что всё.. бэтери из лоу🤪
😁18❤12🔥7🤣5custom 53800386338415049751
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @Mrs_Anna_Kuznetsova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Денис Тясто | Остеопатия души @tiastodenis · 71,284 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 August 2026
Неудобный психолог @mamaterapia · 61,584 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 22 August 2026
Екатерина Прохорцева| психология роста сознания @kate_proh · 37,456 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 1 September 2026
Остеопатия души @osteopatiya_dushi · 45,412 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 August 2026
Психосоматика на пальцах🙌 @sanzharovvadym · 70,196 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 August 2026
ЮЛИЯ ХАДАРЦЕВА 🕊️ | Расстановки @JuliaKhadartseva · 38,228 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Анна Кузнецова | БУДЬ✨” (@Mrs_Anna_Kuznetsova), 2,942 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Mrs_Anna_Kuznetsova.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.