Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

MrVGunz

@MrVGunz

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

510subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001398519713
TypeChannel
Username@MrVGunz
Description🇮🇷 ﷽ Osint Tools News Exploit Database Bug Bounty Vulnerablity My team: @Team1979 Contact: @MrVGunz1979 [email protected] Twitter.com/MrVGunz Instagram.com/MrVGunz
CreatedBetween 1 October 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/MrVGunz

Growth

5107 Aug 2026, 12:24 — 510 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 04:05 — 510 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 12:248 Aug 2026, 04:05
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 509–511 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 04:05510no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:24510first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.65%
avg views ÷ 510 subscribers
Avg views / post
49.2
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.20%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026
Posts held20 (20 July 202624 July 2026)
Views total984
Reactions total29
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 04:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
878
Videos
53
Links
797

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

29 reactions across 13 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👾1758.6%
🤯827.6%
🤔413.8%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Jul 2026, 06:32 UTC60 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

O365 Toolkit is a professional desktop suite for Microsoft 365 account management and verification. It includes Email Validator, Email Sorter, SMTP Checker, Graph API, Inbox Manager, Email Sender, Email Generator, detailed logs, and a real-time dashboard in a modern interface. Built for fast processing, efficient workflow management, and maximum productivity. 📩 To purchase, contact: @MrVGunz1979 📢 Channel: @MrVGunz

👾3

21 Jul 2026, 08:14 UTC76 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚨 Can Your Laptop Camera Spy on You Without Warning? این یکی از سؤال‌های رایج امنیتی است؛ اما جوابش فقط «بله» یا «خیر» نیست. 🔍 در بیشتر لپ‌تاپ‌های جدید، چراغ وب‌کم به‌صورت سخت‌افزاری به دوربین متصل است؛ یعنی با فعال شدن دوربین، چراغ هم روشن می‌شود و جاسوسی مخفیانه سخت‌تر خواهد بود. ⚠️ اما خطر کاملاً از بین نمی‌رود: ✅ بدافزارها می‌توانند از مجوزهای دوربین سوءاستفاده کنند ✅ برنامه‌های ناشناس ممکن است دسترسی غیرضروری دا

👾3

21 Jul 2026, 07:59 UTC62 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚨 SonicWall VPN Devices Hit by Zero-Day Attacks دو آسیب‌پذیری Zero-Day در تجهیزات SonicWall SMA 1000 پیش از انتشار Patch، توسط مهاجمان برای نفوذ به دستگاه‌های VPN مورد سوءاستفاده قرار گرفته‌اند. 🔍 بررسی‌ها نشان می‌دهد مهاجمان پس از نفوذ، بدافزارهای سفارشی KNUCKLEBALL، Sou5 و ORANGETAIL را نصب کرده‌اند تا امکان اجرای دستورات، ایجاد دسترسی مخفی و نفوذ به شبکه‌های داخلی را به دست آورند. ⚠️ نکات مهم: ✅ هدف: تجهیزات VPN س

21 Jul 2026, 07:44 UTC48 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚨 Oracle E-Business Breach Exposes Enterprise Data شرکت Estée Lauder از یک نقض امنیتی خبر داده که در پی سوءاستفاده از یک آسیب‌پذیری بحرانی در Oracle E-Business Suite رخ داده است. 🔍 این نقص می‌تواند به مهاجمان اجازه دهد با اجرای کد از راه دور (RCE) به اطلاعات حساس سازمانی و داده‌های تراکنشی دسترسی پیدا کنند. ⚠️ نکات مهم: ✅ هدف: نسخه‌های قدیمی Oracle E-Business Suite ✅ خطر: اجرای کد و دسترسی غیرمجاز به داده‌ها ✅ علت: ض

21 Jul 2026, 07:29 UTC35 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚨 AI Agents Attack Hugging Face یک حمله جدید نشان می‌دهد تهدیدهای مبتنی بر Agentic AI دیگر فقط یک فرضیه نیستند و در دنیای واقعی در حال استفاده هستند. 🔍 یک عامل خودمختار AI با اجرای هزاران عملیات در محیط Sandbox توانست به بخشی از داده‌های داخلی و چند Credential سرویس‌های Hugging Face دسترسی پیدا کند. ⚠️ نکات مهم: ✅ اجرای خودکار زنجیره‌ای از عملیات نفوذ ✅ استفاده از AI به‌عنوان ابزار حمله ✅ دسترسی محدود به داده‌ها و اع

21 Jul 2026, 07:14 UTC34 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚨 WordPress Core Under Attack: Active SQL Injection Exploited یک آسیب‌پذیری بحرانی در هسته WordPress با شناسه CVE-2026-63030 به‌صورت فعال مورد سوءاستفاده قرار گرفته است. 🔍 این نقص از نوع SQL Injection بوده و از طریق REST API امکان اجرای دستورات مخرب بدون احراز هویت را فراهم می‌کند. مهاجمان می‌توانند با تزریق کد، وب‌شل ایجاد کرده و کنترل سایت را به دست بگیرند. ⚠️ پیامدهای احتمالی: ✅ ایجاد کاربر ادمین غیرمجاز ✅ آپلود و

🤯1

21 Jul 2026, 06:59 UTC31 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚨 HollowGraph Turns Microsoft Graph Into a Hidden C2 Channel یک بدافزار جدید با نام HollowGraph شناسایی شده که از سرویس Microsoft Graph به‌عنوان یک کانال مخفی Command & Control (C2) استفاده می‌کند؛ روشی که تشخیص ارتباطات مخرب را برای تیم‌های امنیتی دشوارتر می‌سازد. 🔍 مهاجمان با سوءاستفاده از زیرساخت‌های قانونی مایکروسافت، دستورات و داده‌ها را از طریق یک مسیر قابل اعتماد منتقل می‌کنند تا فعالیت‌های خود را در میان تراف

21 Jul 2026, 06:44 UTC36 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚨 Millions of WordPress Sites Under Attack Again هکرها در حال سوءاستفاده از چند آسیب‌پذیری تازه‌وصله‌شده در WordPress هستند؛ نقص‌هایی که می‌توانند میلیون‌ها وب‌سایت را در معرض نفوذ قرار دهند. 🔍 مهاجمان با بهره‌برداری از این آسیب‌پذیری‌ها، از طریق درخواست‌های دستکاری‌شده به بخش‌های آسیب‌پذیر، امکان اجرای کد از راه دور (RCE) و کنترل سرور را به دست می‌آورند. ⚠️ جزئیات مهم: ✅ هدف: نسخه‌های قدیمی WordPress ✅ نوع حمله: RCE

21 Jul 2026, 06:29 UTC35 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚨 9-Month Cyber Intrusion Hits South Korea’s Diplomatic Training Platform یک نقص امنیتی ناشناخته در سامانه آموزش دیپلماتیک کره جنوبی باعث شد مهاجمان برای حدود ۹ ماه به این پلتفرم دسترسی غیرمجاز داشته باشند. 🔍 مهاجمان با سوءاستفاده از یک Zero-Day و ضعف در پیکربندی‌های امنیتی، توانستند به اطلاعات کاربران دسترسی پیدا کنند. ⚠️ اطلاعات در معرض خطر: ✅ نام و شناسه کاربری ✅ ایمیل کاربران ✅ رمزهای عبور رمزنگاری‌شده ✅ اطلاعات

21 Jul 2026, 06:02 UTC46 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚨 Access Tor Hidden Services Without Tor Browser سرویس onion.run امکان دسترسی به وب‌سایت‌های .onion را از طریق مرورگرهای معمولی فراهم می‌کند و به‌عنوان یک Tor-to-Web Proxy عمل می‌کند. 🔍 ویژگی‌های این سرویس: ✅ دسترسی به سرویس‌های مخفی Tor بدون نصب Tor Browser ✅ سازگار با Chrome، Firefox، Safari و سایر مرورگرها ✅ بدون نیاز به نصب یا پیکربندی ✅ تنها با اضافه کردن پسوند .run به انتهای آدرس .onion 🛡 نکته امنیتی سرویس‌های

20 Jul 2026, 14:44 UTC50 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚨 Adobe Fixes Multiple Critical RCE Vulnerabilities شرکت Adobe مجموعه‌ای از اصلاحیه‌های امنیتی را برای ColdFusion و Campaign Classic منتشر کرده که چندین آسیب‌پذیری با شدت بالا، از جمله نقص‌های منجر به Remote Code Execution (RCE) را برطرف می‌کنند. 🔍 جزئیات مهم: ✅ چندین آسیب‌پذیری RCE در ColdFusion (نسخه‌های 2025.9، 2023.20 و قدیمی‌تر) ✅ امکان سوءاستفاده توسط مهاجم بدون نیاز به احراز هویت ✅ یک آسیب‌پذیری RCE در Campaig

👾2

20 Jul 2026, 14:29 UTC44 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚨 Linux Kernel 7.2-rc4 Released لینوس توروالدز چهارمین نسخه کاندیدای انتشار Linux Kernel 7.2-rc4 را منتشر کرد؛ نسخه‌ای که مجموعه‌ای از اصلاحات و بهبودهای مختلف را شامل می‌شود. 🔍 به گفته توروالدز، بخش قابل‌توجهی از باگ‌های این نسخه با کمک ابزارهای مبتنی بر هوش مصنوعی و مدل‌های زبانی بزرگ (LLM) شناسایی شده‌اند. ⚠️ مهم‌ترین تغییرات: ✅ رفع باگ‌های متعدد و بهبود پایداری هسته ✅ اصلاحات در بخش CAN/BCM ✅ گسترش تست‌های خودکار

🤯2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MrVGunz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 668,882 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MrVGunz” (@MrVGunz), 510 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MrVGunz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.