Channel
@MrCryptoOG_ETH
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
14subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002193723307 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MrCryptoOG_ETH |
| Description | "G Talk" Currently Public🔜 Private Channel. Owner: @MrCrypto_ETH |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 12 August 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MrCryptoOG_ETH |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:15 | 14 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:14 | 14 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
247 reactions across 6 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 142 | 57.5% | |
| 👍 | 47 | 19.0% | |
| 👌 | 22 | 8.91% | |
| 😱 | 17 | 6.88% | |
| 🐳 | 16 | 6.48% | |
| 🦄 | 3 | 1.21% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 247reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 August 2024 to 28 August 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
MrCrytoG.ETH pinned «Despite the market conditions being bad right now I’m still trying to find the best high quality plays that are profitable to us all Of course not all the calls I have called have been good but I try my best to keep providing calls that are good for my private…»
Despite the market conditions being bad right now I’m still trying to find the best high quality plays that are profitable to us all Of course not all the calls I have called have been good but I try my best to keep providing calls that are good for my private members and my community members here 🙏
👍30👌2
Signed Mike Sharaiha
🟨 Best performing tokens | Last 24H 🏆 📈 Average gain: 426% ⋅ Top 10: 13.53x 📊 Median: 213% 🥇 ⏐ BULLS @ 239.8K ➜ 13.9M Δ 58x ↳ [trx] ATH: 28.3M 🥶 🥈 ⏐ sicko @ 13.9K ➜ 715.7K Δ 29x ↳ [sol] ATH: 733.8K 🥉 ⏐ DP @ 49.1K ➜ 470.1K Δ 857% ↳ [sol] ATH: 1.2M 🥶 4️⃣ ⏐ Neko @ 55.0K ➜ 510.8K Δ 828% ↳ [trx] ATH: 571.0K - @Funwasp 5️⃣ ⏐ ZARGNATRON @ 15.9K ➜ 184.9K Δ 640% …
Signed Mike Sharaiha
Katchu Coin Buy! ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 🔀 Spent $101.48 (0.719 SOL) 🔀 Got 19,835 KATCHU 👤 Buyer / TX 🪙 Position +19% 🏷 Price $0.00511 💸 Market Cap $4,144,117 DexT | Screener | Buy | Trending
🔥29🐳4
Signed Mike Sharaiha
MrCrytoG.ETH pinned a photo
$KATCHU Been looking into this slow grind KATCHU because I was shilled by the whole community and its been doing well for the past months. Big volume coming in shows massive interest in the meme. As the project is pushing more content on X and working with AI, they're getting more attention into the token day by day! Putting a bet in this and targeting that 10mil ATH will happen very soon! DEX: https://dexscreene…
Signed Mike Sharaiha
20x on $BALLTZE 🔼 This is the play of the day happy printing chads hope you're scooping the dip 🤝
Signed Mike Sharaiha
2x on $BALLTZE ✅ This is looking good and nice ticker let’s see how far it goes 🔼 Don't forget to join @MrCryptoOG_ETH for the next alpha
🔥29
Signed Mike Sharaiha
MrCrytoG.ETH pinned «$BALLTZE Meme play. This shiba INU was an internet sensation together with DOGE, with both often side by side in memes and becoming enduring symbols of internet meme culture. Fresh launch, look for safe entry. Risky degen, DYOR. https://t.me/balltze_eth…»
$BALLTZE Meme play. This shiba INU was an internet sensation together with DOGE, with both often side by side in memes and becoming enduring symbols of internet meme culture. Fresh launch, look for safe entry. Risky degen, DYOR. https://t.me/balltze_eth https://x.com/balltze_eth https://balltze.vip 0x9999999840065a79d3a20575450eAa57b6a515FC
Signed Mike Sharaiha
Everyone get your sol ready to load your bag incoming banger
🔥21👌20👍16
Signed Mike Sharaiha
Have a blessed weekend 👋
Signed Mike Sharaiha
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MrCryptoOG_ETH. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@MrCryptoOG_ETH named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MrCrytoG.ETH” (@MrCryptoOG_ETH), 14 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MrCryptoOG_ETH.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.