Channel
@MpscEnglishKatta
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
40,558subscribers
-19 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001238506505 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MpscEnglishKatta |
| Description | This channel @MpscEnglishKatta is for MPSC preparation in English Help you to improve your vocabulary, understanding, grammar and develop your sense of English language.. Study material will be provided here for various competitive exams. |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MpscEnglishKatta |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:08 | 40,558 | -19 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 40,577 | first reading |
66 posts held, back to 12 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 66 (12 August 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 7,379 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 02:38 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
📔 Sample Copy ⚙️ ---------------------------------------------- 👩🍳अंगणवाडी मुख्यसेविका | पर्यवेक्षिका 🎓 प्रकाशक : विजयपथ पब्लिकेशन पुणे 💰 किंमत : ₹ 450/- --------------------------------------------- 🔵 जवळच्या बुक स्टॉलवर संपर्क करा 📞 अधिक माहितीसाठी 9075381000 --------------------------------------------
🚨 अंगणवाडी मुख्यसेविका | पर्यवेक्षिका तांत्रिक डायरी 🚨 ⭐️ TCS पॅटर्न नुसार मुख्यसेविका |पर्यवेक्षिका पदाच्या नवीन अभ्यासक्रमानुसार पुस्तकाची रचना ⭐️ मुख्यसेविका | पर्यवेक्षिका पदाशी संबंधित इतर परीक्षेत आलेल्या (MPSC, सरळसेवा, TCS) PYQ प्रश्नांचा समावेश ⭐️ FAST REVISION साठी TCS पॅटर्नचे PYQ + संभाव्य वानलाईनर व ऑब्जेक्टिव्ह प्रश्न ------------------------------------------- 📱 ऑनलाइन खरेदी लिंक https://bit.ly/3LJY…
When funds means money, it is used in the plural form.
Q : The organization is trying to raise __________ to support its projects.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
The expression ‘a group of us’ is followed by a plural verb.
Q : A group of us ___________ going to hold a party tomorrow.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
The expression ‘a group of us’ is followed by a plural verb.
Q : A group of us ___________ going to hold a party tomorrow.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
The expression ‘a number of people’ is usually followed by a plural verb.
Q : A number of people __________ tried to find the treasure.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Police is normally used as a plural noun.
Q : The police _______________ the thief.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 66 posts we hold for @MpscEnglishKatta. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 41 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Q : A group of us ___________ going to hold a party tomorrow.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Q : The organization is trying to raise __________ to support its projects.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Q : A number of people __________ tried to find the treasure.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Q : A group of us ___________ going to hold a party tomorrow.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Q : I will follow you wherever you___________?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Q : Both countries have withdrawn their __________.
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 66 most recent posts we hold, published 12 August 2026 to 14 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“इंग्रजी व्याकरण (official)™” (@MpscEnglishKatta), 40,558 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MpscEnglishKatta.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.