Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Movies Society🤩❤️

Channel

Movies Society🤩❤️

@Movies_Society

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

73,226subscribers

+7,683 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001444615101
TypeChannel
Username@Movies_Society
DescriptionTalks about movies Latest Everything you need to know about the movies industry☺️😌❤️
Created12 March 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held62
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Movies_Society

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

65,54373,22669,384.56 August 20269 November 2026
62 measurements spanning 94 days, net +7,683. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 64,391–74,378 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 00:1173,226+62
7 Nov 2026, 14:5173,164+68
6 Nov 2026, 13:4673,096+59
5 Nov 2026, 10:3673,037+20
4 Nov 2026, 11:5873,017+36
3 Nov 2026, 12:5672,981-15
2 Nov 2026, 14:2172,996+36
1 Nov 2026, 14:4072,960+29
31 Oct 2026, 17:0572,931-14
30 Oct 2026, 17:3672,945+99
29 Oct 2026, 15:5672,846+61
28 Oct 2026, 16:4972,785+75
27 Oct 2026, 18:1772,710+82
26 Oct 2026, 20:2772,628+81
25 Oct 2026, 18:5772,547+75
24 Oct 2026, 18:5772,472+39
23 Oct 2026, 18:2172,433+43
22 Oct 2026, 21:3772,390+55
21 Oct 2026, 14:5672,335+31
20 Oct 2026, 09:2072,304first reading

Engagement

86 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 194 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.1%
avg views ÷ 73,226 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,100
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.124%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 86 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held86 (16 July 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total298,480
Reactions total370
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Nov 2026, 20:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,480
Videos
≈85
Links
≈2,000

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
12m 10s
Average length
1m 21s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,302 reactions across 84 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,11785.8%
🔥594.53%
👍513.92%
👎171.31%
😁90.691%
👏80.614%
🥰60.461%
🤮50.384%
👻40.307%
😇30.23%
🙊20.154%
🤣20.154%
🤯20.154%
❤‍🔥10.077%
🍾10.077%
🎅10.077%
🐳10.077%
👀10.077%
👨‍💻10.077%
💔10.077%
10 further kinds100.768%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 85 of the 86 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,302 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 86 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 86 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Movies_Society. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 86 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 9 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
1.16%
1 of 86 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
13,400
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
14,500
over 85 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Measured over the 86 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 9 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 27 posts held from the last 30 days (7.41%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

9 Nov 2026, 11:24 UTC≈1,570 views3 reactions1 Starread 9 November 2026

You guys would love The movie streaming app we built Try it out and let me know what you think😊

❤3

7 Nov 2026, 21:52 UTC≈4,720 views19 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

🔥 New look at ‘DUNE: PART THREE.’ Timothée Chalamet was asked if the third and final film delivers a satisfying ending to the trilogy, “Absolutely. It didn’t feel like the bar dropped at all, Denis just changed the location of the bar. The movie’s its own thing,” he said. Denis Villeneuve also teased a significant shift in the film’s approach, promising a different experience while preserving the identity of the pr…

❤16👍3

4 Nov 2026, 12:57 UTC≈8,780 views15 reactions4 Starsread 9 November 2026

I built a movie streaming app you all would love It’s free Join to be among the first to try @Rebel_stream

❤15

4 Nov 2026, 12:48 UTC≈8,400 views3 reactions1 Starread 9 November 2026

Rate Primetime on a scale of 1-10

❤3

4 Nov 2026, 12:48 UTC≈8,490 views9 reactions2 Starsread 9 November 2026

​️Movie: Primetime 2026 Also Known As: Primetime Rating ⭐️: 7.1 / 10 (7.1 based on 28386 user ratings) | R | 1h 49min | Release Info: 25 / 9 / 2026 (United States) Genre: #Biography #Crime 🎭 #Drama #Thriller Language: #English Country of Origin: 🇺🇸 #United_States Story Line: In 2006, To Catch a Predator host Chris Hansen sets out to make television history. Directors Lance Oppenheim Writers Ajon Singh Luke Dittric…

❤9

3 Nov 2026, 12:17 UTC≈8,400 views8 reactionsread 9 November 2026

Rate Resident Evil on a scale of 1-10

❤7👀1

3 Nov 2026, 12:16 UTC≈8,400 views10 reactionsread 9 November 2026

​️Movie: Resident Evil 2026 Also Known As: Resident Evil Rating ⭐️: 7.5 / 10 (7.5 based on 125289 user ratings) | R | 1h 34min | Release Info: 18 / 9 / 2026 (United States) Genre: 🧟 #Horror Language: #English Country of Origin: 🇩🇪 #Germany,🇺🇸 #United_States,🇨🇿 #Czech_Republic,🇨🇦 #Canada,🇦🇺 #Australia,🇳🇿 #New_Zealand,🇫🇷 #France Story Line: A hapless courier is tasked with delivering a package to a remote hospital. He…

❤10

2 Nov 2026, 23:43 UTC≈8,330 views17 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

😍 Leonardo DiCaprio & Tobey Maguire

❤14👍1🤯1🥰1

30 Oct 2026, 23:08 UTC≈11,200 views30 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

😍 Chase Infiniti

❤23🔥5😁1😎1

29 Oct 2026, 09:07 UTC≈10,200 views10 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Rate The Uprising on a scale of 1-10

❤9🥰1

29 Oct 2026, 09:06 UTC≈9,520 views14 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

The Uprising (2026) Aʟsᴏ Kɴᴏᴡɴ As The Uprising 🏆 Usᴇʀ Rᴀᴛɪɴɢs: 6.3 / 10 | R (6.3 based on 3,102 user ratings) 🪅 Iᴍᴅʙ ID: tt36983905 🪬 Tɪᴛʟᴇ Tʏᴘᴇ: Movie 🕰 Dᴜʀᴀᴛɪᴏɴ: 2h 8min | 128 min Rᴇʟᴇᴀsᴇ Dᴀᴛᴇ: 11 / 9 / 2026 (United Kingdom) 🇬🇧 #United_Kingdom 💬 Lᴀɴɢᴜᴀɢᴇ: #English 📟 Gᴇɴʀᴇ: 💥 #Action 🎭 #Drama 🏛 #History 📋 Sᴛᴏʀʏ Lɪɴᴇ: Based on the true story of the uprising that inspired the legend of Robin Hood, Andrew Garfield …

❤14

28 Oct 2026, 16:44 UTC≈9,170 views15 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Video

"Is France gonna make it?" 👍 Watching the recent unrest unfold across France, this scene from HBO's Succession immediately came to mind. In Season 4, Episode 5, "Kill List," which aired on April 23, 2023, Lukas Matsson casually asks whether France is going to survive. What seemed like a darkly humorous exchange about Europe's uncertain future feels strangely relevant three and a half years later. Sometimes, Success…

❤12🥰2🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 86 posts we hold for @Movies_Society. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @Movies_Society as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
6 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
9 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
8 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Aug 2026, 19:51 UTCAnonymous Poll168 voters

If I create a paid experience for those of us in Accra will you guys come?😣

  1. Yes I will43%
  2. No I won’t13%
  3. If my time permits24%
  4. If it’s cheap37%

The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 86 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 9 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Wallpapers Arena™🦹🏽‍♀️❤️
@wallpapersarena · 108,495
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Movies Society🤩❤️” (@Movies_Society), 73,226 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Movies_Society.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.