8 measurements spanning 18 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,238–1,253 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Aug 2026, 17:46
1,240
-7
22 Aug 2026, 07:59
1,247
-2
18 Aug 2026, 17:58
1,249
-2
15 Aug 2026, 18:46
1,251
+1
11 Aug 2026, 21:23
1,250
+4
8 Aug 2026, 11:26
1,246
+1
7 Aug 2026, 23:02
1,245
no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:56
1,245
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.13%
avg views ÷ 1,240 subscribers
Avg views / post
26.4
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.63%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
20 (6 August 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
527
Reactions total
2
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 23:02 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1
50.0%
💯
1
50.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💭🎤Juan Pablo Montoya non crede nell'addio di Verstappen a Red Bull: lì è il re indiscusso, in Mercedes c'è Kimi che è il pupillo di Toto Wolff s in McLaren c'è il figlioccio di Zak Brown Lando Norris
🔴🔵🔵❌“Da quanto ho sentito prima del Gran Premio d’Austria la Red Bull e Max si sono incontrati e gli hanno detto che volevano eliminare le clausole che permettono a Verstappen di andarsene, Red Bull ha offerto 30 mili…
🚨🔵Red Bull ha trovato il modo di sostituire l'uscente Lambiase:
🔄🟢Al suo posto è stato ingaggiato Tom McCullogh, direttore delle prestazioni di Aston Martin per andare a ricoprire il rullo di responsabile dell'ingegneria del team angloaustriaco!
✍️😀 @il_ferrarista_solitario
🔘 @MotorsZone1
🔘 @ZoneNetwork1
🎤💭Stefano Domenicali entusiasta: quest'anno sta mostrando il meglio della F1
🔴✔️💸“Questa stagione ha mostrato il meglio del nostro sport, con gare competitive e storie avvincenti che stanno generando un forte coinvolgimento dei fan, con presenze, pubblico e impression digitali in costante crescita dall’inizio della stagione. Il nostro sport continua a dimostrare la sua adattabilità e creatività: il Gran Premio del…
💭🎤Johnny Herbert sicuro: il duo Mercedes - Antonelli deve temere soprattutto McLaren nella seconda parte di stagione
🔴‼️⚫🟠“Se fossi nei panni di Antonelli e della Mercedes la mia principale preoccupazione in questo momento sarebbe la McLaren alla vigilia della pausa sembrano aver fatto i progressi più significativi e al momento sembrano trovarsi in una posizione davvero ottima. Sarebbe fantastico vedere di nuovo l…
💭🎤Fred Vasseur commenta i regolamenti 2026: positiva la presenza di una competenza da mettere in campo ma dall'altra parte questo non è puro racing
🕯🔴🔴“Ho un sentimento misto. Da appassionato di motorsport, le gare sono senza dubbio più aperte rispetto a prima. Si può dire che siano un po’ artificiali, ma meno rispetto a quando c’era il DRS. Con quello bastava premere un pulsante. Ora bisogna gestire l’energia e r…
❌🔵‼️Se Helmut Marko non ha ancora commentato in modo esplicito la Red Bull è per motivi puramente contrattuali: al momento infatti l'austriaco deve ancora rispettare una clausola contrattuale da 8 milioni di euro che gli impone il silenzio fino a fine 2026
✍️😀 @il_ferrarista_solitario
🔘 @MotorsZone1
🔘 @ZoneNetwork1
🔴🔵🟢🔵Williams, Cadillac e Aston Martin in grossa difficoltà in qualifica:
📉⬇️🌟Sono gli unici tre team a non aver ancora mai raggiunto la Q3 in questa stagione!
🔘 @MotorsZone1
🔘 @ZoneNetwork1
🚨🔥Kimi Antonelli a -6 dal record di Lewis Hamilton:
⚫⚫️🏆Qualora vincesse altre 6 gare quest'anno diventerebbe il pilota Mercedes più vincente in una stagione a bordo di una Stella a tre punte!
🔘 @MotorsZone1
🔘 @ZoneNetwork1
🔵🔵🔥Nel 2023 Max Verstappen ha rasentato la perfezione:
🔝👑Su 620 punti massimi, l'olandese ne ha raccolti ben 575, ovvero il 92% dei punti totali!
🔘 @MotorsZone1
🔘 @ZoneNetwork1
📊🥇La classifica dei piloti sulla griglia attuale con più di 10 gare passate in testa al campionato:
🥇🔴🔴 Lewis Hamilton: 126
🥈🔵🔵 Max Verstappen: 78
🥉🟢🟢 Fernando Alonso: 52
4️⃣🟠🟠 Oscar Piastri: 15
🔘 @MotorsZone1
🔘 @ZoneNetwork1
💭🎤Toto Wolff abbassa le aspettative: è ancora troppo presto per dire che Kimi è il favorito al titolo
⚫📊📈“È ancora troppo presto per dirlo. Ci sono ancora tantissime gare da disputare. Un paio di ritiri possono cambiare completamente la situazione e noi non siamo stati impeccabili sul fronte dell’affidabilità. Dobbiamo quindi continuare a massimizzare ogni singola giornata, dal venerdì fino alla domenica”
✍️ @f…
💭🎤Liam Lawson applaude il team: la direzione è stata trovata molto presto e da allora la macchina è progredita bene
🔵🔵✔️“Onestamente, penso che all’inizio dell’anno non avessimo alcuna idea reale, ed era probabilmente molto aperto nel modo in cui ci sentivamo; non sapevamo quanto saremmo stati forti. La macchina era difficile all’inizio dell’anno, non ero per niente sicuro di come sarebbe andata la stagione, ma er…
Signed DESY
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MotorsZone1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
3
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
3
vacant every time we have ever looked
@MotorsZone1 named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@zonenetwork1 named in 20 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@il_ferrarista_solitario named in 7 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@formula1news named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Zone F1” (@MotorsZone1), 1,240 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MotorsZone1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.