Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for تشخیص مصلحت بازار

Channel

تشخیص مصلحت بازار

@MostafaPazooki

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,002subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001444288519
TypeChannel
Username@MostafaPazooki
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/MostafaPazooki

Growth

1,0021,0041,0037 August 2026 — 1,004 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,004 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,003 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,002 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 10 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,002–1,004 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 10:221,002-1
10 Aug 2026, 11:421,003-1
7 Aug 2026, 10:001,004no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:161,004first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
42.9%
avg views ÷ 1,002 subscribers
Avg views / post
430
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.09%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 July 2026
Posts held20 (23 December 202521 July 2026)
Views total860
Reactions total18
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 00:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

238 reactions across 20 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍11548.3%
🔥9037.8%
👎3313.9%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 238reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 December 2025 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Jul 2026, 04:25 UTC405 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

#صنعت_دارو در تاریخ صنعت دارویی دو گام صعودی ماژور در گذشته داریم: گام A با رشد کف تا سقف حدوداً ۶۰۰ درصدی گام B با رشد کف تا سقف حدوداً ۲۰۰۰ درصدی در حال حاضر اگر قرار به تکرار گام A باشد، ۱۲ درصد و اگر قرار به تکرار گام B باشد، ۲۳۰ درصد با اهداف احتمالی فاصله داریم کانال رسم شده نیز در تمام ادوار، شیب شکل‌گیری سقف و کف‌ها بوده است جمع بندی اینکه به مقاومت اول نزدیکیم ولی مومنتوم صعودی ماه‌های اخیر احتمال شکل‌گی

👍5🔥4

21 Jul 2026, 04:05 UTC455 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

#شاخص_کل هر دو گام صعودی اخیر ۴۷ درصد رشد رو رقم زدن لگ اول نزول در هر دو گام با هم برابر بوده به فرض تکرار روند اخیر صعود فعلی تا ۵۰۵۰ هزار واحد می‌تونه ادامه داشته باشه و احتمالاً در ۴۴۲۴ هزار واحد به حمایت معتبری برسیم بی اعتبار شدن این تحلیل هم در صورتی هست که صعود فعلی تداوم داشته باشه که در صورت وقوع بررسیش می‌کنیم 🔗 @MostafaPazooki

🔥8👍1

15 Jul 2026, 06:49 UTC597 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

#نقران درسته که خیلی تلاش کردن تا زیر ۱۰۰۰ تومن نره و اینجا حمایت مهمی داره، ولی یادمون نره که: - آخرین باری که قیمت توی این محدوده بود، NAV ابطال ۱۰۲۰ بود الان ۹۳۰ هست. - محدوده‌ی ۱۱۰۰-۱۱۴۰ محدوده‌ی مقاومتی مهمی هست. 🔗 @MostafaPazooki

👍3👎1🔥1

13 Jul 2026, 04:43 UTC606 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @aghval_alfolos

می‌خواهم یه درسی که خودم با بهای گزافی یاد گرفتم رو رایگان در اختیارتان قرار بدم وقتی یه روند صعودی وارد نقطه عطف میشه و وارد فاز اصلاحی یا ریزشی می‌شه ابتدا معامله‌گران در #فاز_انکار هستند یعنی فکر میکنند بازار اشتباه کرده مردم اشتباه میکنند و دُر غلطان رو به ثمن بخس دارند می‌فروشند حتما توی کانالی عساتید بازار با این دست پیامها مواجه شدید: - ترسوها دارن فرار میکنند - شما بفروشید ما محکم نشستیم داریم می‌خریم - زنگ

👍16🔥4

13 Jul 2026, 04:33 UTC516 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

#شاخص_هم_وزن تقریباً همه‌ی ارکان بازار به یک سطح مقاومت این مدلی رسیدن. شاخص هم وزن هم از این قافله عقب نیفتاده و مشاهده می‌کنیم که به سقف کانال صعودی واکنش داشته. روی تصویر مشخص شده. 🔗 @MostafaPazooki

👍5🔥1

12 Jul 2026, 07:17 UTC526 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#تتر #دلار #پایش https://t.me/GoldPedia/1766 🔗 @MostafaPazooki

🔥4

12 Jul 2026, 07:16 UTC451 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

#بورس #ارزش_ریالی اگر تحلیل ریپلای شده رو دیده باشید، مشاهده می‌کنید که بعد از برخورد به سقف کانال در حال اصلاح هستیم و نزدیکترین باند حمایتی در فاصله‌ی ۱۱ درصدی از قیمت‌های کنونی قرار داره که روی تصویر هم نشون داده شده. 🔗 @MostafaPazooki

🔥3

11 Jul 2026, 05:46 UTC549 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

#شاخص_کل از بعد از بازگشایی بازار در اردیبهشت‌ماه سال جاری (پس از جنگ)، شاهد صدور سیگنال خریدهای متوالی بودیم. در انتهای خردادماه، سقفی تشکیل شد که علیرغم نوسانات منفی، سیگنال فروش نداده بود و همین سقف هم در جریان معاملات هفته‌ی گذشته شکسته شد. اما، چنانچه امروز شاخص زیر کف روز سه‌شنبه‌ی هفته‌ی گذشته یعنی کمتر از ۵,۱۸۷ هزار واحد بسته شود، اولین سیگنال و اخطار جدی فروش صادر می‌شود. 🔗 @MostafaPazooki

🔥10👍1

10 Jul 2026, 17:22 UTC585 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

#کهربا #مکانیکی از ابتدای خردادماه که قیمت وارد فاز افت و اصلاح شده بود، سیگنال خرید هفته‌ی گذشته، اولین سیگنال خرید معتبری بود که همچنان پابرجاست. لبه‌ی پایینی محدوده (و اعتبار سیگنال خرید)، ۱۵,۴۲۵ تومان است که در تصویر هم نشان داده شده است. 🔗 @MostafaPazooki

🔥8

29 Jun 2026, 09:48 UTC956 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

#کهربا نرخ دلاری نمودار قیمت کهربا همان طور که در چارت مشخص است در یک قدمی خط روند معتبری است که بارها و بارها واکنش مثبت به آن را داشته‌ایم. 🔗 @MostafaPazooki

🔥7👍4

28 Jun 2026, 12:26 UTC975 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

#بورس #ارزش_ریالی در حالی که ارزش دلاری بورس به محدوده‌ی عرضه رسیده بود (تحلیل قبلی را ببینید)، مشاهده می‌کنیم که ارزش ریالی بورس هم به سقف کانال صعودی برخورد کرده. اینجا رو لزوماً نمیشه به عنوان پایان روند برچسب گذاری کرد، چرا که روند صعودی هست و صرفاً یک برخورد با سطح مقاومتی داشتیم و تأییدیه‌ی دیگری نداریم. ولی خب این مقاومت، مقاومت با اهمیتی هست که فشار عرضه رو افزایش میده و نباید از اون غافل بود. این وضعیت در ک

👍4🔥2

28 Jun 2026, 12:19 UTC811 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

#بورس #ارزش_دلاری این نمودار ارزش دلاری بورس هست. همون طور که می‌بینید تقریباً رفتار منظمی داشته. هر بار واکنش به گره‌ی تقاضا تا رشد و رسیدن به گره‌ی عرضه همراه بوده و و گره‌های عرضه هم آخرین گره‌های قبل از شکست کف قبلی بودن. این بار هم وضعیت به همین منوال هست. باید یکی از دو گره‌ی عرضه و تقاضای اخیر که واکنش بهش داشتیم شکسته بشه تا جهت بعدی حرکت مشخص بشه. در غیر این صورت احتمالاً همین‌جا باید صبوری کنیم تا اصلاح قی

👍7🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MostafaPazooki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“تشخیص مصلحت بازار” (@MostafaPazooki), 1,002 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MostafaPazooki.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.