Channel
@MosabHasanYOSEF
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
268subscribers
-37 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002026585910 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MosabHasanYOSEF |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MosabHasanYOSEF |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 04:27 | 268 | -37 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:49 | 305 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:19 | 305 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (2 July 2026 – 29 July 2026) |
| Views total | 776 |
| Reactions total | 48 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 07:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
101 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 80 | 79.2% | |
| 🤯 | 12 | 11.9% | |
| 😱 | 5 | 4.95% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 3.96% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 101reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A Muslim is not a race, not an ethnicity, not even a religion, it’s a totalitarian belief system that turns people into sleepwalkers trapped in a 7th-century dream state. They believe without knowing, obey without questioning, and love an idea more than actual human beings. What makes a Muslim a Muslim, when according to their own rules, most self-proclaimed Muslims don’t qualify?
👍11
No need to panic every time you hear a Muslim scream “Allahu Akbar”, it could be a birth, a meal, a wedding, a funeral, or a prayer. If you’re unlucky, you’ll only find out what it meant once the blade is already in your gut.
👍4🤯1
Stop calling it genocide. Call it martyrdom. A reason to celebrate, not to mourn.
👍6
Name: Mahmoud Abbas KGB Code Name: Krutov Recruited: Early 1980s (Moscow) Status: Active Current Position: Chairman of the Palestinian Authority
😱4
A Palestinian is someone who has been occupied by Palestine.
🤯2
The Palestinian Ten Deadly Sins: 1. Terrorizing as strategy 2. Rejecting peaceful solutions 3. Praising corrupt leaders 4. Abusing and indoctrinating children 5. Weaponizing sexual violence 6. Celebrating martyrdom 7. Weaponizing civilians 8. Embracing victimhood as identity 9. Believing “Palestine” was ever a real country 10. Choosing perpetual conflict over state-building
🤯1😱1
Palestinians redefined everything: War is now “genocide” Rape is “resistance” Hostages are “prisoners of war” Evacuating civilians is “ethnic cleansing” They didn’t change reality. They just wrote their own dictionary.
👍9
They celebrated the murder of Jewish children on October 7th, now they cry genocide over Arab children. If they actually cared, they would’ve condemned Hamas’s barbarism on October 8th.
👍2🤯2
Western leftists hear ‘Free Palestine’ and think national liberation. Muslims hear ‘Free Palestine’ and think Jihad to destroy the Jews. Same slogan. Two completely different goals.
👍3🤯2
The Two Ugly Choices Facing Trump Trump’s announcement today that the ceasefire is over has backed him into a corner with only two very ugly options. Option one: keep playing this game of limited strikes and sanctions. If he goes down this road, the Islamic Republic will eventually cross the nuclear threshold, dominate the Strait of Hormuz, and force the world to live with their new reality. They win. Option two: …
👍9
The father of the Palestinian revolution took ordinary Arab migrants and slapped a fake identity on them. He mixed a Roman colonial name, Arab nationalism, Islamic slogans, a British colonial invention, and an Iraqi keffiyeh with Egyptian origins, then told the world this was an ancient, indigenous people. And somehow, millions actually believed him.
👍6🤯1
Yasser Arafat was Egyptian. He literally invented the “Palestinian people” in the late 1960s. Now we’re supposed to believe this 60-year-old political invention is an ancient indigenous population. The historical illiteracy is actually embarrassing.
👍4🤯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MosabHasanYOSEF. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,318,901 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mosab Hassan Yousef” (@MosabHasanYOSEF), 268 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MosabHasanYOSEF.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.