I honestly don't know how people are still betting single matches when combos on @bet25com are this good Zero margin means no cut hidden in any leg The more legs you add, the bigger the difference. Take your time, compare the same slip with other books, and you'll see it yourself My Argentina 5-legger, starting with Boca vs River 👇 Boca 2.38 Newell's 2.08 Belgrano 1.94 Lanús 1.56 Platense 1.61 $1,000 → $22,914 …

Channel
MoonKing - Gems
@MoonKingGems
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
8,288subscribers
-1,165 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001843571347 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MoonKingGems |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MoonKingGems |
Topic
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Nov 2026, 07:56 | 8,288 | -29 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 14:09 | 8,317 | -163 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 21:26 | 8,480 | -2,856 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 19:39 | 11,336 | -13 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 17:28 | 11,349 | -910 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 18:38 | 12,259 | -48 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 16:35 | 12,307 | -36 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 19:50 | 12,343 | +1,662 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 17:10 | 10,681 | +1,985 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 01:46 | 8,696 | -54 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 04:18 | 8,750 | -101 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 04:11 | 8,851 | -51 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 07:19 | 8,902 | -172 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 07:19 | 9,074 | -185 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 15:44 | 9,259 | -299 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 07:22 | 9,558 | -430 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 00:37 | 9,988 | +1,024 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 11:18 | 8,964 | -727 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 13:39 | 9,691 | -233 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 04:57 | 9,924 | first reading |
Engagement
27 posts held, back to 12 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 12.9%
- avg views ÷ 8,288 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,070
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 3
- of 27 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 27 (12 September 2025 – 1 November 2026) |
| Views total | 3,200 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Nov 2026, 01:26 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 134
- Videos
- 4
- Links
- 88
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 18s
- Average length
- 18s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (33.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
The difference in combo payouts can be pretty surprising 👀 Most sportsbooks include a margin in their odds, and the more picks you add to a combo, the more that margin affects your potential return @bet25com takes a different approach with Zero Margin odds and a flat 5% fee charged just once Here’s how a $700 combo with 5 Ligue 1 picks compares Duel pays $54,521 Bet25 pays $56,220 Same picks, same stake, but $1,…
Some good football games coming up this weekend 👀 Aston Villa vs Man City should be an interesting one, especially with @bet25com offering 5.40 odds on Villa to win A $300 bet could turn into $1,539 if Villa pulls it off Not a bad potential return and with Bet25's Zero Margin Sportsbook, it's worth comparing the odds with other platforms before placing your bets Check it out here 👇 https://ref-bet25.com/t36ur8d3
100% RTP on @BiggerZ Originals is now live Basically, you play with zero house edge Still kinda crazy to see a casino actually go all the way to 0% Going to have some fun with this one 👀 If you want to join me on BiggerZ, sign up here 👇 biggerzplay.com/jzh0tizch And always use code MOONKING to get some benefits https://x.com/biggerz/status/2104587957198041423
This is probably the biggest update @BiggerZ has made to Originals so far They’ve pushed RTP to 100%, which means zero house edge on BiggerZ Originals They’re also putting up $1,000 to celebrate, with 10 people taking home $100 each Been playing Originals myself, so I’m definitely putting this to the test If you want to join me on BiggerZ, sign up here biggerzplay.com/jzh0tizch And always use code MOONKING to …
Going to give Mythical Multiplier a shot on @BiggerZ 👀 $20k prize pool, top 20 get paid and there’s $7k waiting for first place The goal is pretty simple, hit 5x+ multipliers across the selected games and keep climbing the leaderboard Let’s see how far I can take this one 👇 https://x.com/biggerz/status/2100659110077170044
Playing it safe on @BiggerZ paid off 🍻 Alcaraz got it done ✅ Medvedev got it done ✅ Tommy Paul got it done ✅ Nothing crazy with the picks, just backing 3 favorites and letting the multi do its thing. $100 in, $215.07 back. I’ll take +$115 on a safe bet any day. https://x.com/MoonKing___/status/2095849061182230881
Got a prediction for the WNBA All Star Game? 👀 Dustbit is giving away $50 Free Bets to people who correctly pick the winning team and the game's top three point shooter. To join ⬇️ ◼ Follow @dustbitcom on Instagram ◼ Like and repost the giveaway ◼ Comment your prediction with your Dustbit username Get your entry in before the game starts. Even though this one is on Instagram, it's worth following Dustbit on X as …
Less than two days left to the Hard Fork of $KAS Toccata will be the next step in the decentralization journey of Kaspa and you're not ready for the road this chart is about to take Next cycle we'll see $KAS at $1 👀
The $KAS comeback will be a subject of study in crypto and finance's history We've been setting new higher lows since early February That's 2 months of organic price growth The breakout is gonna be more explosive the longer we wait for it
2026 is the year of RWAs, confirmed ✅ If you're bullish on RWAs, you're bullish on $PLUME as well, whether you know it yet or not @plumenetwork and @NestCredit are going to onboard some seriously big institutional players ➡️ https://x.com/teddyP_xyz/status/2026821212995768342
Clear bonus structures are rare, and BitcoinVIP keeps it simple from the start. The first deposit is matched 100% up to $1,000, followed by a 25% bonus on the second and a 75% bonus on the third. That structure makes it easy to stretch your balance without dealing with complicated conditions. What adds a different angle is the exclusive content, including Player Battles and high RTP originals you won’t find elsewh…
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @MoonKingGems. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 3
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@MoonKingGems named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 5 posts, 4 November 2026 – 7 November 2026
named in 5 posts, 8 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MoonKing - Gems” (@MoonKingGems), 8,288 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MoonKingGems.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.