Channel
@MohammadKhanQajar
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,284subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002000712044 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MohammadKhanQajar |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 30 April 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MohammadKhanQajar |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 06:42 | 1,284 | +1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 1,283 | +2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 17:45 | 1,281 | -1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 23:45 | 1,282 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:24 | 1,283 | -2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:22 | 1,285 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:52 | 1,288 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 1,289 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
714 reactions across 20 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 432 | 60.5% | |
| 👍 | 120 | 16.8% | |
| 👎 | 84 | 11.8% | |
| 👏 | 37 | 5.18% | |
| 🤔 | 16 | 2.24% | |
| 😭 | 8 | 1.12% | |
| 🙏 | 6 | 0.84% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 0.56% | |
| 🗿 | 4 | 0.56% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.14% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 714 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 February 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
شواهد نشان میدهد جنگ تمام عیار دیگری نزدیک است حتی بزرگتر از جنگ۳۹روزه! این بار احتمالا زیرساخت های حیاتی کشور ضربات سختی بخورند! در جنگ قبل کشور صدها میلیارد دلار آسیب خورد که بدترین توافق هم چنین آسیب نمیداشت، امیدوارم اندک عقلانیتی در حکومت باشد و جلوی جنگی فاجعه بار را بگیرد! @MohammadKhanQajar
❤15😭8👍6👎4🤔3💯1
بیش از ۵۰۰ سال قبل ایران و عثمانی جنگی وجودی را علیه هم آغاز کردند که چند صد سال ادامه داشت، ابتدا طرفین اهداف روشنی برای جنگ داشتند، اما پس از سال ها جنگ، هیچ کس حتی نمیدانست چرا میجنگند! این جنگ ها مردم عادی را بدبخت کرد و باعث پیشرفت سریع رقبای بزرگی مثل روسیه و اروپا شد. @MohammadKhanQajar
❤21👍10👎1🤔1
دوستان عزیز، اینکه مطالب اینستاگرام و تلگرام بعضاً شبیه به هم هست، به این دلیل هست که دنبال کنندگان ما متفاوت هستند و بعضی ها فقط اینستاگرام یا فقط تلگرام دارن و مجبوریم مطالب رو در هر دو جا قرار بدیم و از این بابت از کسانی که هر دو جا یعنی اینستاگرام و تلگرام ما رو با هم دارن عذرخواهی میکنم، البته قبلا که بیشتر وقت داشتم و شرایط هم عادی بود، احتمالا خیلی ها به یاد دارید که خیلی مطالب و روایت های طولانی تاریخی رو فقط…
❤18👍5
با این منطق که آمریکا و اسرائیل به زیرساخت های جمهوری اسلامی حمله میکنتد و نه زیرساخت های ایران و مردم ایران، مغول ها هم شهرهای خوارزمشاهیان را آتش میزدند و نه شهرهای ایران! کما اینکه نتانیاهو هم صراحتا چنگیزخان را الگوی سیاسی و نظامی خود میداند! تکلیف روشن است... @MohammadKhanQajar
❤16👍3👎3
در جنگ جهانی اول و دوم، سربازان غربی وارد خاک ما شدند و با ایجاد قحطی بار اول دو میلیون و بار دوم حدود چهار میلیون نفر از مردم ما را کشتند، چرا بعضی ها آنقدر درک پایین دارند که نمیفهمند غربی ها اگر برای بار سوم هم وارد خاک ما شوند، همان کاری که دو بار قبلی کردند را تکرار میکنند؟ @MohammadKhanQajar
❤19👏5👎3👍1🔥1🤔1
لحظه امضای تفاهمنامه (توافق اولیه) بین آمریکا با جمهوری اسلامی ایران توسط دونالد ترامپ رئیس جمهور آمریکا این همان ترامپ است که با افتخار از برجام خارج شد و در طول جنگ خواهان تسلیم بی قید و شرط شده بود، حال توافقی را امضا میکند که طبق آن گویا امتیازات بسیار بیشتری نسبت به برجام را به جمهوری اسلامی ایران میدهد. @MohammadKhanQajar
❤14👍4🤔2👎1
آنچه در ۵۰۰ سال گذشته (از صفوی به بعد) از ایران در مقابل همه خطرها مراقبت کرده در کنار فداکاری فراوان نیروهای نظامی، غیرت و تعصب مردم نسبت به ایران و هرچه مال ایران است بوده، دشمنان ایران احمق نیستند، میدانند قبل از نابودی مرزهای ایران باید غیرت مردم نسبت به وطنشان را نابود کنند! @MohammadKhanQajar
❤16👍6👎2
فراموش نمیکنیم کسانی که برای جانباختگان دی ماه اشک تمساح میریختند، برای حمله به ایران آویزان بیگانه شدند، قتل عام کودکان بیگناه میناب را مسخره کردند، از بین رفتن خانه و زندگی مردم را جشن گرفتند، نابودی زیرساخت های ایران را بی اهمیت دانستند و حتی خواهان حمله اتمی به ایران شدند! و البته صدها خیانت دیگر به مردم مظلوم ایران... @MohammadKhanQajar
❤31👏12👎11🤔3
طبق اعلام ترامپ و تایید مقامات ایران، جنگ آمریکا و اسرائیل با ایران پایان یافت. زنده باد صلح و صلح طلب و لعنت بر جنگ و جنگ طلب. زنده باد صلح طلبان شجاعی که هرگز دچار بیماری جنگ طلبی نشدند و همیشه شجاعانه از صلح دفاع میکنند. امیدوارم جنگ برای همیشه از ایران عزیزمان دور باشد. @MohammadKhanQajar
❤29👎10👏3👍2🤔1
تندروهای جنگطلب، چه طرفدار حکومت و چه مخالف حکومت، تا ایران را ویران نبینند، آرام نمیگیرند! @MohammadKhanQajar
❤20👍12👎10
جنگی که فارسی زبانان خارج از ایران با شعار زندگی معمولی آرزویش را داشتند، مردم ایران را بدبختتر کرد! بسیاری از مردم خانه و زندگی و شغلشان را از دست دادند، خیلی از بیگناهان کشته شدند، همه چیز نسبت به قبل از جنگ بسیار گرانتر شده و هر روز گرانتر میشود و آینده ای تاریکتر از همیشه... @MohammadKhanQajar
👍29👎7❤6🗿1
این سخن که «ایران ۲۵۰۰ سال در برابر خطرات ایستاده و از پا درنیامده» کاملا غلط و ناشی از بیسوادی یا غرض سیاسی است! پس از حمله اعراب تا قبل از صفویه حدود ۹۰۰ سال کشوری به نام ایران وجود نداشت و نام ایران صرفا در شعر و قصه ها بود! «حیات ایران» نامیرا نیست، نیاز به فداکاری ها دارد، نه که بیگانهوار تیشه به ریشه آن زد! @MohammadKhanQajar
❤24👏7👎2🤔2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MohammadKhanQajar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 778,555 of 1,629,808 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“سلطان محمد خان قاجار” (@MohammadKhanQajar), 1,284 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MohammadKhanQajar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.