لعنت به دلِ سنگ و سیاهی که سبب شد داغت به دلِ گنبد خضرا بنشیند... #شهادت_امام_حسن_علیهالسلام #قاسم_صرافان @Mofareghat128

Channel
مُفارِقَت
@Mofareghat128
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,084subscribers
-23 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001523215702 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Mofareghat128 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Mofareghat128 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:06 | 5,084 | -5 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 10:17 | 5,089 | -7 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:01 | 5,096 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:52 | 5,102 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:33 | 5,107 | first reading |
Engagement
29 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 14.5%
- avg views ÷ 5,084 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 737
- 28 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 28
- of 29 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 29 (18 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 20,636 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
تاریخ از توانِ قلم نااُمید شد لفظِ وفات چیست؟! پیمبر شهید شد فتنه، دسیسه، مکِر فراوان شروع شد با رفتنش وقاحتِ شیطان شروع شد دیوِ زمانه، شمعِ مُبین را به غار بُرد لعنت بر آنکه لفظِ «لَیَهجُر» به کار بُرد... #شهادت_پیامبر_صلواتاللهعلیه #بردیا_محمدی @Mofareghat128
مردم، رسولِ عالم و آدم شهید شد رحلت نکرد احمدِ خاتم شهید شد... #محمدحسین_رحیمیان #شهادت_پیامبراکرم_صلیاللهعلیهوآله @Mofareghat128
سر به زانوی حسینش حسن آخر جان داد کاش بالای سرِ خود حسنی داشت حسین هر دو نورند و تفاوت سرِ همسر دارند بد زنی داشت حسن، شیر زنی داشت حسین... گروه #یامظلوم_علیهالسلام @Mofareghat128
از سپیدیهای مویش روضههایش را بخوان در سیاهیهای زلفش روزگارش را ببین... #شهادت_امام_حسن_علیهالسلام #رضا_قاسمی @Mofareghat128
علی ماند و پیِ کاری همه رفتند...؛ پیغمبر_ به دوشِ این و آن نگذاشت، حتی پیکرِ خود را... #شهادت_پیامبر_صلواتاللهعلیه #محمدحسین_ملکیان @Mofareghat128
حرم امیرالمومنین علیهالسلام نائبالزیاره و دعاگو بودم🙏🏻
گر صد هزاربار به دنیا قدم نهم من روی میکنم به نجف صدهزار بار... #سیدپوریا_هاشمی #غدیریام @Mofareghat128
سلام و ارادت یه درد دل داشتم و اون اینه که شأن و مقام زیارتِ حضرات معصومین علیهالسلام متاسفانه رعایت نمیشه و خیلیها شوربختانه از زیارتِ عتبات نعوذبالله به عنوان پله برای دیده شدن در سوشال مدیا استفاده میکنن و این رو نمیدونم چه اسمی روش بذارم ولی احساس میکنم از عدم معرفت و عدم شناخت میاد که متاسفانه در بینالحرمین شریف خیابانهای اطراف حرم مطهر که اسم نمیبرم و سایر مکانهای مطهر شده جایی برای سلفی گرفتن عکس گرفتن و …
شب زیارتی کربلاالمقدسه دعاگو هستم🙏🏻
تو حاکمیّ و مرا سر بر آستانۀ توست مکن خرابیِ مُلکِ دلم که خانۀ توست... #عماد_فقیه_کرمانی #شب_زیارتی @Mofareghat128
ترابِ بوترابم، جایی از هفت آسمان بهتر غبارِ خانهاش از قصرهای آن جهان بهتر... #رضا_قاسمی شبی که گذشت حرم امیرالمومنین علیهالسلام... @Mofareghat128
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @Mofareghat128. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,001,507 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Tak_Mesra · 97,631
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مُفارِقَت” (@Mofareghat128), 5,084 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Mofareghat128.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.