anyone interested in running this channel?
👍40👎18🤔9🥱7❤4

Channel
@ModuleHub
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
5,909subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001231685188 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ModuleHub |
| Description | Welcome To ModuleHub !!! Craving For Modules? Well we got you covered in that case. This channel Features all kinds of modules and we know good ones are hard to find so let us do the work while you sit back and enjoy ❤️ Support Group : @ModuleHubChat |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ModuleHub |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:12 | 5,909 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:00 | 5,911 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:00 | 5,911 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 February 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
2,832 reactions across 20 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💩 | 660 | 23.3% | |
| 👍 | 474 | 16.7% | |
| 😢 | 438 | 15.5% | |
| ❤ | 417 | 14.7% | |
| 😁 | 228 | 8.05% | |
| 🔥 | 133 | 4.70% | |
| 👎 | 90 | 3.18% | |
| 🤬 | 90 | 3.18% | |
| 👏 | 56 | 1.98% | |
| 🤮 | 50 | 1.77% | |
| 🕊 | 38 | 1.34% | |
| 🤯 | 35 | 1.24% | |
| 🤔 | 34 | 1.20% | |
| 😱 | 22 | 0.777% | |
| 🎉 | 18 | 0.636% | |
| 🥰 | 17 | 0.6% | |
| 🤩 | 13 | 0.459% | |
| 🥱 | 7 | 0.247% | |
| 💔 | 6 | 0.212% | |
| 🍾 | 3 | 0.106% | |
| 1 further kind | 3 | 0.106% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,832reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 February 2022 to 15 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
anyone interested in running this channel?
👍40👎18🤔9🥱7❤4
Osiris A Simple Movie and Show Tracking app built using Flutter. • Features - Movie and TV Show Search - Personalized Watchlist - Discover New Content - Data Synchronization - Great UI (Biased Opinion) It's Another Personal project of mine and it's still unfinished, Osiris is still in Beta and I would love you guys to try it out and give your feedback and report back bugs. • Credits : @Notabot69 • Download : [CLI…
👍56❤15👎13🔥7😁2
It's my personal project as I'm learning Android app development, Please let me know your feedback 🙂
❤45👍5🔥4🍾3
Made a small project this week, A Playground for OpenAI Text Completion engine for native android. It's a simple android app that lets you tweak around with lot of parameters of GPT-3 Text Completion and Lets you see the change in behaviour of the text being generated. Things you can modify in the app. 1. Text Completion Model 2. Temperature 3. Top P 4. Tokens 5. Presence Penalty I learnt a lot about Jetpack Compos…
👍52❤3👨💻3👏2
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤1👍1
https://github.com/reisxd/revanced-builder Here's an Easy to use Tool that can help you install Revanced on your Device
🕊38❤8👍7💔6🥰1
Dead 💀
💩308😢78👏29😱18👎15🔥15🤮11🤔8
CC : @lawnchairci
❤95💩61👍27😁17🔥14🤩6🥰3🎉2
Pixel Launcher Mod Modify Pixel Launcher with a Breeze • Requirements - Root • Features - Custom icons, including icon packs, adaptive icon packs. - Custom themed icons, add themed icons to apps that don't yet have them officially - Generate themed icons from supported normal icons - Replace the At a Glance or Search Box with a widget of your choice - Hide apps from the app drawer - Resize widgets beyond their orig…
👍73🔥31💩25❤14👏6🤩6👎5🤬4
Sticker, posted without a caption
👍4❤1🔥1
This is why I love this community. Few developers have already started working on bringing back the Vanced Project. Checkout the Code > https://github.com/ReVancedTeam Also Consider spamming their discord for any queries Discord : https://discord.gg/revanced There are many random alternative popping up these days but this one seems Promising. Thanks @dreadnoughtOO7 for sharing
❤182👍26🤯11🎉9👏8🔥7💩4😁3
Sticker, posted without a caption
💩72😢24👍17🤬13❤3🔥3🤯3👎2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ModuleHub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Have you ever used a GSI?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 February 2022 to 15 February 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MODULE HUB” (@ModuleHub), 5,909 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ModuleHub.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.