Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

MOCHIE STORE, ALWAYS OPENN >⁠.⁠<

@MochieStore

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

2,329subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001211958472
TypeChannel
Username@MochieStore
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/MochieStore

Growth

2,3292,3392,3346 August 2026 — 2,339 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,339 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,338 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,334 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,329 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,328–2,341 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 04:372,329-5
10 Aug 2026, 06:412,334-4
7 Aug 2026, 10:102,338-1
7 Aug 2026, 00:012,339no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:532,339first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 October 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.28%
avg views ÷ 2,329 subscribers
Avg views / post
53.0
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held20 (9 October 20234 August 2026)
Views total106
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Advertising

Ad load
5.00%
1 of 20 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
87.0
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
811
over 19 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
20260721101214013415010300166600789349238121 July 202621 July 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 October 2023 to 4 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

21 Jul 2026, 06:28 UTC87 viewsread 7 August 2026
Advertisementerid 20260721101214013415010300166600789349238

happy tuesday https://link.dana.id/danakaget?c=sxnsz5u5v&r=ciUStg&orderId=20260721101214013415010300166600789349238

6 Jun 2026, 16:14 UTC267 viewsread 7 August 2026

selalu open yaa, yang mau order langsung ke @mochiestore_bot avail formless jugaa

9 Feb 2026, 15:17 UTC638 viewsread 7 August 2026

open promo netf 1u1w 8k ajaa ada 5 slots chat ke @mochiestore_bot 🤍

12 Dec 2025, 23:00 UTC733 viewsread 7 August 2026

Ciao 👋🏻 Mochie Store OPEN! 🏷️ Merrily greetings to those who have waited for us! Tho now, we are open. Please, read terms and condition before ordering and enjoy our wonderful service, much appreciation! . 𓍢 Catalogue . 𓍢 Regulations . 𓍢 Bot Order . 𓍢 Call Center . 𓍢 Testimonials . 𓍢 Sub Unit {✿} Contact @mochiestore_bot for order yaa, always open selama admin online (only

11 Dec 2025, 23:03 UTC566 viewsread 7 August 2026

Ciao 👋🏻 Mochie Store OPEN! 🏷️ Merrily greetings to those who have waited for us! Tho now, we are open. Please, read terms and condition before ordering and enjoy our wonderful service, much appreciation! . 𓍢 Catalogue . 𓍢 Regulations . 𓍢 Bot Order . 𓍢 Call Center . 𓍢 Testimonials . 𓍢 Sub Unit {✿} Contact @mochiestore_bot for order yaa, always open selama admin online (only

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MochieStore. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Nov 2024, 08:05 UTCAnonymous Poll163 voters

gaiis mau nanya dong, kalian lebih suka order melalui bot order atau personal chat?

  1. bot order42%
  2. personal chat58%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Oct 2023, 00:55 UTCAnonymous Poll406 voters

Ganti nama store?

  1. Boleh28%
  2. Jangan72%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 October 2023 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 247,309 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MOCHIE STORE, ALWAYS OPENN >⁠.⁠<” (@MochieStore), 2,329 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MochieStore.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.