Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for MoC Alpha

Channel

MoC Alpha

@MoC_Alpha

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,057subscribers

-575 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001314469103
TypeChannel
Username@MoC_Alpha
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/MoC_Alpha

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@MoC_Alpha/4751 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC@globalrashidfamily/102435 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC1.00under a minute
@MoC_Alpha/4774 · this entry12 Aug 2026, 11:56 UTC@globalrashidfamily/1031312 Aug 2026, 14:17 UTC1.002.4 hours
@globalrashidfamily/1030512 Aug 2026, 05:49 UTC@MoC_Alpha/4776 · this entry12 Aug 2026, 14:57 UTC1.009.1 hours
@MoC_Alpha/4784 · this entry15 Aug 2026, 12:36 UTC@globalrashidfamily/1033915 Aug 2026, 17:50 UTC1.005.2 hours
@globalrashidfamily/1034516 Aug 2026, 10:37 UTC@MoC_Alpha/4788 · this entry16 Aug 2026, 10:37 UTC1.00under a minute
@globalrashidfamily/1035817 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC@MoC_Alpha/4791 · this entry17 Aug 2026, 17:12 UTC1.0071 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@globalrashidfamily8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.003.2 hours@globalrashidfamily (5–3)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 5 of the 5 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 100 comparable posts for this entry, running 31 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

9,0579,6329,344.56 August 2026 — 9,632 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,624 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,604 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,595 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,582 subscribers19 August 2026 — 9,554 subscribers23 August 2026 — 9,533 subscribers26 August 2026 — 9,506 subscribers29 August 2026 — 9,490 subscribers1 September 2026 — 9,469 subscribers5 September 2026 — 9,459 subscribers10 September 2026 — 9,421 subscribers14 September 2026 — 9,408 subscribers18 September 2026 — 9,385 subscribers29 September 2026 — 9,330 subscribers6 October 2026 — 9,279 subscribers13 October 2026 — 9,245 subscribers15 October 2026 — 9,225 subscribers18 October 2026 — 9,210 subscribers21 October 2026 — 9,188 subscribers24 October 2026 — 9,170 subscribers27 October 2026 — 9,145 subscribers30 October 2026 — 9,132 subscribers2 November 2026 — 9,110 subscribers5 November 2026 — 9,084 subscribers8 November 2026 — 9,057 subscribers6 August 20268 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 94 days, net -575. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,971–9,718 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 12:109,057-27
5 Nov 2026, 11:559,084-26
2 Nov 2026, 15:069,110-22
30 Oct 2026, 09:369,132-13
27 Oct 2026, 14:219,145-25
24 Oct 2026, 10:179,170-18
21 Oct 2026, 09:179,188-22
18 Oct 2026, 14:599,210-15
15 Oct 2026, 22:019,225-20
13 Oct 2026, 03:279,245-34
6 Oct 2026, 16:169,279-51
29 Sept 2026, 08:429,330-55
18 Sept 2026, 21:389,385-23
14 Sept 2026, 03:369,408-13
10 Sept 2026, 12:569,421-38
5 Sept 2026, 07:579,459-10
1 Sept 2026, 13:139,469-21
29 Aug 2026, 08:139,490-16
26 Aug 2026, 11:159,506-27
23 Aug 2026, 03:269,533first reading

Engagement

102 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.91%
avg views ÷ 9,057 subscribers
Avg views / post
807
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.398%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 102 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 21 of 22 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held102 (31 July 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total17,761
Reactions total69
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Nov 2026, 23:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,690
Videos
≈877
Links
≈2,860

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 20s
Average length
5s

Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

277 reactions across 92 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤22380.5%
🤯217.58%
👍207.22%
🐳72.53%
🔥31.08%
🏆10.361%
👀10.361%
👌10.361%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 97 of the 102 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 288 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 102 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 102 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @MoC_Alpha. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 102 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 22 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 17:28 UTC266 views2 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

→ LAST 24 HOURS IN #CRYPTO BTC: $75797 ( +0.16%) ETH: $2,238 ( +0.54%) Fear & Greed: 25 Extreme Fear → Key Levels & Liquidations Support: $74.8K | Resistance:$76.7K $72.49M Total Liquidations ($48.16M long) → Major New • U.S. expands naval blockade against Iran. • U.S. sanctions 8 Canadian firms over Iran-linked crypto activity. • Polymarket trader reportedly makes $77K before poll release. • Keplr Wallet reports…

❤2

4 Nov 2026, 17:33 UTC446 viewsread 10 November 2026
Photo

→ LAST 24 HOURS IN #CRYPTO BTC: $80630 (+4.08%) ETH: $2,436 (+6.34%) Fear & Greed: 34 Fear → Key Levels & Liquidations Support: $79.3K | Resistance:$81.6 $960.74 Total Liquidations ($561.37M Short) → Major New • Tether’s gold reserves grow 59% since year-end, reaching a record level. • US stock market adds $900 billion in market value at the opening bell. • Riot Platforms sells 10,599 BTC in Q3. • US Dollar record…

2 Nov 2026, 17:09 UTC507 views1 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

→ LAST 24 HOURS IN #CRYPTO BTC: $77477 (-0.79%) ETH: $2,246 (+0.12%) Fear & Greed: 37 Fear → Key Levels & Liquidations Support: $76.2K | Resistance: $78.8K $213M Total Liquidations ($131.95M Long) → Major News • OKX reports $27.8B in BTC, ETH, USDT and USDC reserves. • Tether burned $2B worth of USDT on Ethereum. • Binance hackers started swapping $46.4M in stolen SOL for BTC through Relay. • Bitmine bought 8,573 …

❤1

2 Nov 2026, 09:28 UTC≈4,970 views7 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

RBI MONITORS CRYPTO CARDS More Indians are using offshore crypto cards for daily payments, shopping, and travel. RBI and FIU are examining these services over possible violations of India’s payment rules and FEMA regulations.

❤7

1 Nov 2026, 16:43 UTC516 views3 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

→ LAST 24 HOURS IN #CRYPTO BTC: $78012 (+0.29%) ETH: $2,246 (+0.30%) Fear & Greed: 34 Fear → Key Levels & Liquidations Support: $76.2K | Resistance: $78.8K $87.46M Total Liquidations ($53.59M Long) → Major News • China calls for tougher action against crypto-related corruption. • Over $4B reportedly withdrawn from Binance after the $6.3B hack. • Kalshi traders give Democrats 72% and Republicans 28% chance of contr…

🔥3

29 Oct 2026, 16:53 UTC608 views3 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

→ LAST 24 HOURS IN #CRYPTO BTC: $81564 (+1.25%) ETH: $2,360 (+1.17%) Fear & Greed: 51 Neutral → Key Levels & Liquidations Support: $79.2K | Resistance: $81.8K $411M Total Liquidations ($209.3M Long) → Major News • Fed holds rates at 3.75%–4.00%. • User loses $50K in USDT to an Ethereum address poisoning scam. • Tokenized stocks hit $4.63B market cap. • Public companies hold 1.3M BTC, up 31% in 14 months. • Paki…

❤3

28 Oct 2026, 17:42 UTC579 views3 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

→ LAST 24 HOURS IN #CRYPTO BTC: $80,555 (-0.11%) ETH: $2,335 (-0.09%) Fear & Greed: 51 Neutral → Key Levels & Liquidations Support: $79.2K | Resistance: $81.8K $165.37M Total Liquidations ($110.5M Short) → Major News • Morpho RWA deposits surpass $2B. • Pumpfun launches Hyperliquid-powered futures. • Bank of Canada hikes rates to 2.50%. • Ripple partners with Coinbase to expand $RLUSD. • $OUSD adds $794M in market…

👍3

26 Oct 2026, 17:05 UTC655 views6 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

→ LAST 24 HOURS IN #CRYPTO BTC: $80,491 (+0.53%) ETH: $2,330 (+0.16%) Fear & Greed: 45 Neutral → Key Levels & Liquidations Support: $79.2K | Resistance: $80.6K $197.72M Total Liquidations ($129.54M Long) → Major News • US Bitcoin ETFs see $137.9M in outflows. • Ethereum delays its Glamsterdam upgrade. • China targets 2030 for its national blockchain network. • JPMorgan expands JPM Coin to Ethereum. • HSBC launch…

❤6

24 Oct 2026, 17:51 UTC607 views3 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

→ LAST 24 HOURS IN #CRYPTO BTC: $80174 (-1.78%) ETH: $2,316 (-3.75%) Fear & Greed: 51 Neutral → Key Levels & Liquidations Support: $79.1K | Resistance: $82.6K $813M Total Liquidations ($689M Long) → Major News • UK says DeFi projects must follow regulations. • Milei demands compensation after the $LIBRA case dismissal. • US dollar lost 26% of its buying power since 2016. • 32,380 BTC ($2.6B) flowed in, the biggest…

❤3

23 Oct 2026, 17:51 UTC574 views2 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

→ LAST 24 HOURS IN #CRYPTO BTC: $81, 660 (+0.44%) ETH: $2,409 (+0.98%) Fear & Greed: 48 Neutral → Key Levels & Liquidations Support: $81.4K | Resistance: $81.7K $255.06M Total Liquidations ($163.22M Long) → Major News • Bitcoin falls near $81,500 as tech stocks sell off. • US spot Bitcoin ETFs record $635.6M in outflows. • Phantom launches Kalshi prediction markets for US users. • HSBC launches its HKD backed st…

❤2

22 Oct 2026, 16:45 UTC578 views4 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

→ LAST 24 HOURS IN #CRYPTO BTC: $81,570 (-2.94%) ETH: $2,396 (-3.02%) Fear & Greed: 48 Neutral → Key Levels & Liquidations Support: $81.2K | Resistance: $81.9K $371.34M Total Liquidations ($318.27M Long) → Major News • Coinbase's Irish unit faces a €3.25M regulatory fine. • CoinDCX denies new hack claims amid wallet transfer concerns. • Ethereum researchers propose reducing transaction finality time. • Coinbase …

❤3🏆1

20 Oct 2026, 18:06 UTC618 views1 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

→ LAST 24 HOURS IN #CRYPTO BTC: $82,498 (+0.81%) ETH: $2,431 (+1.11%) Fear & Greed: 51 Neutral → Key Levels & Liquidations Support: $82.2K | Resistance: $83.1K $295.82M Total Liquidations ($125.35M Long) → Major News • Switzerland Approves Its First Spot Bitcoin ETF for Retail Investors. • Major US Companies Push Back Against Stock Tokenization Plans. • BitFlyer Reports Delays in Stellar (XLM) Deposits Due to an…

❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 102 posts we hold for @MoC_Alpha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

MoC Airdrop💰
@MoC_Airdrop · 27,741
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 8 September 2026
Geography_Anirudh Malik
@geography_5 · 26,536
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 11 September 2026
Master of Crypto
@mastercryptohq · 256,538
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
Planeta Nostra Channel
@eggtapperchannel · 39,677
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MoC Alpha” (@MoC_Alpha), 9,057 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MoC_Alpha.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.