Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for معتز عويس | قناة التليغرام

Channel

معتز عويس | قناة التليغرام

@Mo3tz_Ewais

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

746subscribers

+17 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002056959427
TypeChannel
Username@Mo3tz_Ewais
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Mo3tz_Ewais

Growth

729746737.58 August 2026 — 729 subscribers8 August 2026 — 729 subscribers16 August 2026 — 746 subscribers8 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 726–749 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 04:34746+17
8 Aug 2026, 03:33729no change
8 Aug 2026, 03:15729first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.8%
avg views ÷ 746 subscribers
Avg views / post
200
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.55%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held18 (25 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total3,604
Reactions total56
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 03:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

56 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2035.7%
👍1832.1%
💯712.5%
🎉58.93%
😁23.57%
👌11.79%
💔11.79%
🤣11.79%
🥰11.79%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 56reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 06:59 UTC35 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://youtube.com/shorts/S0YnO2EHoSU?si=0VKWF_doKegOJC2s

👍3

5 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC87 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

جُنّ جنون الحدادية بعد المقطع ! هكذا هم لا يريدون إفشاء الخبايا !

🎉5💯3👍1

5 Aug 2026, 00:27 UTC256 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://youtube.com/shorts/_nRyNwuRPU0?si=EspGu9CN_pOs06uT

3👍2🤣1

2 Aug 2026, 10:31 UTC151 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://youtube.com/shorts/2mdqXDF8LKw?si=14Qtay3pseca7oBz

👍1

31 Jul 2026, 21:27 UTC189 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @alsayed_ah

التفقه المفصّل في أحاديث الطائفة المنصورة: https://youtu.be/ATqHrK8JO4k

🥰1

31 Jul 2026, 21:27 UTC147 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @alsayed_ah

مع انتهاء المدّة المعلنة للتسجيل في برنامج الجيل الصاعد الإلكتروني، نعلن بشكل استثنائي عن روابط التسجيل مرة أخرى بهذه المناسبة: رابط التسجيل: https://jeelacademy.app/auth/sign-up للاطلاع على تفاصيل المسارات: https://t.me/JeelAcademySA/296 شرح طريقة التسجيل : https://youtu.be/h8LJNhcqJcA?si=qRYKR8ib95SIm-8E طريقة الدخول إلى قنوات المسارات بعد إتمام التسجيل : https://t.me/JeelAcademySA/348

1

31 Jul 2026, 15:43 UTC383 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

انتشرت هذه الصورة في فضائح ابن شمس التي تظهر تباعًا و هي صورة قديمة لعائلته المجرمة التي قتلت أهلنا في سوريا . لاحظوا في هذه الصورة هذا الرجل المسكين المصاب و من الشهداء أيضًا الذين جمعهم خال ابن شمس المجرم كانوا من ذوي الاحتياجات الخاصة ! انظر كيف يستقوون على هذا الضعيف و هؤلاء الضعفاء ! فلك أن تتخيل شخصية كحمودي نشأت في ظل و كنف هذا الإجرام و الحقد ... فكيف ستفعل بأهل الإسلام ؟! لربما لا يجيد حمودي حمل السلاح،

👍31💔1

31 Jul 2026, 14:41 UTC144 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://youtube.com/shorts/mJdyP367tQU?si=GoDhjkLNzF5U2Wm7

👍1

30 Jul 2026, 11:14 UTC206 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

من الشيء المخزي في وقتنا المعاصر : انشغال كثير من الدعاة بالمباهلة التي وقعت بين المشايخ الفضلاء و حدادي ألمانيا ! و التعليق عليها و التهكم عليها . و لم نرَ منهم أي ردود على #الحدادية جرثومة الغلو الفكري الذي بُحّت أصوات الشباب في الرد على هذه الجرثومة و مناشدة العلماء و الدعاة بالرد عليهم، فلم نجد آذانًا صاغية ! و بينما كنتم كذلك، هل جئتم اليوم لتنشغلوا بالمباهلة و التعليق عليها بدلًا من دكّ الحدادية و انهاء فتنت

👍5

29 Jul 2026, 06:23 UTC184 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

قال الإمام ابن رجب الحنبلي - رحمه الله - : ﮼ من لم يعرف ثواب الأعمال، ثقلت عليه في جميع الأحوال ﮼

4

29 Jul 2026, 06:22 UTC184 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

قال الإمام ابن قدامة المقدسي الحنبلي - رحمه الله - : ... واعلم أنَّ أكثر الناس إنَّما هلكوا لخوف مذمَّة الناس ، وحُبِّ مدحهم ...

4

28 Jul 2026, 21:33 UTC166 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @alsayed_ah

هناك سببان رئيسيان لما نراه من عبث وفوضى وغلو من بعض المتسلقين على فضاء العلم الشرعي المقدس: 1- إبعاد كثير من العلماء والدعاة -المشتبكين مع الواقع- وزجهم في السجون منذ سنوات طويلة، وإسكاتهم عن التوجيه والتأثير، وهذا أدى إلى مشكلات كثيرة في الأمة. 2- تأخر كثير من العلماء القادرين على مواجهة هذه الظاهرة المنحرفة التي نشأت قبل سنوات، وكان بإمكانهم مواجهتها في بدايتها وحماية كثير من الشباب من ضررها -خاصة وأنها في تخصصهم

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Mo3tz_Ewais. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,035,859 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“معتز عويس | قناة التليغرام” (@Mo3tz_Ewais), 746 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Mo3tz_Ewais.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.