Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Mister100x Alpha Channel

Channel

Mister100x Alpha Channel

@Mister100xANN

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

119subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001237933439
TypeChannel
Username@Mister100xANN
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 October 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/Mister100xANN

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

119124121.57 August 2026 — 124 subscribers9 August 2026 — 124 subscribers8 September 2026 — 122 subscribers30 September 2026 — 121 subscribers12 October 2026 — 119 subscribers7 August 202612 October 2026
5 measurements spanning 66 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 118–125 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Oct 2026, 03:16119-2
30 Sept 2026, 10:55121-1
8 Sept 2026, 08:37122-2
9 Aug 2026, 03:00124no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:37124first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 18 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

25 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1768.0%
👏312.0%
🔥28.00%
😭28.00%
👌14.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 November 2025 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Jul 2026, 20:57 UTC37 viewsread 9 August 2026
Poll

Are you tired of crypto?

  1. Yes33%
  2. No67%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

14 Jun 2026, 06:25 UTC79 viewsread 9 August 2026

https://www.panewslab.com/en/articles/019ec48b-4b2e-74ed-b95f-a91f0bb038f0

9 Jun 2026, 18:51 UTC86 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

I still see "KOLs" on TG and X posting about historical patterns and how BTC is exactly where they expected. They STILL say an alt season is coming. Such bullshit. At what point do people admit they were wrong and there is no alt season? Ridiculous seeing how stubborn people are. I've been wrong a LOT and I have no problem saying that. Historical patterns don't mean shit. None of them have held up. Not one. Stop po…

👍2

2 Jun 2026, 14:37 UTC170 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

5 year ROI (since 2021) on BTC as of today is 0%. Don't let the narratives fool you. It has been a terrible "investment" over the past 5 years.

😭2👍1

29 May 2026, 04:47 UTC81 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

As expected, BTC and the overall crypto market looks terrible. Stay safe, everyone.

👍1

20 May 2026, 22:30 UTC109 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

If you bought btc at its ATH of $67,549 on 2021 and held it through today, you would have made 14%. That's it. 14% after 5 years. Terrible ROI. Even if you sold at ATH of $128k last year, you would have made less than 2x after holding for 5 years. In that time period, most blue chip stocks have more than tripled. The numbers are even worse when you compare altcoins over the past 5 years. I see no reason for the g…

👍2

6 May 2026, 21:18 UTC114 viewsread 9 August 2026

I love how everyone is bullish and buying shitcoins again, just so they can lose money again in 2 weeks. Can't teach old dogs new tricks I guess...

29 Apr 2026, 23:47 UTC126 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Since November, I've been saying the market is terrible and that people should be staying on the sidelines imo. Almost 6 months later, the market is exactly as I expected. People are asking what's next? When will things turn around? Nobody knows (even if they act like they do), so all I can say is as long as we're in a war, inflation is high, jobs are being taken over by AI, and people are deeply in debt (which the…

👏3

30 Mar 2026, 20:50 UTC96 viewsread 9 August 2026

If you all think crypto is bad now, wait until you see the decline in 2028 when Trump is about to end his term. Don't forget that crypto is being artificially propped up because of his "crypto-friendly" rhetoric. In my opinion, crypto has 2 years left to get its shit together. Otherwise this could be a long and painful road for crypto enthusiasts.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Mister100xANN. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Jul 2026, 20:57 UTCAnonymous Poll15 voters

Are you tired of crypto?

  1. Yes33%
  2. No67%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27 Dec 2025, 07:23 UTCAnonymous Poll24 voters

Are you still trading crypto?

  1. Yes46%
  2. No54%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 November 2025 to 16 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mister100x Alpha Channel” (@Mister100xANN), 119 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Mister100xANN.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.