Channel name was changed to «Архив 𝑴𝒊𝒓𝒊𝒂𝒎 𝑳𝒂𝒔𝒔»

Channel
Архив 𝑴𝒊𝒓𝒊𝒂𝒎 𝑳𝒂𝒔𝒔
@Miriam_Lass
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002541003990 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Miriam_Lass |
| Description | Этот канал принадлежит сети 𝕾𝖆𝖓𝖌𝖚𝖎𝖓𝖊𝖒. Администратор канала: @NightMaresie she/her |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 9 May 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Miriam_Lass |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:46 | 5 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:33 | 5 | first reading |
Engagement
5 posts held, back to 9 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 4
- Links
- 1
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
30 reactions across 4 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 10.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5278560608315264516 | 3 | 10.0% | |
| custom 5332551246328903379 | 3 | 10.0% | |
| custom 5364007281862128662 | 3 | 10.0% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 10.0% | |
| 💔 | 3 | 10.0% | |
| custom 5210769888192254875 | 2 | 6.67% | |
| custom 5332656717840791793 | 2 | 6.67% | |
| custom 5334554526449938122 | 2 | 6.67% | |
| custom 5470125727493931597 | 2 | 6.67% | |
| 💋 | 2 | 6.67% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 3.33% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 3.33% | |
| 💊 | 1 | 3.33% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 3.33% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 3.33% |
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 9 May 2025 to 23 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Всё таки жизнь непредсказуемая и совсем неуловимая. Не знаю уж, зачем это пишу. Впрочем нет, наверное знаю, но как же глупо и в тоже время неудобно это признавать. Живёшь и тут… Не всегда и всё можно предсказать заранее. Даже передовые агенты, сотрудники ФБР и полиция не могут учесть всех возможных развития событий. Разумеется, есть шаблоны, стратегии и план… Но всё это рушится в долю секунды, как карточный домик, и …
💔3❤2💋2
Иногда я думаю о том, что привело меня на тот жизненный путь, по которому я иду сейчас. В какой-то момент работа берет совсем иной оборот, и ожидаемое открывает глаза на довольно печальную реальность. Монотонность, неудачи из-за задержек и отлагательств, правда ускользающая как песок сквозь пальцы. В такие моменты начинаешь задаваться вопросом, а остаётся ли хоть что-то, что я делаю во благо расследования, а не ожида…
❤1🍾1👍1💊1🔥1🕊1
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 — 🤩десь хранится всё, что мне известно. Идеальных преступлений не бывает, бывают далекие от идеала расследования. Иногда мы имеем в наличии все необходимое, чтобы докопаться до правды, только на самом деле не хотим ее знать 🖤 `` 🤩аписи отсутствуют ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
custom 52107698881922548751custom 52785606083152645161custom 53325512463289033791custom 53326567178407917931custom 53345545264499381221custom 53640072818621286621custom 54701257274939315971
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩аждый день в любой стране, в любом городе происходят убийства. Несчастные случаи или суицид. Никто, в том числе и полиция, не знает почему, не понимает, как это происходит — в какой момент мы сворачиваем на темную дорожку. Ведь человек единственное создание, которое убивает только для того, чтобы убить. — 🤩дравствуй. Меня зовут Мириам Ласс. И я стажёр FBR под руководством Джека Кроуфорда. О…
custom 52785606083152645162custom 53325512463289033792custom 53640072818621286622custom 52107698881922548751custom 53326567178407917931custom 53345545264499381221custom 54701257274939315971
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @Miriam_Lass. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 282,033 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Архив 𝑴𝒊𝒓𝒊𝒂𝒎 𝑳𝒂𝒔𝒔” (@Miriam_Lass), 5 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Miriam_Lass.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.