И фото🔥
❤🔥15👎1

Channel
@MirGolubia
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,040subscribers
-20 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001953522158 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MirGolubia |
| Created | 2 October 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MirGolubia |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:57 | 1,040 | -2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:24 | 1,042 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:16 | 1,045 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 02:44 | 1,046 | +1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 14:26 | 1,045 | -16 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:33 | 1,061 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:07 | 1,063 | +3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:42 | 1,060 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:07 | 1,059 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:18 | 1,060 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:38 | 1,060 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
379 reactions across 19 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 216 | 57.0% | |
| 👍 | 36 | 9.50% | |
| 🔥 | 33 | 8.71% | |
| ⚡ | 23 | 6.07% | |
| 💯 | 22 | 5.80% | |
| 🕊 | 12 | 3.17% | |
| 👎 | 11 | 2.90% | |
| ☃ | 6 | 1.58% | |
| 🤩 | 6 | 1.58% | |
| 🤣 | 4 | 1.06% | |
| 😐 | 3 | 0.792% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 0.792% | |
| 🤨 | 2 | 0.528% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 0.528% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 379 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 February 2026 to 26 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @MirGolubia. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 February 2026 to 26 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 February 2026 to 26 April 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
И фото🔥
❤🔥15👎1
🐈⬛ Рецензия на проект: "Нейропсихоз". Компания Quest Zone 🟥 Оценки: Сюжет - 5/10 Игра актёров - 8/10 Локация - 7/10 Страх - 5/10 Безопасность - 10/10 Оригинальность - 10/10 Сервис - 10/10 Игроки, дошедшие до конца - 2/2 🟥 🔥 Описание от организатора: – Миллер, четвертая палата. Трое суток без нормального сна. – Его мозг работает без остановки. – Главные образы уже сформированы? – Да. У нас остался всего один день, …
👍4🤣3🔥1
Ни одного ответа мы не получили, и казалось, что если мы ещё минуту будем её спрашивать, она сейчас расплачется... Мне абсолютно не понравилось. Я не могу советовать этот квест никому. Ну максимум детям 10-12 лет. Это же был просто кошмар, да? 🟩 Забронировать проект можно здесь: https://spb.mir-kvestov.ru/quests/quest-zone-neyropsihoz Или со скидкой, написав сюда: @MirGolubiaAsk 🐈⬛
❤🔥12
И фотка💎
❤🔥14⚡6👎2🤩2
🐈⬛ Рецензия на проект: "The nun". Компания Quest Stars 🟥 Оценки: Сюжет - 6/10 Игра актёров - 10/10 Локация - 10/10 Страх - 10/10 Безопасность - 10/10 Оригинальность - 10/10 Сервис - 10/10 Игроки, дошедшие до конца - 2/2 🟥 🔥 Описание от организатора: – Сестра, вы странно себя ведете. Вам нездоровится? – Я снова ее видела, святой отец. – Кого? – Монахиню… Румыния, 1956 год. За 2 недели до этого. – Это всего лишь ста…
❤🔥3🔥3💯2👎1🤣1
Давно таких дел не было в Ватикане. Без помощи тут не обойтись! 🟩 Забронировать проект можно здесь: https://mir-kvestov.ru/quests/quest-stars-the-nun Или по скидке, написав сюда: @MirGolubiaAsk 🐈⬛
❤🔥6💯5🔥5👎1
И фотка🚫
❤🔥14⚡6👍5
Конечно странный у него метод, но рабочий, наверное... 🟩 Забронировать проект можно здесь: https://spb.mir-kvestov.ru/quests/dva-plus-dva-metod-simulyacia Или по скидке, написав сюда: @MirGolubiaAsk 🐈⬛
❤🔥11⚡5👍5
🐈⬛ Рецензия на проект: "Метод: симуляция". Компания 2 + 2 🟥 Оценки: Сюжет - 7/10 Игра актёров - 10/10 Локация - 9/10 Страх - 8/10 Безопасность - 10/10 Оригинальность - 10/10 Сервис - 10/10 Игроки, дошедшие до конца - 2/2 🟥 🔥 Описание от организатора: Вы – группа сотрудников спецслужб из разных подразделений. Ваша миссия: отправиться в секретную исследовательскую лабораторию в качестве добровольцев для спецпроекта …
❤🔥7⚡4👍4🤨1😐1
Оскар 2026 Не могу не сказать пары слов. Намного лучше, чем в прошлом году. Слава богу не было второй "Аноры", но "Грешники" близки. Но правосудие восторжествовало и победил достойный фильм! Правда без странных лауреатов не обошлось. Каким образом Ди Каприо не забрал статуэтку - загадка. Про победу Эми Мэдиган за участие в фильме УЖАСОВ вообще молчу Хочется верить, что в следующем году премия опять отдаст победу д…
❤🔥12😐1
Девушки, девочки, женщины, с праздником вас!🕺
❤🔥55💯15🕊12🔥2🤩2
И крутая фотка💀
❤🔥12🔥6👍5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MirGolubia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мир глазами голубя” (@MirGolubia), 1,040 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MirGolubia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.