Channel
@MintyDAOnews
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
13subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001595468476 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MintyDAOnews |
| Description | Chat @MintyDAOio - Next ENS & NFT DeFi protocol - mintydao.io Get bonus tokens at defi.mintydao.io/fetch MINTS Token: 0xefca0d0ddff6a7b70302d8cc58c7162f3581bc43 First DEX with contracts controlled DAO & an upwards-pricing treasury-building model |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 9 September 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MintyDAOnews |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 13 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:36 | 13 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 September 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 June 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
7 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 4 | 57.1% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 42.9% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 September 2022 to 25 June 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
MINTS Token: 0xefca0d0ddff6a7b70302d8cc58c7162f3581bc43 Test pool on our dex (not final): https://www.dextools.io/app/ether/pair-explorer/0x6bcbef39c8a0ce72ee4a6f4b3a1d8eb1ce127a26 Next ENS, NFT & DeFi dapps evolution News at @MintyDAOnews
Our Augur style dex bets post in the Lobsters_chat defi channel is here
Augur style dex bets dexbets.mintydao.io Example use: will eth flip wbtc by date D In the below example: “Yes” voters win if eth is above the “expected” wbtc price shown: 0.073 This isn’t a flipping event. It’s near the current price shown as 0.0719 and ends on Jan 22 Eth has been added to the bet since this image was posted, so check it. The bet payout is determined by how much yes & no bet value is placed on …
Should this be an nft or collection? React to it here: https://t.me/NFT_avenue/47671
Get your $MINTS ahead of SBF funny movies Coming this week to @MintyDAOio at MintyDAO.io TWTTER RT + Like
Be 145+. Buy $MINTS
Chainlink just announced 🚀 MintyDAO.io 🚀 —an expansive Web3 project for domain name use cases—has integrated Chainlink Automation on Ethereum. Explore how Automation helps trigger weekly incentive payouts to liquidity providers on MintyDAO's DEX Join news, & chat at @MintyDAOio Get Bonus MINTS pre-launch here now
🔥2👍1
Max harberger fees % people would pay per year to protect their NFTs from forced buy out - eg pay 2% per year on $100 ($2 per year), to allow forced buyout of your NFT at $100, but not below $100. Fees go to artists, to align incentives for ongoing dev
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Max harberger fees % people would pay per year to protect their NFTs from forced buy out - eg pay 2% per year on $100 ($2 per year), to allow forced buyout of your NFT at $100, but not below $100. Fees go to artists, to align incentives for ongoing dev
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Upvote new MintyDAO.io post on REDDIT post on ETH
Minty new Docs are up. Feedback welcome!
👍1🔥1
Just locked in Chainlink marketing collaboration publication for Oct 6. Will try to have that published even earlier. They have a very large community
👍1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MintyDAOnews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Max harberger fees % people would pay per year to protect their NFTs from forced buy out - eg pay 2% per year on $100 ($2 per year), to allow forced buyout of your NFT at $100, but not below $100. Fees go to artists, to align incentives for ongoing dev
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Max harberger fees % people would pay per year to protect their NFTs from forced buy out - eg pay 2% per year on $100 ($2 per year), to allow forced buyout of your NFT at $100, but not below $100. Fees go to artists, to align incentives for ongoing dev
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
What’s the most you’d pay to make any bets on dex like “will ETH flip BTC by December 2023?, if the revenue goes 100% to buy MINTS (MintyDAO.io - chat @mintydaoio)
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
What pools do you want to farm for high apy?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Prefer ETH or USDC for the MINTS 1st and only pool on its next ENS & NFT defi platform on the Ethereum L1 main net?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
What max ETH GAS cost ratio is tolerable to get e.g. 100% locked bonus tokens on a next evolution nft & defi platform? L2 has cheap gas but L1 market caps tend to reach higher (so token prices may rise more) Do you prefer new platforms on eth L1 or L2?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 September 2022 to 25 June 2023. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MintyDAO news” (@MintyDAOnews), 13 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MintyDAOnews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.