Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Mina Ash πŸ’

Channel

Mina Ash πŸ’

@MinaAsh_MinaAshFans

On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Stars Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

12,407subscribers

-269 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001897234448
TypeChannel
Username@MinaAsh_MinaAshFans
Created4 May 2023 β€” measured β€” dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/MinaAsh_MinaAshFans

Topic

Other / unclassifiable β€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

12,40312,68012,541.57 August 2026 β€” 12,676 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 12,669 subscribers9 August 2026 β€” 12,668 subscribers10 August 2026 β€” 12,671 subscribers11 August 2026 β€” 12,670 subscribers12 August 2026 β€” 12,680 subscribers14 August 2026 β€” 12,666 subscribers15 August 2026 β€” 12,648 subscribers16 August 2026 β€” 12,659 subscribers17 August 2026 β€” 12,670 subscribers18 August 2026 β€” 12,667 subscribers19 August 2026 β€” 12,656 subscribers20 August 2026 β€” 12,640 subscribers21 August 2026 β€” 12,650 subscribers23 August 2026 β€” 12,619 subscribers25 August 2026 β€” 12,610 subscribers25 August 2026 β€” 12,614 subscribers26 August 2026 β€” 12,593 subscribers27 August 2026 β€” 12,584 subscribers28 August 2026 β€” 12,575 subscribers29 August 2026 β€” 12,564 subscribers31 August 2026 β€” 12,549 subscribers1 September 2026 β€” 12,531 subscribers2 September 2026 β€” 12,521 subscribers3 September 2026 β€” 12,518 subscribers4 September 2026 β€” 12,498 subscribers7 September 2026 β€” 12,486 subscribers10 September 2026 β€” 12,448 subscribers12 September 2026 β€” 12,438 subscribers14 September 2026 β€” 12,424 subscribers16 September 2026 β€” 12,403 subscribers18 September 2026 β€” 12,407 subscribers12,4077 August 202618 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 42 days, net -269. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,361–12,722 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 08:3812,407+4
16 Sept 2026, 03:2212,403-21
14 Sept 2026, 09:5712,424-14
12 Sept 2026, 20:3712,438-10
10 Sept 2026, 19:1812,448-38
7 Sept 2026, 14:5712,486-12
4 Sept 2026, 17:3812,498-20
3 Sept 2026, 00:0312,518-3
2 Sept 2026, 01:0812,521-10
1 Sept 2026, 04:0512,531-18
31 Aug 2026, 01:2512,549-15
29 Aug 2026, 22:1412,564-11
28 Aug 2026, 20:2612,575-9
27 Aug 2026, 21:0712,584-9
26 Aug 2026, 23:2512,593-21
25 Aug 2026, 22:1312,614+4
25 Aug 2026, 00:4312,610-9
23 Aug 2026, 09:5812,619-31
21 Aug 2026, 23:4712,650+10
20 Aug 2026, 18:0312,640first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 4 May 2023 β€” the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
0.706%
avg views Γ· 12,407 subscribers
Avg views / post
87.6
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.31%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held26 (4 May 2023 – 1 September 2026)
Views total788
Reactions total34
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 21:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 49s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 21 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β€” not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no β‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

125 reactions across 24 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀5241.6%
❀‍πŸ”₯2822.4%
πŸ”₯2520.0%
πŸ₯°108.00%
πŸ‘64.80%
😍32.40%
🍾10.8%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 125 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 4 May 2023 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 25 we hold a reading for Β· 16%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars β€” bought with money β€” on a post by @MinaAsh_MinaAshFans. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 26 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 May 2023 to 1 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 20:37 UTC101 views5 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @Kate_Carvajal_Kathrin3Photo

πŸ‘‰ BEST GIRLS JUST FOR YOU πŸ“

❀‍πŸ”₯3❀1πŸ”₯1

31 Aug 2026, 19:38 UTC59 views4 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @Elyylabella_Ely_La_BellaVideo

πŸ‘‰ BEST GIRLS JUST FOR YOU 🧁

❀4

30 Aug 2026, 18:26 UTC117 views3 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Forwarded from @Haven_Tunin_PotteryprincessVideo

πŸ‘‰ BEST GIRLS JUST FOR YOU 🧁

❀2πŸ₯°1

29 Aug 2026, 16:18 UTC48 views2 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Forwarded from @Hayley_Davies_HayleyDaviesFansVideo

Hayley Davies

❀‍πŸ”₯2

28 Aug 2026, 15:28 UTC104 views3 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @Lexi2legit_LexiLovesYou_Hot4lexiPhoto

πŸ‘‰ BEST GIRLS JUST FOR YOU πŸ“

❀‍πŸ”₯3

27 Aug 2026, 11:51 UTC62 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @Dani_Tabares_soydanitabaresbbPhoto

Dani Tabares

❀2πŸ₯°2

26 Aug 2026, 11:43 UTC82 views4 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Forwarded from @Elly_Clutch_EllyClutchPhoto

πŸ‘‰ BEST GIRLS JUST FOR YOU πŸ“

❀‍πŸ”₯3πŸ”₯1

25 Aug 2026, 11:25 UTC95 views5 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Forwarded from @Sara_Sfamurri_Therealmorenita_FaVideo

Sara Sfamurri

πŸ”₯4❀1

24 Aug 2026, 11:09 UTC120 views4 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Forwarded from @Urbabydollxo_Lela_Sohna_babydollPhoto

Urbabydollxo

❀‍πŸ”₯2❀1πŸ”₯1

23 Aug 2026, 10:09 UTC77 views4 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Forwarded from @FoopahhFan_Trixie_FoopahhPhoto

πŸ‘‰ BEST GIRLS JUST FOR YOU πŸ”₯

❀‍πŸ”₯4

22 Aug 2026, 09:53 UTC94 views3 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Forwarded from @Vicraeee_queenpussybossv_VictoriPhoto

πŸ‘‰ BEST GIRLS JUST FOR YOU πŸ“

❀‍πŸ”₯2🍾1

21 Aug 2026, 06:34 UTC17 viewsread 21 August 2026
Forwarded from @Carter_Cameron_CarterCameronFanPhoto

Carter Cameron

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @MinaAsh_MinaAshFans. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

JadeTeen πŸ’• Lovejadeteen
@JadeTeenFans_Lovejadeteen Β· 4,171
2 posts
Alaine Cheeks
@Alaine_Cheeks_alainecheeks Β· 4,497
1 post
Bella Rama 😈
@Bella_Rama_bellaramatv Β· 4,664
1 post
Carter Cameron ️
@Carter_Cameron_CarterCameronFan Β· 4,672
1 post
Christina Khalil πŸ”₯ Khalittle
@Christina_Khalil_khalittle Β· 13,707
1 post
Dani Tabares πŸ‡ LillySullivan πŸ‡ Sofiamariana
@Dani_Tabares_soydanitabaresbb Β· 4,521
1 post
Elly Clutch πŸ’
@Elly_Clutch_EllyClutch Β· 23,492
1 post
Elyylabella πŸ’Ž Ely La Bella
@Elyylabella_Ely_La_Bella Β· 5,201
1 post
Fernanda Mota Farhat πŸ‘
@Fernanda_Mota_Farhat_Fernanda Β· 16,608
1 post
Trixie Foopahh 🌢
@FoopahhFan_Trixie_Foopahh Β· 19,850
1 post
Hanna Miller πŸ“ Daniela Gil
@Hanna_Miller_Daniela_Gil_Fans Β· 17,639
1 post
Haven Tunin πŸ’• Potteryprincess
@Haven_Tunin_Potteryprincess Β· 4,301
1 post
Hayley Davies 🦘
@Hayley_Davies_HayleyDaviesFans Β· 11,853
1 post
Heralteregoo 🫢🏼 Rebecca McLeod
@Heralteregoo_Rebecca_McLeod Β· 3,410
1 post
Isa Bella πŸ”₯ Hulkandisa
@Isa_Bella_Hulkandisa_IsaBellaFan Β· 4,148
1 post
Kate Carvajal πŸ”₯ Kathrin3
@Kate_Carvajal_Kathrin3 Β· 5,996
1 post
Lexi2legit πŸ’• Lexi Loves You πŸ’• Hot4lexi
@Lexi2legit_LexiLovesYou_Hot4lexi Β· 14,610
1 post
Sara Sfamurri πŸ’ Therealmorenita
@Sara_Sfamurri_Therealmorenita_Fa Β· 573
1 post
Solyluna24 πŸ’¦ Melissa Herrera
@Solyluna24_Melissa_Herrera Β· 4,654
1 post
Strawberrytabby πŸ‘ Tabby Lookofsky
@Strawberrytabby_Tabby_LookofskyF Β· 12,393
1 post
Urbabydollxo πŸ’ Lela Sohna πŸ’ Leila Santese
@Urbabydollxo_Lela_Sohna_babydoll Β· 39,002
1 post
Victoria Rae πŸ‘ Vicraeee πŸ‘ Queenpussybossv
@Vicraeee_queenpussybossv_Victori Β· 14,283
1 post
Luvcoregf πŸ’˜
@luvcoregf_luvcoregffans Β· 14,078
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œMina Ash πŸ’β€ (@MinaAsh_MinaAshFans), 12,407 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MinaAsh_MinaAshFans.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.