Photo, posted without a caption
👍28❤2
Channel
@MilitaryHamas
On this record: Previous handles · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
9,965subscribers
-131 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001869907361 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MilitaryHamas |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MilitaryHamas |
@MilitaryHamas was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 9,965 | -31 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:28 | 9,996 | -17 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:59 | 10,013 | -14 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:47 | 10,027 | -14 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:07 | 10,041 | -14 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:11 | 10,055 | -23 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 22:12 | 10,078 | -8 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:40 | 10,086 | -10 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:52 | 10,096 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 10,096 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 24 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (24 May 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 577 |
| Reactions total | 30 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Aug 2026, 01:38 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
741 reactions across 21 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 372 | 50.2% | |
| 🫡 | 217 | 29.3% | |
| 😢 | 66 | 8.91% | |
| 👍 | 65 | 8.77% | |
| 🔥 | 17 | 2.29% | |
| 🕊 | 4 | 0.54% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 741reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
👍28❤2
Video, posted without a caption
❤42🫡10🔥4
🔴🚨Urgent | A fierce clash between Iranian forces and the US Navy is currently underway in the Strait of Hormuz.
❤22🫡6
🔴🚨فوری| درگیری شدید میان نیروهای ایرانی و نیروی دریایی آمریکا هماکنون در تنگه هرمز در جریان است.
❤12🫡4
🔴Iranian Army Force: Two important US bases in Kuwait were targeted by destructive drone attacks
👍22❤9
🔴نیروی ارتش ایران : دو پایگاه مهم آمریکا در کویت، آماج حملات پهپادهای انهدامی قرار گرفت
👍15❤1
Video, posted without a caption
😢38❤10🫡5🕊4
🔻 صوت غزة! ▪️ شهيدان و28 مصاباً بينهم 2 خطيرة وحرجة بقصف الاحتلال خيمة على شاطئ بحر خانيونس، جنوب قطاع غزة. لم يبقَ هناك ما يُحكى.. إلى متى أيها العالم الأخرس والأعمى؟! يا رب أقم عدلك، اللهم عجّل بالثأر. 🔻 Voice of Gaza! ▪️ Two martyrs and 28 injured, including 2 in critical and serious condition, in an attack by the occupation forces on a tent on the beach of Khan Younis, south of the Gaza Strip. There's noth…
😢20❤10🫡3
Stars of the Al-Aqsa Flood Our martyr, Mohammed Asa'd Abdeen, dedicated his life to protect his people and homeland from the atrocities of the Israeli occupation. He was a model of a loyal freedom fighter who fought bravely to liberate Palestine. Mohammed was martyred after an honourable lifetime marked by commitment, sacrifice, and perseverance. His memory will remain in the hearts of his beloved people as a valia…
❤31🫡17😢2
Stars of the Al-Aqsa Flood Our martyr, Shadi Awni Tutah, dedicated his life to defend his people and homeland. He was a model of a faithful freedom fighter who fought bravely to liberate Palestine. Shadi was martyred after a long life marked by commitment, sacrifice, and perseverance. His memory will remain in the hearts of his beloved people as a valiant leader who was wise and honest. May Almighty Allah have mer…
❤25🫡16😢3
#شاهد خطاب الناطق العسكري باسم كتائب الشهيد عز الدين القسام "أبو عبيدة" "وَلا تَهِنُوا وَلا تَحْزَنُوا وَأَنتُمُ الأَعلَونَ إِن كُنتُم مُّؤمِنِينَ" #طوفان_الأقصى
❤40🫡14
Video, posted without a caption
❤31🔥8🫡2
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @MilitaryHamas. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“الاعلام العسکری” (@MilitaryHamas), 9,965 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MilitaryHamas.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.